UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN


PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  þ                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:
¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

 (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

 (5)

Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)  Filing Party:
(4)  Date Filed:


 

NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

TIME AND DATE:

ACCESS THE ANNUAL MEETING:

RECORD DATE:

Thursday, June 18, 2020

7:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the annual
meeting will be held virtually. Shareholders may
participate by logging in at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAL2020.

April 30, 2020

AGENDA

 

At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

Board Recommends Vote:

ITEM 1

Election of 12 directors named in the Proxy Statement

FOR each nominee

(3)

ITEM 2

Filing Party:Advisory vote on executive compensation

FOR

ITEM 3

Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for 2020

FOR

(4)

ITEM 4

Date Filed:Shareholder proposal regarding right to act by written consent, if properly presented

AGAINST

ITEM 5

Shareholder proposal on a climate lobbying report, if properly presented

AGAINST

ITEM 6

Shareholder proposal on a political contributions report, if properly presented

AGAINST

ITEM 7

Shareholder proposal regarding sexual harassment policy, if properly presented

AGAINST


LOGO

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

P.O. Box 20706

Atlanta, GA 30320

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Notice of Annual Meeting

Dear Stockholder:

On behalfIn addition, we will transact any other business properly presented at the meeting, including any adjournment or postponement by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, it is a pleasure to invite you to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Delta Air Lines, Inc. The meeting will be held at 7:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Friday, June 10, 2016, at the offices of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, 825 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10019. At the meeting, stockholders will vote on the following matters:Directors.

the election of directors for the next year;

an advisory vote on executive compensation (also known as “say on pay”);

approval of the amendment and restatement of our Performance Compensation Plan;

the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Delta’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2016;

a stockholder proposal (if the proposal is properly presented at the meeting); and

any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

If you were a holder of record of Delta common stock at the close of business on April 18, 2016, you will be entitled to vote at the meeting. A listof stockholdersshareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination during normal business hours for ten days before the meeting at Delta’s Investor Relations Department, 1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. The stockholdershareholder list will also be available at the meeting.

Because space at the meeting is limited, admission will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Stockholders without appropriate documentation may not be admitted to the meeting. If you plan to attendthemeeting virtually, please see the instructions on page 873 of the attached proxy statement. If you will need special assistance at the meeting because of a disability, contact Investor Relations toll free at (866) 715-2170.

We encourage stockholdersshareholders to sign up to receive future proxy materials electronically, including the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. Using electronic communication significantly reduces our printing and postage costs and helps protect the environment. To sign up, visithttp://enroll.icsdelivery.com/dal.dal.

Please read our attached proxy statement carefully and submit your vote as soon as possible. Your vote is important. You can ensure that your shares are voted at the meeting by using our Internet or telephone voting system, or by completing, signing and returning a proxy card.

Sincerely,

BY INTERNET IN ADVANCE

BY TELEPHONE

BY MAIL

AT THE MEETING

LOGO

LOGO
Richard H. AndersonDaniel A. Carp
Chief Executive OfficerChairman of the Board

Atlanta, Georgia

April 29, 2016


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions

Call 1-800-690-6903

Sign,dateandreturn your proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope

Attend the annual meeting virtually. Seepage73 for instructions on how to attend

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being mailed, and the attached proxy statement is being made available, to our shareholders on or about May 7, 2020.

Pleasereadourattachedproxystatementcarefullyandsubmityourvoteassoonaspossible.Yourvoteisimportant.YoucanensurethatyoursharesarevotedatthemeetingbyusingourInternetortelephonevotingsystem,orbycompleting,signingandreturningaproxycard.

Atlanta, Georgia
May 7, 2020

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     1


LETTER FROM THE NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

As the non-executive Chairman of the Board, thank you for your support of Delta Air Lines especially during this time of challenge for our company, our country and the global community we serve. At all times and especially this time of crisis, our Board strives to oversee Delta in a responsible and transparent way.

2019 was an amazing year for Delta - record profits and outstanding operational performance demonstrating the strength of Delta’s people and its culture. In the blink of an eye, the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupted our industry, our country and our world.

The information in this proxy statement is primarily related to our 2019 results and our upcoming annual meeting, but I wanted to use this space to highlight the actions we have taken with respect to executive compensation in 2020 as of April 15. As CEO, Ed is setting the example by forgoing his salary for six months through September and the other members of the executive leadership team are taking a 50% pay cut through September. All other officers of the company are taking a 50% pay cut for three months through the end of June and managing director and director-level employees are taking a 25% pay cut for the same period. As Board members, we are also forgoing our cash retainers for six months.

The strong foundation of good governance described in the pages of this proxy statement has been especially crucial in this time. The breadth of experience and wisdom among the Board members is critical as we exercise our responsibility to oversee the strong management team in place at the company. When board members who bring varied experiences are able to interact in the collegial and engaged way in which we operate, you can be confident that we are working hard on your behalf.

We are especially grateful to Dan Carp for his 13 years of leadership on the Delta Board. Dan served as the non-executive chair of the Board during a time of significant change and growth in the global industry. Joining the Board as Chair in 2007, Dan’s tenure has seen Delta lead the industry through a period of industry consolidation and expansion in the global marketplace. The Board’s thoughtful oversight during this period has resulted in Delta’s emergence as the leader in the global industry. Dan’s leadership, thoughtfulness and commitment to Delta will be missed, and we wish him well in his retirement from the Board.

As we look forward to the second half of this year and the challenges that lie ahead for Delta, the Board welcomes your support and engagement. We encourage you to share suggestion and concerns with us. In particular, we encourage you to review this proxy statement, and vote in the upcoming meeting.

As always, we deeply appreciate your support as shareholders and customers.

Sincerely,

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     2


LETTER FROM THE CEO

In 2019, Delta demonstrated the power of our people and brand with our best year in history operationally, financially and for our customers. We know every year comes with its challenges, and we knew 2020 would be no exception. But we could have never predicted just how quickly the COVID-19 pandemic would upend our plans and reset expectations for the year, as demand for near-term air travel dropped to almost zero in a matter of weeks.

We all hope this period will end soon, but we must be realistic that the timing and shape of revenue recovery are uncertain. The actions we have taken and continue to take in the coming months will define how Delta emerges on the other side.

As we look ahead to the rest of 2020, our response remains focused on three priorities:

Takingcareofourpeopleandcustomers. Nothing is more important than the health and safety of our employees and customers. We have invested in resources to increase cleanliness across the organization, including a wide range of safety and cleaning measures on planes, at airports and across our facilities. These actions won’t end when the virus abates – we will continue to invest in new techniques to make flying safer than ever. We are also taking steps to help our employees and customers practice social distancing, including blocking middle seats, pausing automatic upgrades, modifying our boarding process and reducing meal service.

Preserving our liquidity. As revenues rapidly deteriorated, we took decisive action to reduce our cost base and protect liquidity. We hit pause on every project that was not necessary and cut expenses by consolidating airport operations, closing many Delta Sky Clubs and delaying non-essential aircraft maintenance. Since early March, we have raised capital and are receiving payroll support under the CARES Act. Our actions so far, combined with CARES Act relief, should bolster our liquidity to over $12 billion by the end of the June quarter, putting us on a solid path to stay above our $5 billion minimum liquidity target throughout the entire year.

PositioningDeltaforrecovery. We are confident that people will begin to travel again. The actions we take now and over the next few quarters will define Delta’s recovery position. To succeed, we will need to be a more nimble airline going forward. Delta’s core business strengths are enduring: our people, brand, domestic network and operational reliability. These advantages will continue to differentiate Delta and position us to succeed while rescaling the business and our cost structure.

We have the best team in the industry, and I thank all 90,000 employees for the incredible work they are doing. Our employees are on the front lines in the fight against the virus, keeping our nation’s airways open for essential travel. They are ensuring that medical professionals, first responders and other critical workers can get to the destinations where they are most needed.

As of late April, 37,000 employees – more than one-third of our workforce – have chosen to take voluntary unpaid leaves, ranging from 30 days to one year, a significant personal sacrifice for which I will forever be grateful.

We know Delta will successfully navigate through this crisis and remain the airline of choice when our customers are ready to fly again. Our culture and people ensure we will always do what is right for our customers, our shareholders, and each other. Thank you for your support now and always.

Sincerely,

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     3


  ›TABLE OF CONTENTS    

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

1

5

GENERAL INFORMATIONTHE DELTA DIFFERENCE

5

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials2019 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

5

6

Stockholders Entitled to VoteDIRECTOR NOMINEES

5

7

Voting Shares of Common Stock Registered in Your Name or Held under PlansEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

5

8

Revoking a Proxy or Voting InstructionsINVESTOR ENGAGEMENT EFFORTS

6

8

Voting Shares Held in Street NameENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) HIGHLIGHTS

6

9

Limitation on Brokers’ Authority to Vote SharesEnvironmental Stewardship

7

9

Quorum for the Annual MeetingCorporate Social Responsibility Commitment

7

11

Votes Necessary to Act on ProposalsGovernance Highlights

7

13

Recommendations of the Board of DirectorsGOVERNANCE - BOARD MATTERS

8

14

Presentation of Other Business at the MeetingBOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

8

14

Attending the MeetingBOARD COMMITTEES AND GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

8

14

GOVERNANCE MATTERSBOARD REFRESHMENT PROCESS

9

16

Governance OverviewBOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATION PROCESS

9

16

Director IndependenceBOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK MANAGEMENT

9

17

Directors Elected Annually; Majority Voting for DirectorsCOMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS

9

17

Identification and Selection of Nominees for DirectorSHARE OWNERSHIP

9

18

Audit Committee Financial Experts

10

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

10

Communications with Directors

10

Board of Directors

10

Board of Directors Leadership Structure

10

Board Committees

11

Board Oversight of Risk Management

13

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

15

Certain Information About Nominees

15

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

22

18

Directors, Nominees for Director and Executive Officers

22

Beneficial Owners of More than 5% of Voting Stock

23

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

24

20

Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

24

21

Executive SummaryCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

24

35

Executive Compensation Philosophy and ObjectivesCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

27

35

Say on Pay Voting ResultsEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

28

36

Administration of the Executive Compensation Program

28

Compensation Decision Factors

30

Comparative Market Data; Peer Group

30

Elements of Compensation

32

Risk Assessment

40

Executive Compensation Policies

40

Compensation for Mr. Anderson

41

Post-Employment Compensation

42

i


Tax and Accounting Impact and Policy

42

Compensation Committee Report

43

Information about Summary Compensation Table and Related Matters

44

Summary Compensation Table

44

36

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

47

38

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

48

39

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

49

41

Post-Employment CompensationPOST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

50

41

Defined Benefit Pension BenefitsCEO PAY RATIO

50

46

Pension Benefits Table

51

Potential Post-Employment Benefits upon Termination or Change in Control

52

Other Benefits

53

Tables Regarding Potential Post-Employment Benefits upon Termination or Change in Control

55

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

60

47

Stock Ownership GuidelinesDIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

60

48

Director Compensation TableSTOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

61

48

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTPROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

62

49

2020 NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

49

SKILLS AND EXPERIENCES OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

50

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

64

55

PROPOSAL 3 — APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN

65

Why Stockholders Should Approve This Proposal

65

Key Features of the Performance Compensation Plan

66

Summary of Performance Compensation Plan

68

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

72

PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

73

56

Fees of Independent Auditors for 2015 and 2014FEES OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

73

57

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit ServicesPRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

73

57

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

58

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

60

PROPOSAL 4 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT

60

PROPOSAL 5 — STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – SENIOR EXECUTIVE STOCK RETENTION REQUIREMENT- CLIMATE LOBBYING REPORT

62

PROPOSAL 6 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS REPORT

65

PROPOSAL 7 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY

74

67

VOTING INFORMATION

69

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

69

SHAREHOLDERS ENTITLED TO VOTE

69

QUORUM FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING

69

HOW TO VOTE

69

REVOKING A PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

71

LIMITATION ON BROKERS’ AUTHORITY TO VOTE SHARES

71

VOTES NECESSARY TO ACT ON PROPOSALS

71

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD

72

OTHER INFORMATION

73

PRESENTATION OF OTHER BUSINESS AT THE MEETING

73

ATTENDING THE MEETING VIRTUALLY

73

HOUSEHOLDING

73

COST OF SOLICITATION

74

SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

74

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL MEASURES

75

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     4


Back to Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

The Delta Difference

As of the date this proxy statement is being published, the COVID-19 pandemic has driven a sudden and significant impact on our business. Our quick response to protect liquidity along with our proven track record over the last decade position Delta to navigate through the crisis and restore Delta to its pre-crisis position of strength.

In 2019, Delta connected over 200 million customers across our expansive global network to more than 300 destinations in over 50 countries. Over the last decade, Delta has built a strong financial foundation, achieved record customer satisfaction scores, established diversified revenue streams and created a scale advantage through the transformation of its global network.

OTHER MATTERSPOWERFUL CONSUMER BRAND

77

Cost of SolicitationCOMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES

77

Submission of Stockholder Proposals

77

Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

77

Supplemental Information about Financial Measures

77

APPENDICES

Performance Compensation Plan

A-1

Comparative Analysis of Options & Full Share Utilization/Overhang

B-1

ii


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Meeting:

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Date:

Friday, June 10, 2016

Time:

7:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Location:

Offices of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, 825 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10019

(located in Midtown Manhattan between 49th and 50th Streets)PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF EXECUTION

Record Date:Delta is an exceptional,trustedconsumerbrandthat consistently delivers a superior travel experience.

Over the last decade, we significantly improved thequality and reliability of our operations. As a result, customer satisfaction scores have more than tripled – our domestic net promoter score has improved from 15% in 2009 to 50.8% in 2019, an all-time high, with scores improving in all geographic regions. Withoperational excellence and best-in-class service, we earn our customers’ trust and preference.

In 2019, Delta was named one of Fortune’sMostAdmiredCompanies and its MostAdmiredAirline for the eighth time in the past nine years, The Wall Street Journal’s best US Airline (for the third year), number1inTheBusinessTravelNewsAnnualAirlinesurvey, and certified as a GreatPlacetoWorkfor the fourth consecutive year, with 92% of employees proud to work at Delta.

April 18, 2016

Voting:At the core of Delta are ourpassionate and determined professionals with an innate sense of caring for our customers. Our people consistently deliver industry- leading results and drive further improvements and efficiencies through innovation.

In 2019, our operations had281 days without a mainline cancellation and 165 days without a cancellation systemwide.

Our globalnetwork has the best connecting hub complex – including the world’s most efficient hub in Atlanta - enhanced by stronginternationalalliancesandjointventures.

Our ascending brand and strong, growingrelationshipwithAmericanExpress® combine to produce customer loyalty and a diversified, high-margin revenue stream.

Stockholders as

Over the last decade we have fundamentally transformed our business, creating a customer-focused operation with improvements in product, reliability and service and established a strong financial foundation. Our broad financial principle has been to reinvest nearly half of our operating cash flow into the business, providing Delta the ability to invest in our people, airports, new fleet and technology.

In 2019, Delta was theworld’s largest airline by total revenues and themost profitable with five consecutive years of $5 billion or more in pre-tax income.

As a result of the record date are entitledimpact COVID-19 is having on Delta’s cash flow in 2020, the company has taken on more leverage. Delta is confident that it has the right course of action to vote. Each outstanding sharesuccessfully navigate through the crisis and position the company to regain its pre-crisis position of common stock is entitledstrength. Upon recovery, the company intends to one vote. The Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials will be distributed beginning on or about April 29, 2016.

Meeting Agenda and Board Recommendations
MatterBoard RecommendationPage Reference

Management Proposalspay down debt levels to strengthen its balance sheet.

Item 1: Election of Directors

FOR each director nominee15

Item 2: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

FOR64

Item 3: Approval of Amendment and Restatement of Performance Compensation Plan

FOR65

Item 4: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors

FOR73

Stockholder Proposal

Item 5: Senior Executive Stock Retention Requirement

AGAINST74

 

ITEM 1.Election of Directors:

We ask you toelect 14 directors. Each of the directors listed in the chart below is standing for election to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. The following chart provides summary information about each director nominee. Additional information may be found beginning on page 15.

Director Age  Director
Since
  Occupation Independent  Other
Public
Boards
  Current
Delta
Committees

Richard H. Anderson

  60    2007   Executive Chairman of Delta      1   n/a

Edward H. Bastian

  58    2010   CEO of Delta      1   n/a

Francis S. Blake

  66    2014   Former Chairman and CEO of The Home Depot, Inc. ü     2   A, CG*

Daniel A. Carp

  67    2007   Former Chairman and CEO of Eastman Kodak ü     2   CG, P&C*

David G. DeWalt

  51    2011   Chairman and CEO of FireEye ü     2   CG, S&S

Thomas E. Donilon

  60    2015   Vice Chair of O’Melveny & Myers ü     0   F, S&S

William H. Easter III

  66    2012   Former Chairman, President and CEO of DCP Midstream ü     2   A,* CG

Mickey P. Foret

  70    2008   Former CFO of Northwest Airlines ü     1   A, S&S*

Shirley C. Franklin

  70    2011   Executive Chair, Purpose Built Communities; Former Mayor of Atlanta ü     1   A, P&C

George N. Mattson

  50    2012   Former Partner of Goldman Sachs ü     0   F,* P&C

Douglas R. Ralph

  61    2015   Captain, B767ER, Delta      0   F, S&S

Sergio A.L. Rial

  55    2014   Chairman of Banco Santander Brazil ü     0   A, P&C

Kathy N. Waller

  57    2015   CFO of The Coca-Cola Company ü     2   CG, F

Kenneth B. Woodrow

  71    2004   Former Vice Chairman and President of Target Corporation ü     0   F, P&C

† Effective May 2, 2016

A - Audit Committee

CG - Corporate Governance Committee

F - Finance Committee

P&C - Personnel & Compensation Committee

S&S - Safety and Security Committee

* - Chair

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.1

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     SUMMARY


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY5

 

ITEM 2:Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Back to Contents

2019 Performance Highlights

Delta people produced record financial results, industry-leading operational reliability and continued improvements in customer satisfaction. We ask you toapprove, on an advisory basis, compensation awarded tomaintained our named executive officers. Additional information regarding executive compensation may be foundposition as a reliable, customer-focused airline with strong profits and cash flow.

Below are some of the categories of performance measures included in the summary section below and on page 64.

ITEM 3:Approval of Amendment and Restatement of Performance Compensation Plan

We ask you toapprove the amendment and restatement of our Performance Compensation Plan. Additional information may be found on page 65.

ITEM 4:Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors

We ask you toratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for 2016. Additional information may be found on page 73.

ITEM 5:Senior Executive Stock Retention Requirement

We ask you tovote against a stockholder proposal requesting the Board of Directors adopt a stock retention policy in which senior executives would be required to retain at least fifty percent of net after-tax shares received through Delta’s equityincentive compensation plans until retirement age is reached or employment is terminated. Additionalthat demonstrate our pay for performance philosophy. See page 28 for further information may be found beginning on page 74.about the performance measures included in these plans.

PRE-TAX INCOME

 

2015 Performance Highlights*

We had a successful 2015, a year in which we reported record financial performance. Delta’s performance was recognized when we were again named one of the top 50 world’s most admired companies and the most admired airline for the fifth time in six years byFortune magazine. Key accomplishments in 2015 include:OPERATIONAL RELIABILITY AND CUSTOMER SERVICE

Strong Financial Results

 

•      Excluding special items, earned pre-tax income of $5.9 billion, a $1.4 billion increase over 2014 and Delta’s sixth consecutive year of solid profitability.

LOGO

•      Returned $2.6 billion to stockholders through a combination of quarterly cash dividends and share repurchases; reduced adjusted net debt to $6.7 billion, a $600 million reduction from 2014.

LOGO

CONTINUED BALANCE SHEET PERFORMANCE

 

 

*

* See “Supplemental Information about Financial Measures” at the end of this proxy statementon page 75 for a reconciliationreconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures and the reasons we use non-GAAP financial measures. On a GAAP basis for 2015, pre-tax income was $7.2 billion and debt and capital lease obligations were $8.3 billion. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015 is available athttp://ir.delta.com/shareholder-resources/annual-meetings/default.aspx but is not incorporated into this proxy statement.them.

 

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     SUMMARY

2DELTA AIR LINES, INC.6



PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Continued Revenue MomentumBack to Contents

Director Nominees

 

•      Expanded operating revenue by $300 million to $40.7 billion.

•      Generated a unit revenue premium relative to the industry for the fifth year in a row.

LOGO

Excellent Operating Performance

•      Another year of strong operating performance, resulting in a mainline on-time arrival rate of 85.8%, a flight completion factor of 99.6%, and continued our 1st place performance in fewest Department of Transportation customer complaints among the major network carriers.

LOGO

Committee Chair

Executive Compensation Program

Pay for performance is the foundation of our executive compensation philosophy, as the following highlights reflect:★★ Expected to become Chair upon Mr. Carp’s retirement.

 

 

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     7


Back to Contents

Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is based on the philosophy that we can best achieve our short-term and long-term business goals, which we refer to as our Flight Plan, by closely linking pay to performance and aligning the interests of all Delta employees, including executive officers, with our customers and shareholders.

PERFORMANCE-BASED

EMPLOYEE-ALIGNED

EQUITY-BASED

Under our pay for performance philosophy, our executive compensation program places a substantial portion 94%of total compensation at risk (i.e., value received is contingent upon Delta’s financial, operational and stock performance), emphasizing variable over fixed compensation. Ninety-four percent of Delta’sour Chief Executive Officer’s target compensation opportunity for 2015 wasis at risk. Eighty-three percentrisk

Payislinkedtoperformance based on the achievement of Mr. Anderson’s totalfinancial, operational, customer service and stock price performance measures

Our peoplearecriticaltooursuccess, and we are committed to Delta being a great place to work

Our annual and long-term incentive plans includegoalsthatalsodrivepayoutstofrontlineemployees under our broad-
based profit sharing and shared rewards programs

82%of our Chief Executive Officer’s target compensation is concentrated indelivered through equity-based opportunities

Equity-based incentives focusonlong-termshareholdervalueand his cash-based compensation (base salary and annual bonus) is below the 25th percentile of Delta’s custom peer group.alignourexecutiveofficers’interests with shareholders by rewarding strategic success

Investor Engagement Efforts

We have long-standing, active engagement with our investors. OurseniormanagementmetwithanalystsandinvestorsatourannualInvestorDayinDecember2019andmorethan10industryconferencesthroughout2019. We have dedicated resources to engage with all shareholders through monitoring of investor relations e-mail and using various media to convey key investment messages to a broader audience. In 2019, Delta was named as a “Most Honored Company” by the financial journal InstitutionalInvestor,which ranked Delta’s investor relations effort number 1 in the airline category.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     8

 


Our annualBack to Contents

Environmental, Social and long-term incentive plans utilize different stretch measuresGovernance (ESG) Highlights

We are committed to being a good steward of operating, customerthe environment, a positive force in our communities and financial performance goalsa great place to drive Delta’swork and fly. This commitment is based on our culture of a strong set of core values that put people first in all we do - whether it’s our employees, the nearly 200 million customers who trust us with their travel each year, or the millions who make up the communities where we live, work and serve.

Environmental Stewardship

As a responsible business, strategy, deliver valuewe remain mindful of the impact of our global decisions. Nowhere is this clearer than in our view and approach to reducing carbon emissions and managing our stockholders and alignenvironmental impacts.

SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM OVERSIGHT

The oversight of our environmental sustainability program is guided by the interests of management with frontline employees.following:

Regular Board level oversight by reporting environmental sustainability initiatives and status to the Corporate Governance Committee began in 2018

Continuing cross-divisional executive level oversight of environmental sustainability initiatives and guidance on priorities

Regular engagement of a 20 person cross-divisional steering committee, overseeing environmental sustainability reporting across Delta and implementing an internet site devoted to our sustainability matters

Guided by The Delta Environmental Sustainability Principles: Action, Innovation, Collaboration, Evolution and Transparency

TRANSPARENCY AND REPORTING

We report our environmental sustainability practices through the following:

DowJonesNorthAmericanSustainabilityIndex
(9thyearinarow)

FTSE4Good,European(Sustainability)Index
(5thconsecutiveyear)

 

LeadershipbandfromCDP
A-Score

CDP evaluates how companies measure and manage their risks and opportunities on climate change

ClimateRegistry
Continuedverificationofourcarbonfootprint

Prepared and reviewed reports for numerous customer, industry and rating agency ESG disclosures, including Sustainalytics, MSCI and ISS, while also engaging with institutional investors and organizations such as the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) on ESG trends and opportunities

More information about our sustainability practices is in our Corporate Responsibility Report, reporting GRI, SASB and TCFD indicators, which can be found at www.delta.com/sustainability. That website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE ACTION

The aviation industry accounts for roughly 2 percent of global carbon emissions. Our carbon footprint is our largest environmental impact, with 98 percent of emissions coming from aircraft. We continueare focusing our efforts to focus on long-term compensation opportunities. The Personnel & Compensation Committeebecome carbon neutral through carbon reduction, carbon removal and stakeholder engagement. Some of the Board of Directors continuedmost notable achievements to grant all awards under long-term incentivedate and plans with vesting schedules of three years. For further information seefor the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section offuture in each area include the proxy statement under “Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentives.”

We do not provide any supplemental executive retirement plans or deferred compensation plans to our executive officers. They participate in the same on-going retirement plans as our frontline employees.

following:

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.3

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     SUMMARY


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY9

 


Back to Contents

Carbon Reduction

Governance Highlights

Fleet Replacement

Replacing older mainline aircraft with newer aircraft that are typically 25% more efficient on a per seat basis than the aircraft they replace

Fuel Savings

Established a Fuel Board, comprised of senior leaders from each operating division to focus on promoting fuel savings initiatives throughout the airline. Initiatives pushed by the Delta Fuel Council and Fuel Board saved 33M gallons of fuel, $75M in fuel cost, and avoided 325,000 metric tons of carbon emissions

Sustainable Aviation Fuel

Flew our first flights with the use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in partnership with Airbus for A330-900neo deliveries and with Airbus and AirBP for 20 carbon-neutral A321 deliveries from Mobile

Invested $2M in a feasibility study with Northwest Advanced Bio-Fuels (NWABF). The project would utilize wood residue deposits and wood slash from forest floors to produce SAF

Signed an offtake agreement with Gevo to purchase 10 million gallons of SAF per year, made from inedible, industrial corn products

Carbon Removal

Purchased and retired more than 12 metric tons (or more than 26 billion pounds) of offsets since 2012

Offset projects typically also support UN Sustainable Development Goals

Stakeholder Engagement

Partnered with corporate accounts to address emissions; pilot carbon offset agreements in place with companies such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Columbia Sportswear, Merck and UCB Biopharmaceuticals

Global Partnerships & Coalition Building: multi-million dollar contribution to Global Citizen movement to address climate change, reduce inequality and end extreme poverty by 2030; Delta’s CEO Ed Bastian became the co-chair of Global Citizen’s private sector

Established Youth Advisory Board on Sustainability, made up of several young environmental champions who help support Delta’s sustainability work

Actively collaborating with the FAA and the airline industry to modernize the air traffic control (ATC) system through forums such as the NextGen Advisory Committee (NAC); modernization efforts reduce delays, decrease fuel consumption, and cut carbon emissions by shortening flights and providing more direct routes

Engaged with industry, government and ICAO on CORSIA and other climate and environmental regulations

Progress Against Industry Goals

As a result of these measures, we have shown improvements against industry climate metrics:

Waste Reduction Achievements in 2019

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     10


Back to Contents

Corporate Social Responsibility Commitment

Our valuespeople and our culture are the foundation of our success. We regularly assesshave long understood that taking care of our people also leads to satisfied customers and stakeholders.

Our culture also involves giving back to the communities we serve as well as serving important global initiatives.

With The Delta Air Lines Foundation, contributed $55 million as part of our annual commitment to give one percent of net income to key charitable organizations in our communities

Recognized as a national leader in our commitment to anti-human trafficking efforts, which includes continuing to train our front-line employees to help identify and report suspected instances of human trafficking

Beginning in 2019, paying all employees for a day of service each year to qualified non-profit organizations of their choice

METRIC

GOAL

INDICATORS OF CONTINUING PROGRESS

COMMUNITY

Donate 1% of our net income to key charitable organizations

Contributed $55 million in 2019 to the communities we serve.

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

Achieve 85 percent positive employee engagement

Met our goal as measured through positive employee engagement responses to our annual employee survey, in which more than37,000 employees participated(over 40% of Delta’s employees).

CUSTOMER SAFETY

Proactively reduce risks by identifying, assessing, mitigating and/or eliminating hazards that may cause incidents, accidents or injuries to customers

On-board aircraft, in boarding bridges and at airport gates,we perform risk assessments for the safety of our customers. Our in-flight safety demonstrations and announcements arecontinually enhanced. Our pilot and maintenance teams collaborate to continuously report on and repair on board equipment such as seats, tray tables and bins.

EMPLOYEE SAFETY

Achieve world-class personal safety performance with the goal of sending all Delta employees and business partners home safely

Our safety culture enabled us to maintain a3.9 percentTotal Recordable Injury Rate in 2019, performance that was even with 2018 and43 percent better than the industry average. Our days away, restricted or transfer rate was 3.21 days in 2019 compared to 3.09 in 2018. In 2019, we experienced a work-related fatality for the first time since 2010.

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Consistent year-over-year growth in net promoter scores

Sustained strong record of customer satisfaction. Achieved record net promoter scores (NPS) throughout the year and at year-end across all of our regions, including arecord 50.8 NPS on domestic flights - an increase of 5 points from 2018.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     11


Back to Contents

COMMUNITY IMPACT

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     12


Back to Contents

Governance Highlights

Delta has a history of a strong, independent Board, composed of seasoned members with diversity of experiences. The Board is committed to sound corporate governance practices and highlights include:in line with evolving best practices.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD PRACTICES

Independent chairman (as of May 2, 2016, separate executive chairman, lead director and CEO)

All directors elected annually. Average Board tenure of nominees is less than 5 years

Ongoing Board succession efforts — 8 of 13 current directors first elected from 2014 to the present. Regular Board committee refreshment. Almost half of Board nominees are diverse

Majority voting for directors in uncontested elections

Proxy access; special meeting call by holders of 20% of outstanding common stock

Corporate Governance Principles provide no outside director will stand for re-election after age 72

Robust annual self-evaluations of Board and Board committees

Regular comprehensive succession planning for management, evidenced by successful senior leadership transition

Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy for all employees and Board

Corporate Governance Principles prohibit ownership of specific airline competitors’ stock by Board and officers

Meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for Board and executive officers

No shareholder rights plan (poison pill) or super-majority voting

No employment agreements or supplemental executive retirement plans for officers

 

Directors elected annually

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     13

 


Majority voting for directors in uncontested electionsBack to Contents

GOVERNANCE - BOARD MATTERS

11 of 14 director-nominees are independent

Executive sessions without management directors atDuring 2019, the Board of Directors andmet 11 times. Each director who served on the Board Committeeduring 2019 attended at least 75% of the meetings

Meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for members of the Board of Directors and the committees on which he or she served that were held during his or her tenure on the Board. It is the Board’s policy that directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting. All of Delta’s directors attended the annual meeting in 2019. During the year, the Board routinely held executive officerssessions without the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Blake presided at these sessions as non-executive Chairman of the Board.

Board Leadership Structure

Because we believe operating pursuant to sound governance practices benefits the long-term interests of our shareholders, for many years we have chosen to elect an independent, non-executive Chairman of the Board separate from our Chief Executive Officer.

We believe the non-executive Chairman of the Board plays an important governance leadership role that enhances long-term shareholder value. The Chairman’s responsibilities include:

 

Activechairing meetings of non-management directors (executive sessions)

presiding at the annual meeting of shareholders

briefing the Chief Executive Officer on issues raised in executive sessions

in collaboration with the Corporate Governance Committee, committee chairs and the Chief Executive Officer, scheduling Board oversightmeetings, setting Board agendas and strategic discussions and providing a review of risk managementpre-meeting materials delivered to directors

Regularoverseeing annual Board, committee and Chief Executive Officer performance evaluations and succession planning

All membersmanaging the Board and committee oversight of risks

recommending appropriate governance policies and practices

overseeing the Audit Committeeavoidance of conflicts of interest

recommending Board committee and committee chair assignments

facilitating director discussions inside and outside the boardroom, managing the relationship between the Chief Executive Officer and the Board, consulting with the Chief Executive Officer and serving as a counterweight as appropriate

overseeing the process for selecting new Board members

calling meetings of the Board of Directors are designated financial experts underand shareholders

chairing the rules of the Securities and Exchange CommissionCorporate Governance Committee

Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy for all employees and Board members

Prohibition on any director or officer directly owning stock in a competitor airline

No stockholder rights plan (poison pill) or super-majority voting

Commitment to sustainability (inclusion in Dow Jones Sustainability Index)

Annual advisory vote to approve executive compensation

Regular outreach to institutional stockholders

Clawback policy

No employment contracts, deferred compensation programs or supplemental executive retirement plans

Delta does not provide company cars, personal club memberships, executive life insurance, financial planning, or home security protection to its executive officers

Prohibits recycling of shares withheld or delivered to satisfy the exercise price or tax withholding requirements of stock options or stock appreciation rights

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY4DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


GENERAL INFORMATION

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

Under rules adoptedcarrying out other duties requested by the SecuritiesChief Executive Officer and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are furnishing proxy materials (including our 2015 Form 10-K) to our stockholders on the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies to each stockholder. If you received a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) by U.S. or electronic mail, you will not receive a paper copy of these proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice tells you how to accessBoard

Board Committees and review the proxy materials and vote your shares on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials free of charge, follow the instructions in the Notice. The Notice will be distributed to our stockholders beginning on or about April 29, 2016.

Governance DocumentsStockholders Entitled to Vote

The Board of Directors set April 18, 2016 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. On the record date, 771,592,324 shares of Delta common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding. The common stock is the only class of securities entitled to vote at the meeting. Each outstanding share entitles its holder to one vote.

Voting Shares of Common Stock Registered in Your Name or Held under Plans

The control number you receive in your Notice covers shares of common stock in any of the following forms:

common stock registered in your name (“registered shares”);

common stock held in your account under the Delta Pilots Savings Plan (“Pilot Plan”);

common stock allocated to your account under the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”); or

unvested restricted common stock granted under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan.

Special Note to Delta Employees About the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. If you are a Delta employee participating in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the control number you receive in your Notice does not cover shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the plan. These shares are held for your benefit by Fidelity in street name. For information about voting these shares, see “Voting Shares Held in Street Name.”

Your submission of voting instructions for registered shares results in the appointment of a proxy to vote those shares. In contrast, your submission of voting instructions for common stock held in your Pilot Plan account or allocated to your Savings Plan account, or for unvested restricted common stock granted under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan, instructs the applicable plan trustee or administrator how to vote those shares, but does not result in the appointment of a proxy. You may submit your voting instructions regarding all shares covered by the same control number before the meeting by using our Internet or telephone system or by completing and returning a proxy card, as described below:

Voting by the Internet or Telephone. You may vote using the Internet or telephone by following the instructions in the Notice to access the proxy materials and then following the instructions provided to allow you to record your vote. After accessing the proxy materials, to vote by telephone, call 1-800-690-6903 or to vote by the Internet, go towww.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by using a personal identification number. These procedures enable stockholders to confirm their instructions have been properly recorded.

Voting by Proxy Card. If you obtained a paper copy of our proxy materials, you may also vote by signing, dating and returning your instructions on the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Please sign the proxy card exactly as your name appears on the card. If shares are owned jointly, each joint owner should sign the proxy card. If a stockholder is a corporation or partnership, the proxy card should be signed in the full corporate or partnership name by a duly authorized person. If the proxy card is signed pursuant to a power of attorney or by an executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, state the signer’s full title and provide a certificate or other proof of appointment.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.5GENERAL INFORMATION


To be effective, instructions regarding shares held in your Pilot Plan account or allocated to your Savings Plan account must be received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 8, 2016. Instructions regarding registered shares or unvested restricted common stock must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 9, 2016.

You may also vote registered shares by attending the annual meeting and voting in person by ballot; this will revoke any proxy you previously submitted.

Note that you may not vote shares of unvested restricted common stock, shares held in your Pilot Plan account or shares allocated to your Savings Plan account in person at the meeting. If you do not submit voting instructions in a timely manner regarding shares of unvested restricted common stock, shares held in your Pilot Plan account or shares allocated to your Savings Plan account, they will not be voted. See “Voting Shares Held in Street Name” below for information about voting Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares.

All properly submitted voting instructions, whether submitted by the Internet, telephone or U.S. mail, will be voted at the annual meeting according to the instructions given, provided they are received prior to the applicable deadlines described above. All properly submitted proxy cards not containing specific instructions will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations set forth on page 1. The members of Delta’s Board of Directors designated to vote the proxies returned pursuant to this solicitation are Richard H. Anderson, Daniel A. Carp and Kenneth B. Woodrow.

Revoking a Proxy or Voting Instructions

If you hold registered shares, unvested restricted common stock, shares in your Pilot Plan account or shares allocated to your Savings Plan account, you may revoke your proxy or voting instructions prior to the meeting by:

providing written notice to Delta’s Legal Department at Delta Air Lines, Inc., Dept. No. 981, 1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30354, Attention: Assistant Corporate Secretary; or

submitting later-dated instructions by the Internet, telephone or U.S. mail.

To be effective, revocation of instructions regarding shares held in your Pilot Plan account or allocated to your Savings Plan account must be received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 8, 2016. Revocation of instructions regarding registered shares or unvested restricted common stock must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 9, 2016.

You may also revoke your proxy covering registered shares by attending the annual meeting and voting in person by ballot. Attending the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy. Note that you may not vote shares of unvested restricted common stock, shares held in your Pilot Plan account or shares allocated to your Savings Plan account in person at the meeting.

Voting Shares Held in Street Name

If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other record holder (that is, in “street name”), refer to the instructions provided by the record holder regarding how to vote your shares or to revoke your voting instructions. This includes any shares purchased through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. You may also obtain a proxy from the record holder permitting you to vote in person at the annual meeting. Without a proxy from the record holder, you may not vote shares held in street name by returning a proxy card or by voting in person at the annual meeting.If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you provide instructions to, or obtain a proxy from, the record holder if you want your shares to count in the election of directors (Proposal 1), the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 2), the approval of the amendment and restatement of our Performance Compensation Plan (Proposal 3) and the stockholder proposal (Proposal 5). As described in the next section of this proxy statement, regulations prohibit your bank or broker from voting your shares in the election of directors (Proposal 1) and Proposals 2, 3 and 5 if you do not provide voting instructions.

GENERAL INFORMATION6DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Limitation on Brokers’ Authority to Vote Shares

Under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on certain matters on behalf of clients who do not provide voting instructions at least 15 days before the date of the annual meeting. Generally, brokerage firms may vote to ratify the appointment of independent auditors and on other “discretionary” items, but brokers are not permitted to vote your shares for the election of directors (Proposal 1) and Proposals 2, 3 and 5 unless you provide voting instructions. Accordingly, if your shares are held in a brokerage account and you do not return voting instructions to your broker by its deadline, your shares may be voted by your broker on Proposal 4, but not the other proposals described in this proxy statement. Broker non-votes will not be considered in connection with Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 5.Therefore, we urge you to give voting instructions to your broker on all proposals.

Quorum for the Annual Meeting

The quorum at the annual meeting will consist of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of all shares of common stock that are outstanding and entitled to vote. Abstentions from voting and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted in determining whether a quorum is present. The meeting will not commence if a quorum is not present.

Votes Necessary to Act on Proposals

At an annual meeting at which a quorum is present, the following votes will be necessary on each of the proposals:

Each director shall be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director. For purposes of this vote, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed 50% of the votes with respect to that director (excluding abstentions).

The advisory vote to approve executive compensation (“say on pay”) requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Even though the outcome of the vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on Delta, the Personnel & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

Approval of the amendment and restatement of our Performance Compensation Plan requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2016 requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal.

Approval of the stockholder proposal described in this proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and entitled to vote. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal.

Broker non-votes, if any, will be handled as described under “Limitation on Brokers’ Authority to Vote Shares.”

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.7GENERAL INFORMATION


Recommendations of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

FOR the election of the director-nominees named in this proxy statement;

FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Delta’s named executive officers;

FOR the approval of the amendment and restatement of our Performance Compensation Plan;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Delta’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2016; and

AGAINST the stockholder proposal described in this proxy statement.

All properly submitted proxy cards not containing specific instructions will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations.

Presentation of Other Business at the Meeting

Delta is not aware of any business to be transacted at the annual meeting other than as described in this proxy statement. If any other item or proposal properly comes before the meeting (including, but not limited to, a proposal to adjourn the meeting in order to solicit votes in favor of any proposal contained in this proxy statement), the proxies received will be voted at the discretion of the directors designated to vote the proxies.

Attending the Meeting

To attend the annual meeting, you will need to show you are either a Delta stockholder as of the record date, or hold a valid proxy from such a Delta stockholder.

If your shares are registered in “street name,” or are held in your Pilot Plan account or your Savings Plan account, please bring evidence of your stock ownership, such as your most recent account statement.

If you own unvested restricted common stock, please bring your Delta-issued identification card; we will have a list of the holders of unvested restricted common stock at the meeting.

All stockholders should also bring valid picture identification; employees may use their Delta-issued identification card. If you do not have valid picture identification and proof that you own Delta stock, you may not be admitted to the meeting.

GENERAL INFORMATION8DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Governance Overview

Delta believes that sound governance practices are essential to enhance long-term value for our stockholders. We operate under governance practices that are transparent and consistent with best practices.

You may view the charters ofhas established the Audit, Corporate Governance, Finance, Personnel & Compensation and Safety & Security committees to assist it in discharging its responsibilities. The number of meetings for each of these committees in 2019 and Security Committees,primary responsibilities are listed on the next page. A complete list of the responsibilities of each committee can be found in the committee charters, which are available in the corporate governance section of our website at ir.delta.com/governance/. Our Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws, Delta’s corporate governance principles, ourCorporate Governance Principles, codes of ethics and business conduct and our director independence standards onare also available in the corporate governance section of our Corporate Governance website athttp:ir.delta.com/governance//ir.delta.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx. You may obtain a copy

All members of these materials by contacting Delta’s Assistant Corporate Secretary at the address on the next page.

Director Independence

Independence of Audit, Corporate Governance, and Personnel & Compensation Committee Members

For many years, Delta’s Board of Directors has been composed of a substantial majority of independent directors. Delta’s Board established the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Finance Committee, the Personnel & Compensation Committee and the Safety and Security Committee to focus on particular Board responsibilities.

The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that all current directors are independent under the NYSE listing standards and Delta’s director independence standards, except Richard Anderson and Ed Bastian, who are not independent because each is an executive officer of Delta, and Doug Ralph, who is not independent because he is a Delta pilot. In making these independence determinations, the Board of Directors considered information submitted by the directors in response to questionnaires, information obtained from Delta’s internal records and advice from counsel.

The Audit, Corporate Governance and Personnel & Compensation Committees consist entirely ofare non-employee directors who are independent, as defined in the NYSENew York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards and Delta’s director independence standards. The members of the Audit Committee also satisfy the additional independence requirements set forth in rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act (the “1934 Act”)1934 Act). In addition, each member of the Audit Committee has been designated an Audit Committee Financial Expert. The members of the Personnel & Compensation Committee also satisfy the additional independence requirements set forth in rules under the 1934 Act.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     14


Back to ContentsDirectors Elected Annually; Majority Voting for Directors

Delta’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that all directors are elected annually. Under the Bylaws, a director in an uncontested election is elected by a majority of votes cast (excluding abstentions) at a stockholders’ meeting at which a quorum is present. In an election for directors where the number of nominees exceeds the numberAUDIT COMMITTEE

Members

Primary Responsibilities

William H. Easter III* (Chair)

Francis S. Blake*

Ashton B. Carter

David G. DeWalt*

Michael P. Huerta

Kathy N. Waller*

Meetingsin2019:9

oversees our financial reporting and disclosure processes, including the appointment of our independent auditors, the review of the audit and work of our internal audit department and the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting

oversees compliance with procedures and processes pertaining to corporate ethics and standards of conduct

reviews and, if appropriate, approves or ratifies possible conflicts of interest involving members of the Board or executive officers and related party transactions that would be subject to disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K

reviews enterprise risk management processes and discusses major risk exposures with management

reviews cybersecurity risks and the security and operations of our information technology systems

*Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Audit Committee Report can be found on page 58.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Members

Primary Responsibilities

Francis S. Blake (Chair)

Daniel A. Carp*

William H. Easter III

George N. Mattson

Kathy N. Waller

Meetingsin2019:5

leads the Board’s governance practices and procedures, including the search for and recruiting of new outside directors and consideration of nominees for the Board

oversees our governance standards, processes for evaluation of the Board and its committees, compensation of non-employee directors and the company’s ESG sustainability efforts

*Retiring at the Annual Meeting

FINANCE COMMITTEE

Members

Primary Responsibilities

George N. Mattson (Chair)

Daniel A. Carp*

Jeanne P. Jackson

Sergio A. L. Rial

David S. Taylor

Meetingsin2019:10

reviews and makes recommendations about the financial structure of the company, financial planning, investments, acquisitions and divestitures, operating plans, capital structure and hedging activities

reviews and approves or recommends to the Board commitments, capital expenditures and financing transactions

*Retiring at the Annual Meeting

PERSONNEL & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Members

Primary Responsibilities

Daniel A. Carp (Chair)*

Francis S. Blake

Jeanne P. Jackson

George N. Mattson

Sergio A. L. Rial**

David S. Taylor

Meetingsin2019:8

oversees our general compensation philosophy and practices and the annual review of our Chief Executive Officer and reviews and approves compensation programs for our executive officers

reviews management succession plans and the company leader and talent planning process

makes recommendations to the Board regarding election of officers

*Retiring at the Annual Meeting

**Expected to become Chair upon Mr. Carp’s retirement

The Personnel & Compensation Committee Report can be found onpage 35.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     15


Back to be elected — a contested election — the directors are elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.Contents

SAFETY & SECURITY COMMITTEEIdentification and Selection of Nominees for Director

Members

Primary Responsibilities

David G. DeWalt (Chair)

Ashton B. Carter

William H. Easter III

Christopher A. Hazleton

Michael P. Huerta

Kathy N. Waller

Meetingsin2019:5

oversees and consults with management on our customer, employee and aircraft operating safety and security

reviews current and proposed safety and security-related programs, policies and compliance matters

reviews matters with a material effect on our flight safety operations and security

establishes and approves annual safety and security goals

Board Refreshment Process

The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors nominees for election to the Board.

DeltabelieveseachcurrentnomineefortheBoardofDirectorshasthefollowingattributes:

integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards

extensive business acumen and sound judgment

a track record of service as a leader in business or governmental settings

The Committee seeks nominees who have the skills and experience to assist management in the operation of Delta’s business.business and to provide input on Delta’s strategy, among other matters. In accordance with Delta’s corporate governance principles, the Corporate Governance Principles, the Committee and the Board of Directors assess potential nominees (including incumbent directors) based on factors such as the individual’s business experience, character, judgment, diversity of experience, international background and other matters relevant to the Board’s needs and objectives at the particular time. Independence, financial literacy, and the ability to devote significant time to Board activities and to the enhancement of the nominee’s knowledge of Delta’s business are also factors considered for Board membership.

In its succession planning role, the Committee regularly considers potential candidates for the Board in light of the company’s new and evolving risks, strategies and operations. While the Board does not have a specific policy with respect to diversity, the Board and Corporate Governance Committee recognize that the members of the Board should represent the diversity of Delta’s customers, employees and management. The Corporate GovernanceCommittee balances the desire for continuity on the Board with the benefits of fresh perspectives and additional experiences to align with the changing business.

The Committee retains third-party search firms from time to time to assist in identifying and preliminarily screening potential Board members.

members who have experience that would complement and enhance the current Board.

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.9GOVERNANCE MATTERS


Board and Committee Evaluation Process

For many years our Board of Directors and each of its committees have annually engaged in comprehensive self-evaluations. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates potential nominees suggestedoversees the evaluations and re-examines the process for the Board and Board committee evaluations each year. For the 2019 evaluation, the Chief Legal Officer spoke individually with each Board member to discuss specific topics, such as issues of importance to the Board for 2020, strategic planning, succession planning and key attributes of new directors, and to obtain his or her assessment of Board and committee performance, functioning and operations during the year. These discussions also allowed time for engagement with each director on any other topic he or she desired to discuss. The comments of the directors were compiled on an anonymous basis and reviewed by stockholdersthe Board and the Board committees in executive sessions. The Chairman of the Board and the chairs of the committees address follow-up matters from the evaluations. These included continuing focus on strategy, cybersecurity, sustainability, risk management and investments, as well as operational matters, among other items. The Board believes this annual evaluation process supports its effectiveness and continuous improvement.

Topics discussed during the same basis as all other potential nominees. To recommend a potential nominee, you may:Board performance evaluation one-on-ones with the Chief Legal Officer include:

issues of importance to the Board for 2020

risk management, strategic planning and succession planning

board structure and processes

an assessment of Board and committee performance in 2019

 

ir.delta.com

e-mailnonmgmt.directors@delta.comor  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     16


send a letter addressed to Delta’s Law Department at Delta Air Lines, Inc., Dept. No. 981, 1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30354, Attention:Chief Legal Officer.

Each potential nominee is reviewed and screened by the Corporate Governance Committee, which decides whetherBack to recommend a candidate for consideration by the full Board.Contents

Board Oversight of Risk ManagementAudit Committee Financial Experts

The Board of Directors has designated Mr. Easter, Mr. Blake, Mr. Brinzo, Mr. Foret, Ms. Franklinultimate responsibility to oversee Delta’s enterprise risk management program (ERM). Headed by the Vice President — Corporate Audit & Enterprise Risk Management, the ERM program instills a heightened awareness of risk management throughout Delta, identifies and Mr. Rial ascategorizes risks and monitors the progress of enterprise risk mitigation plans. The role of ERM is to provide a risk management framework with cross functional alignment to enable risk informed decision-making through identification and categorization of risks and monitoring the progress of enterprise risk mitigation plans. The Board discusses risk throughout the year, particularly when reviewing operating and strategic plans and when considering specific actions for approval. Depending on the nature of the risk, the responsibility for oversight of selected risks may be delegated to appropriate committees of the Board, with material findings reported to and discussed with the full Board. Delegations of risk oversight by the Board include:

The Audit Committee Financial Experts.

Compensation Committee Interlocksreviews the ERM framework at the enterprise level; reviews management’s process for identifying, managing and Insider Participation

Noneassessing risk; oversees the management of risks related to the integrity of the membersconsolidated financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, the internal audit function, and legal and regulatory matters.

The Board delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of risks related to cybersecurity and the security and operations of the information technology systems. Members of the Audit Committee receive internal and external training on cybersecurity risks, and an experienced cybersecurity professional, David DeWalt, is a member of the Audit Committee and has been a Delta director since 2011.

The Executive Vice President-Chief Information Officer and the Vice President-Chief Information Security Officer and their staffs regularly report to the Audit Committee on cybersecurity and information technology risks and initiatives.

The Finance Committee oversees the management of risks related to aircraft fuel price and fuel hedging; foreign currency and interest rate hedging; Delta’s financial condition and capital structure; its financing, acquisition, divestiture and investment transactions and related matters.

The Personnel & Compensation Committee reviews risks related to management succession and development, Delta’s executive compensation program, Company leadership and talent planning process and related matters.

The Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks related to Board of Directors’ succession plans, Delta’s corporate governance, ESG sustainability and related matters.

The Safety & Security Committee oversees the management of risks related to customer, employee, aircraft and airport operating safety and security and related matters.

Delta’s ERM process is a former or current officer orjourney of continuous improvement and iteration to meet the evolving needs of our business. Leaders of the business divisions, working closely with the ERM leader, have responsibility for risk identification, development of business risk mitigation plans, and monitoring and reporting progress of their implementation. The corporate safety and security department oversees the risk management process for risks related to customer, employee, aircraft and airport safety and security matters. A senior management level, cross-divisional council, the Delta Risk Council (DRC), meets quarterly and includes the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Controller, Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President — Corporate Audit & Enterprise Risk Management, among others. The DRC is responsible for overseeing all of Delta or has any interlocking relationshipsthe company business and safety and security risks, including the following: monitoring risk tolerance levels; defining organizational responsibilities for risk management; identifying significant risks to Delta; and risk mitigation and management strategies based on Delta’s risk tolerance levels as set forthwell as monitoring the business to determine that risk mitigation activities are in applicable SEC rules.place and operating. As appropriate, various officers and employees attend meetings of the DRC and follow up on issues addressed within the DRC.

The Board of Directors believes that Delta’s leadership structure, combined with the roles of the Board, its committees, and the DRC, provide the appropriate leadership for effective risk oversight.

Communications with Directors

StockholdersShareholders and other interested parties may communicate with our non-management directors by sending ane-mail tononmgmt.directors@delta.com. We have established a link to this address on our Investor Relations website. Communications with directors may also be mailed to Delta’s Corporate Secretary at Law Department, at the address listed above.Delta Air Lines, Inc., Department 981, P.O. Box 20574, Atlanta, Georgia, 30320. Communications will be sent directly to the lead directorChairman of the Board, as representative of the non-management directors, other than communications pertaining to customer service, human resources, accounting, auditing, internal control and financial reporting matters. Communications regarding customer service and human resources matters will be forwarded for handling by the appropriate Delta department. Communications regarding accounting, auditing, internal control and financial reporting matters will be brought to the attention of the Audit Committee Chair.

Board of Directors

During 2015, the Board of Directors met 12 times. Each director who served on the Board during 2015 attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees on which he or she served that were held during his or her tenure on the Board. It is the Board’s policy that directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting. All of Delta’s directors, except one, attended the annual meeting in 2015.

In 2015, the Board routinely held executive sessions without the Chief Executive Officer or any other management director. Mr. Carp, who served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board during 2015, presided at these executive sessions. In his role as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Carp’s responsibilities also included those described below under “Board of Directors Leadership Structure.”

Board of Directors Leadership Structure

Because we believe operating pursuant to sound governance practices benefits the long-term interests of our stockholders, since 2003 we have chosen to elect an independent, non-executive chairman separate from our Chief Executive Officer. Governance commentators, proxy voting advisory firms, and institutional stockholders generally conclude the separation of the two roles is a “best practice.” We believe the non-executive Chairman of the Board plays an important governance leadership role that enhances long-term stockholder value. His responsibilities include:

chairing meetings of non-management directors (executive sessions);

presiding at the Annual Stockholders Meeting;

briefing the Chief Executive Officer on issues raised in executive sessions;

 

GOVERNANCE MATTERS10DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


in collaboration with the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, committee chairs and the Chief Executive Officer, scheduling Board meetings, setting Board agendas and strategic discussions and providing a review of pre-meeting materials delivered to directors;

overseeing Board, committee and senior management evaluations and succession planning;

managing the Board’s oversight of risks;

recommending appropriate governance policies and practices;

overseeing the avoidance of conflicts of interests;

recommending Board committee and committee chair assignments;

facilitating director discussions inside and outside the boardroom, managing the relationship between the Chief Executive Officer and the Board, consulting with the Chief Executive Officer and serving as a counterweight as appropriate;

overseeing the process for selecting new Board members;

calling meetings of the Board and stockholders;

chairing the Corporate Governance Committee;

conducting/overseeing the annual evaluation of the committees and the Board; and

carrying out other duties requested by the Chief Executive Officer and the Board as a whole.

Governance commentators, proxy advisory firms and institutional stockholders advise companies without a separation of the Chief Executive Officer and chairman to elect a lead director having the very same specific responsibilities as our non-executive chairman listed above. The goal of both the non-executive chairman and the lead director is the same — to provide engaged directors with the appropriate resources and structure to enhance stockholder value, without delegating all responsibilities to the Chief Executive Officer.

Effective May 2, 2016, Mr. Anderson is Executive Chairman and Mr. Blake is lead director. Mr. Blake will preside at the executive sessions of the Board routinely held without the chief executive officer or any other management director, and he and Mr. Anderson will work together to divide the other responsibilities previously performed by the non-executive chairman.

Board Committees

The Board of Directors has established the following committees to assist it in discharging its responsibilities:

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee met nine times in 2015. Among other matters, the Committee:

Appoints (subject to stockholder ratification) our independent auditors;

represents and assists the Board in its oversight of:

the integrity of our financial statements

legal and regulatory matters, including compliance with applicable laws and regulations

our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance

the performance of our internal audit department;

reviews audits and other work product of the independent auditors and internal audit department;

discusses the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting;

oversees our compliance with procedures and processes pertaining to corporate ethics and standards of business conduct;

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.11GOVERNANCE MATTERS


reviews and, if appropriate, approves or ratifies:

possible conflicts of interest involving members of the Board or executive officers

transactions that would be subject to disclosure under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K;

considers complaints concerning accounting, auditing, internal control and financial reporting matters;

reviews the enterprise risk management process by which management identifies, assesses and manages Delta’s exposure to risk; discusses major risk exposures with management; apprises the Board of Directors of risk exposures and management’s actions to monitor and manage risk; and reviews the Company’s insurance programs; and

focuses on tone at the top and chooses key topics for detailed review.

Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporate Governance Committee met five times in 2015. Among other matters, the Committee:

leads the search and recruiting process for new outside directors and identifies and recommends qualified individuals to the Board of Directors for nomination as directors; considers stockholder nominations of candidates for election as directors; and

considers, develops and makes recommendations to the Board regarding matters related to corporate governance, including:

governance standards

qualifications and eligibility requirements for Board members, including director independence standards

the Board’s size, composition, organization and processes

the type, function, size, membership and chairs of Board committees

evaluation of the Board’s performance

legal and regulatory changes in corporate governance

political contributions reports

the compensation of non-employee directors.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee met 13 times in 2015. Among other matters, the Committee:

reviews and makes recommendations, where appropriate, to the Board regarding:

financial planning and financial structure

financings and guarantees

capital expenditures, including fleet acquisition

annual and longer-term operating plans

capital structure, including issuances and repurchases of capital stock and other securities

risk management practices and policies concerning investments and hedging, both financial and non-financial, including swaps

balance sheet strategies

GOVERNANCE MATTERS12DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


derivatives management, fuel hedging and oversight of Delta’s oil and fuel management;

approves commitments, capital expenditures and debt financings and re-financings, subject to certain limits.

Personnel & Compensation Committee

The Personnel & Compensation Committee met seven times in 2015. Among other matters, the Committee:

establishes general compensation philosophy and oversees the development and implementation of compensation programs;

performs an annual performance evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer and determines and approves the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation;

reviews and approves compensation programs for executive officers;

reviews and regularly approves the management succession plan;

makes recommendations to the Board regarding election of officers; and

selects, retains, terminates, and approves fees of compensation advisors to the Committee.

Safety and Security Committee

The Safety and Security Committee met five times in 2015. Among other matters, the Committee:

oversees and consults with management regarding customer, employee and aircraft operating safety and security, including related goals, performance and initiatives by:

reviewing current and proposed safety and security-related programs, policies and compliance matters

reviewing matters with a material effect on Delta’s flight safety operations and security

establishing and approving annual safety and security goals

reviewing the safety and security programs and performance of the Delta Connection carriers

reviewing the security of the Company’s information technology systems and operations, including defenses against cyber threats to the airline.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

The Board of Directors has ultimate responsibility to oversee Delta’s enterprise risk management program (“ERM”). The Board discusses risk throughout the year, particularly when reviewing operating and strategic plans and when considering specific actions for approval. Depending on the nature of the risk, the responsibility for oversight of selected risks may be delegated to appropriate committees of the Board of Directors, with material findings reported to the full Board. Delegations of risk oversight by the Board include:

The Audit Committee reviews the ERM framework at the enterprise level; reviews management’s process for identifying, managing and assessing risk; and oversees the management of risks related to the integrity of the consolidated financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, the internal audit function and related matters.

The Finance Committee oversees the management of risks related to aircraft fuel price and fuel hedging; foreign currency and interest rate hedging; Delta’s financial condition and capital structure; its financing, acquisition and investment transactions and related matters.

The Personnel & Compensation Committee reviews risks related to management succession and Delta’s executive compensation program.

The Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks related to Board of Directors’ succession and Delta’s corporate governance matters.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.13GOVERNANCE MATTERS


The Safety and Security Committee oversees the management of risks related to customer, employee, aircraft and airport operating safety and security and information technology safety and security.

The Board of Directors receives reports from the committee chairs at regularly scheduled Board meetings. Management reports to the Board and the committees with oversight of specific risks concerning matters such as compliance with regulations, business strategies, proposed changes in laws and regulations and any other matter deemed appropriate by the Board or the committees.

Under Delta’s ERM process, management is responsible for setting risk tolerance levels; defining organizational responsibilities for risk management; determining the significant risks to Delta; developing risk mitigation and management strategies, based on Delta’s risk tolerance levels; and monitoring the business to determine that risk mitigation activities are in place and operating. Management periodically updates its assessment of risks to Delta as emerging risks are identified.

Delta’s internal audit function, which is led by the Vice President — Corporate Audit and Enterprise Risk Management, is responsible for supporting and coordinating management’s ERM process and activities; documenting risk assessments using a consistent approach; identifying and validating controls to mitigate risk; and reporting on results of risk evaluations. The Vice President — Corporate Audit and Enterprise Risk Management reports to the Audit Committee regarding ERM activities.

The Board of Directors believes that Delta’s leadership structure, combined with the roles of the Board and its committees, provides the appropriate leadership for effective risk oversight.

GOVERNANCE MATTERS14DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

All Delta Directors are elected annually. At the annual meeting, each director will be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast. This means the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed 50% of the votes with respect to that director (excluding abstentions). Each director elected will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and the election of his or her successor.

Delta’s Bylaws provide that any director not elected by a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting must offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors whether to accept the resignation. The Board of Directors will consider the recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days after the certification of the election results.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following nominees:

(1)        Richard H. Anderson

 

(8)       Mickey P. Foret

(2)        Edward H. Bastian

(9)        Shirley C. Franklin

(3)        Francis S. Blake

(10)     George N. Mattson

(4)        Daniel A. Carp

(11)     Douglas R. Ralph

(5)        David G. DeWalt

(12)     Sergio A. L. Rial

(6)        Thomas E. Donilon

(13)     Kathy N. Waller

(7)        William H. Easter III

(14)     Kenneth B. Woodrow  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     17


AllBack to Contents

SHARE OWNERSHIP

Beneficial Ownership of the nominees are currently serving on the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors believes each nominee for director will be able to stand for election. If any nominee becomes unable to stand for election, the Board may name a substitute nominee or reduce the number of directors. If a substitute nominee is chosen, the directors designated to vote the proxies will vote FOR the substitute nominee.Securities

Delta, the Air Line Pilots Association, International, the collective bargaining representative for Delta pilots (“ALPA”), and the Delta Master Executive Council, the governing body of the Delta unit of ALPA (“Delta MEC”), have an agreement whereby Delta agrees (1) to cause the election to the Board of Directors of a Delta pilot designated by the Delta MEC who is not a member or officer of the Delta MEC or an officer of ALPA (“Pilot Nominee”); (2) at any meeting of stockholders at which the Pilot Nominee is subject to election, to re-nominate the Pilot Nominee or nominate another qualified Delta pilot designated by the Delta MEC to be elected to the Board of Directors and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause such person to be elected to the Board; and (3) in the event of the Pilot Nominee’s death, disability, resignation, removal or failure to be elected, to elect promptly to the Board a replacement Pilot Nominee designated by the Delta MEC to fill the resulting vacancy. Pursuant to this provision, the Delta MEC has designated Douglas R. Ralph to be nominated for election to the Board at the annual meeting.

The compensation of Mr. Ralph as a Delta pilot is determined under the collective bargaining agreement between Delta and ALPA. During 2015, Mr. Ralph received $321,271 in compensation (which includes: $255,973 in flight earnings, $30,298 in shared rewards/profit sharing payments and $35,000 in Delta contributions to a defined contribution plan). As a Delta pilot, Mr. Ralph is not separately compensated for his service as a director.

Certain Information About Nominees

Delta believes each nominee has a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards; demonstrated business acumen and the exercise of sound judgment; and a track record of service as a leader in business or governmental settings. Delta also believes it is important for directors and nominees for director to have experience in one or more of the following areas:

As a chief executive or member of senior management of a large public or private company or in a leadership position in a governmental setting

Airline or other transportation industries

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.15PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Marketing

Financial and/or accounting

Risk management

Energy industry

International business

Information technology expertise

Global security and government affairs experience

As a board member of a large public or private company

The Board of Directors has fixed the size of the Board at fourteen members effective at the annual meeting. The following section provides information about each nominee for director, including the experience that led the Board of Directors to conclude the nominee should serve as a director of Delta.

Richard H. AndersonAge 60Joined Delta’s Board April 30, 2007

Mr. Anderson has served as Chief Executive Officer of Delta from 2007 until May 2, 2016. Effective on May 2, Mr. Anderson is the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Anderson should serve as a director include Mr. Anderson’s experience serving as the Chief Executive Officer of Delta and Northwest Airlines, Inc. and over 20 years of business and operational experience in the airline industry. He has also served as a senior executive of a Fortune 20 healthcare company, as well as on the boards of directors of public companies other than Delta.

Directorships:

Medtronic, PLC; Cargill, Inc.

Affiliations:

Board of Metro Atlanta Chamber

Edward H. BastianAge 58Joined Delta’s Board February 5, 2010

Mr. Bastian has been President of Delta since 2007. He is the Chief Executive Officer of Delta, effective on May 2, 2016. He was President of Delta and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Airlines, Inc. from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Bastian was President and Chief Financial Officer of Delta from 2007 to 2008; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Delta from 2005 to 2007; Chief Financial Officer of Acuity Brands from June 2005 to July 2005; Senior Vice President — Finance and Controller of Delta from 2000 to 2005 and Vice President and Controller of Delta from 1998 to 2000.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Bastian should serve as a director include Mr. Bastian’s over fifteen years of experience as a Delta officer, including serving as Delta’s President, Delta’s Chief Restructuring Officer during its Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding and Northwest Airlines Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer after the merger. Mr. Bastian’s accounting and finance background provides financial and strategic expertise to the Board of Directors.

Directorships:

GOL Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes, S.A.; Grupo Aeroméxico, S.A.B. de C.V.

Affiliations:

Member, Board of Woodruff Arts Center

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS16DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Francis S. BlakeAge 66Joined Delta’s Board July 25, 2014

Mr. Blake served as the Chairman of The Home Depot from 2007 until his retirement in February 2015. He is the lead director of Delta’s Board of Directors effective May 2, 2016. He was the CEO of The Home Depot from 2007 to November 2014 and previously served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and its Executive Vice President. He joined The Home Depot in 2002 as Executive Vice President - Business Development and Corporate Operations. Mr. Blake was previously the deputy secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy and served in a variety of executive positions at General Electric Company, including as Senior Vice President, Corporate Business Development in charge of all worldwide mergers, acquisitions and dispositions worldwide.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Blake should serve as a director include his experience as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a complex retail organization and prior leadership positions in business and government. He has also served on boards of directors of public companies in the energy industry. At other public companies, Mr. Blake has experience as a member of the audit and governance committees.

Committees:

Audit; Corporate Governance (Chair)

Directorships:

Macy’s, Inc.; The Procter & Gamble Company

Daniel A. CarpAge 67Joined Delta’s Board April 30, 2007

Mr. Carp served as non-executive Chairman of Delta’s Board of Directors from 2007 until May 2016. He was Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Eastman Kodak Company from 2000 to 2005. Mr. Carp was President of Eastman Kodak Company from 1997 to 2003.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Carp should serve as a director include Mr. Carp’s substantial business experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a multinational public company in the consumer goods and services sector, where he was employed for over 35 years. As a member of the boards of directors of large public companies other than Delta, Mr. Carp has experience on audit, compensation, finance and governance committees.

Committees:

Corporate Governance; Personnel & Compensation (Chair)

Directorships:

Norfolk Southern Corporation; Texas Instruments Inc.

David G. DeWaltAge 51Joined Delta’s Board November 22, 2011

Mr. DeWalt has been the Chief Executive Officer of FireEye, Inc., a global network cyber security company, since November 2012 and Chairman of its board since June 2012. Mr. DeWalt was President and Chief Executive Officer of McAfee, Inc., a security technology company, from 2007 until 2011 when McAfee, Inc. was acquired by Intel Corporation. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. DeWalt held executive positions with EMC Corporation, a provider of information infrastructure technology and solutions, including serving as Executive Vice President and President-Customer Operations and Content Management Software.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. DeWalt should serve as a director include Mr. DeWalt’s substantial expertise in the information technology security industry and his strategic and operational experience as the current Chief Executive Officer of FireEye, Inc. and former Chief Executive Officer of McAfee, Inc. As a member of the boards of directors of public companies other than Delta, Mr. DeWalt has served on the audit and compensation committees.

Committees:

Corporate Governance; Safety & Security

Directorships:

FireEye, Inc.; Five9, Inc.; Jive Software, Inc. (2011-2013); Polycom Inc. (2005-2013)

Affiliations:

National Security & Technology Advisory Committee

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.17PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Thomas E. DonilonAge 60Joined Delta’s Board February 20, 2015

Mr. Donilon is a partner and vice chair of the international law firm of O’Melveny & Myers. Prior to rejoining O’Melveny in 2014, Mr. Donilon served in the administration of President Barack Obama, most recently as national security advisor. In that capacity, he oversaw the U.S. National Security Council staff, chaired the cabinet-level National Security Principals Committee, and was responsible for the coordination and integration of the administration’s foreign policy, intelligence and military efforts. Mr. Donilon also served as the President’s personal emissary to a number of world leaders. Over the past three decades, Mr. Donilon has worked closely with and advised two other U.S. Presidents. In February 2016, the President appointed Mr. Donilon as Chair of the Commission to Enhance National Cybersecurity.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Donilon should serve as a director include his extensive experience and unique expertise and insight into global security and international strategic matters, his service at the highest levels of the U.S. government and his role as a legal advisor to public company boards and a range of other sophisticated business clients.

Committees:

Finance; Safety and Security

Affiliations:

Distinguished Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations; Non-resident Senior Fellow; Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; Distinguished Fellow, Asia Society Policy Institute; Honorary Trustee at the Brookings Institution; Member, Aspen Strategy Group; Member, the Trilateral Commission; Member, the Center on Global Energy Policy Advisory Board at Columbia University; Member, U.S. Defense Policy Board; Member, Central Intelligence Agency’s External Advisory Board; Chair, Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity

William H. Easter IIIAge 66Joined Delta’s Board December 3, 2012

Mr. Easter was Chairman, President and CEO of DCP Midstream LLC (formerly Duke Energy Field Services, LLC) from 2004 until his retirement in 2008. Previously employed by ConocoPhillips for 32 years, Mr. Easter served as Vice President of State Government Affairs from 2002 to 2004 and as General Manager of the Gulf Coast Refining, Marketing and Transportation Business Unit from 1998 to 2002.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Easter should serve as a director include over 36 years of leadership and operational experience in natural gas, crude oil and refined product supply, transportation, refining and marketing with ConocoPhillips and DCP Midstream LLC. Additionally, Mr. Easter has experience as a member of the boards of directors of other public companies where he served on the audit, corporate governance, compensation and finance committees. Since his retirement from DCP Midstream, LLC, Mr. Easter has been involved in private investments.

Committees:

Audit (Chair); Corporate Governance

Directorships:

BakerHughes, Inc.; Concho Resources, Inc.; Sunoco, Inc. (2011-2012)

Affiliations:

Member, Board of Memorial Hermann Hospital System, Houston, Texas

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS18DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Mickey P. ForetAge 70Joined Delta’s Board October 29, 2008

Mr. Foret was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northwest Airlines, Inc. from 1998 to 2002, and also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Cargo from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Foret served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Atlas Air, Inc. from 1996 to 1997 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northwest Airlines, Inc. from 1993 to 1996.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Foret should serve as a director include Mr. Foret’s experience in the airline industry, where he held numerous senior executive positions for over 35 years, particularly in the finance area. He served as Chief Financial Officer of Northwest Airlines, Inc. for seven years. Mr. Foret has also served on the audit, compensation, finance and governance committees of the boards of directors of other public companies.

Committees:

Audit; Safety and Security (Chair)

Directorships:

SpartanNash; URS Corporation (2003-2014); Nash Finch Company (2005-2013)

Shirley C. FranklinAge 70Joined Delta’s Board July 20, 2011

Ms. Franklin has been Executive Chair of the Board of Purpose Built Communities, Inc., a national non-profit organization established to transform struggling neighborhoods into sustainable communities, since 2011. Since 2013, Ms. Franklin has also served as the Barbara Jordan Visiting Professor at the University of Texas-Austin, LBJ School of Public Affairs. Ms. Franklin served as Mayor of the City of Atlanta from 2002 to 2010 and served in cabinet positions in the City of Atlanta, including Chief of Operations and Chief Administrative Officer, from 1978 to 1991, prior to her election as mayor in 2001.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Ms. Franklin should serve as a director include Ms. Franklin’s extensive executive leadership experience, business experience and financial expertise. She has over 38 years of leadership experience in various positions in city government and other organizations, including her eight years as Mayor of Atlanta. She has also served on the audit committee of a board of directors of a public company other than Delta.

Committees:

Audit; Personnel & Compensation

Directorships:

Mueller Water Products, Inc.

Affiliations:

Atlanta Regional Commission on Homelessness (Co-Chair); National Center for Civil and Human Rights (Chair); United Way of Metropolitan Atlanta Endowment Foundation; The Volcker Alliance (member)

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.19PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


George N. MattsonAge 50Joined Delta’s Board October 1, 2012

Mr. Mattson served as a partner and co-head of the Global Industrials Group in Investment Banking at Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 2002 through August 2012, where he served in a variety of positions from 1994 to 2002. Mr. Mattson was an Associate at Credit Suisse First Boston from 1993 to 1994, and he held various sales and marketing positions at IBM from 1987 to 1993.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Mattson should serve as a director include Mr. Mattson’s experience in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and capital markets. In addition, Mr. Mattson has knowledge of the airline industry and other global industries acquired during his 18 years at Goldman, Sachs & Co., including as co-head of the Global Industrials Group in Investment Banking, which had responsibility for a diverse set of industry sectors, including companies in the transportation industry. Since his retirement from Goldman Sachs, Mr. Mattson has been involved in acquiring and growing middle market industrial businesses.

Committees:

Finance (Chair); Personnel & Compensation

Affiliations:

Member, Board of The Boys’ Club of New York (Chair, Investment Committee); Member, Vice Chair Board of Visitors of the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University

Douglas R. RalphAge 61Joined Delta’s Board June 25, 2015

Mr. Ralph has been a Delta pilot since 1991 and is currently a Captain of a Boeing 767ER aircraft. He was an active duty pilot in the U.S. Marine Corps for six years prior to joining Delta. He was then a pilot in the U.S. Naval Reserves for 17 years, retiring with the rank of Captain in 2001. Mr. Ralph has been designated by the Delta MEC as the Pilot Nominee. Prior to joining the Board of Directors, Mr. Ralph was the Chair of the Investor Relations Committee of the Delta MEC and also served on a Government Affairs Committee for the Delta MEC.

Experience:

As a pilot designated by the Delta MEC to serve on the Board of Directors, Mr. Ralph provides a unique perspective into the airline industry and related labor relations matters.

Committees:

Finance; Safety & Security

Sergio A. L. RialAge 55Joined Delta’s Board December 9, 2014

Mr. Rial has been Chief Executive Officer since January 2016 of Banco Santander Brazil, the third largest private bank in Brazil and a member of Santander Group, the largest bank in the Eurozone. Mr. Rial served as Chairman of Banco Santander Brazil from February 2015 until January 2016. From 2012 to February 2015, Mr. Rial was Chief Executive Officer of Marfrig Global Foods, one of the world’s largest meat companies with operations in Brazil and 15 other countries. Prior to joining Marfrig in 2012, Mr. Rial served in various leadership capacities with Cargill, Inc., a Minneapolis-based global provider of food, agriculture, financial and industrial products and services. At Cargill, Mr. Rial served as Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2011 and Executive Vice President from 2011 to 2012. He was also a member of Cargill’s board of directors from 2010 to 2012. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Rial was a senior managing director and co-head of the Investment Banking Division at Bear Stearns & Co. in New York after serving at ABN AMRO Bank for 18 years.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Rial should serve as a director include his experience as a chief executive officer in global business, particularly in the key market of Latin America, and his extensive financial experience as a chief financial officer of a global corporation. He has also served on boards of directors of public companies in the food and agricultural industry.

Committees:

Audit; Personnel & Compensation

Directorships:

Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A. (2010-2015); The Mosaic Company (2010-2011)

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS20DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Kathy N. WallerAge 57Joined Delta’s Board July 24, 2015

Ms. Waller has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company since 2014. Ms. Waller joined Coca-Cola in 1987 as a senior accountant and has assumed roles of increasing responsibility during her career, including Vice President, Finance and Controller.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Ms. Waller should serve as a director include her extensive financial experience with a global business enterprise, including her role as Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Waller’s accounting and finance background provides financial and strategic expertise to the Board of Directors.

Committees:

Corporate Governance; Finance

Directorships:

Monster Beverage Corporation; Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.

Kenneth B. WoodrowAge 71Joined Delta’s Board July 1, 2004

Mr. Woodrow was Vice Chairman of Target Corporation from 1999 until his retirement in December 2000. He served as President of Target Corporation from 1994 until 1999 and held other management positions in that company from 1971 until 1994.

Experience:

The qualifications that led the Board of Directors to conclude that Mr. Woodrow should serve as a director include Mr. Woodrow’s nearly 30 years of experience in marketing, operations and finance at a public company with a large number of general merchandise retail stores throughout the United States. Mr. Woodrow held positions during that time that included Vice Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Woodrow has experience as a member of the boards of directors of two other public companies where he served on audit, finance and governance committees.

Committees:

Finance; Personnel & Compensation

Affiliations:

Former Chairman of the Board and Current Life Trustee, Hamline University

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.21PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

Directors, Nominees for Director and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the number of shares of Delta common stock beneficially owned as of April 18, 2016,15, 2020, by each director and director-nominee,director nominee, each person named in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement, and all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the owner exercises sole voting and investment power over the shares.

Name of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

(1)

Directors:

Richard H. Anderson

2,977,754 (2)

Edward H. Bastian

1,154,044

(2)

913,506 (2)(3)

Francis S. Blake

18,065

Roy J. Bostock53,335

91,128 (4)

John S. Brinzo

50,773

Daniel A. Carp

48,253

Ashton B. Carter

59,533

10,000

David G. DeWalt

41,000

Thomas E. Donilon54,720

7,140

William H. Easter III

48,170

37,450

Mickey P. ForetChristopher A. Hazelton

300

73,078 (2)

Shirley C. FranklinMichael P. Huerta

9,825

39,950

David R. GoodeJeanne P. Jackson

13,100

73,173

George N. Mattson

40,940

Douglas R. Ralph105,660

0

(3)

Sergio A.L. Rial

15,597

David S. Taylor

6,182

7,960

Kathy N. Waller

17,350

3,630

Kenneth B. WoodrowNamedExecutiveOfficers:

73,173

Named Executive Officers:

Glen W. Hauenstein

615,745

(2)

W. Gil West

369,825

380,210

(2)

Paul A. Jacobson

647,835

(2)(4)

492,631 (2)(5)

Peter W. Gil WestCarter

211,254

118,990

(2)

DirectorsandExecutiveOfficersasaGroup (24 (21Persons)

4,050,058

5,815,009(2)

(1)

Each of the individuals listed in the table and the directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned less than 1% of the shares of common stock outstanding on April 18, 2016.15, 2020.

(2)

Includes the following number of shares of common stock which a director or named executive officer has the right to acquire upon the exercise of stock options that were exercisable as of April 18, 2016,15, 2020, or that will become exercisable within 60 days after that date:

Name

Number of Shares

Richard H. Anderson

2,441,927

Edward H. Bastian

605,704

Mickey P. Foret747,984

9,146

Glen W. Hauenstein

299,397

W. Gil West

204,100

257,627

Paul A. Jacobson

147,357

Peter W. Carter

164,000

95,874

Directors & Executive Officers as a Group

3,522,060

1,822,590

 

(3)

Includes 5,5002,000 shares held by a family foundation,trust for the benefit of Mr. Mattson’s adult son, over which Mr. Bastian and his wife are the directors.Mattson has shared investment power.

(4)

Includes 35,618 shares held by a family foundation, of which Mr. Bostock, his wife and children and their spouses are directors.

(5)

Includes 25,00029,000 shares held by a family foundation, of which Mr. Jacobson and his wife are the trustees.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES22DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     18


Back to Contents

Beneficial Owners of More than 5% of Voting Stock

The following table provides information about the following entities known to Delta to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of Delta’s outstanding common stock as of April 18, 2016.15, 2020.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature
of

Beneficial
Ownership

Percentage of
Class

The Vanguard GroupBerkshireHathawayInc.

58,900,759(1)

9.23%

3555 Farnam Street
Omaha, NE 68131

TheVanguardGroup

43,812,141(2)

43,325,413 (1)5.6

6.87%

100 Vanguard Blvd


Malvern, PA 19355

BlackRock,Inc.

34,386,285(3)

41,605,330 (2)5.4

5.39%

55 East 52nd52nd Street


New York, NY 10055

 

(1)

Based on a Form 4 filed April 3, 2020, in which Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. reported that, as of April 1, 2020, it may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of shares owned by its wholly-owned subsidiaries National Indemnity Company (51,907,636) and Government Employees Insurance Company (6,993,123). In Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2020, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. indicated it had shared voting and dispositive power over all shares owned by these subsidiaries.

(2) 

Based on Schedule 13G13G/A filed February 11, 2016,10, 2020, in which The Vanguard Group reported that, as of December 31, 2015,2019, it had sole voting power over 1,290,118717,016 of these shares, shared voting power over 41,583 of these shares, sole dispositive power over 42,004,99543,068,506 of these shares and shared dispositive power over 1,320,418743,635 of these shares.

(2)
(3) 

Based on Schedule 13G13G/A filed February 9, 2016,5, 2020, in which BlackRock, Inc. reported that, as of December 31, 2015,2019, it had sole voting power over 36,011,87830,390,151 of these shares and sole dispositive power over 41,536,293 of these shares, and shared dispositive power over 69,037all of these shares.

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.23BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     19


Back to ContentsEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Note from the Chairman of the Personnel & Compensation Committee

In the last few years, we have shared with you a summary of the previous year’s highlights and the connection between Delta’s outstanding operational and financial performance and the compensation paid to our executives. Without question, 2019 was a successful year for Delta allowing us to pay out $1.6 billion in profit sharing to our front-line employees. But as our business has been disrupted and all of our lives have changed in 2020, I want to share with you the actions we have been and are taking on executive compensation in response to the crisis brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

As the rapid spread of COVID-19 became a pandemic, delivering a devastating blow to the company’s business, the Board and management of Delta took quick action with respect to current compensation to lead the way in preserving cash and bolstering liquidity. As of April 15, these actions have included:

Ed Bastian, our CEO, forgoing his salary for six months beginning April 1;

Members of our executive leadership team, including the named executive officers, taking a 50% pay cut for six months beginning April 1;

All other officers taking a 50% pay cut for 90 days beginning April 1;

Managing director- and director-level employees taking a 25% pay cut for 90 days beginning April 1; and

Board members waiving their cash retainers for six months.

The core competitive strength of Delta has always been and will continue to be its people and values-based culture. In these times of uncertainty, more than ever, it will be our talent that sets us apart. During this crisis, the Board and I have once again witnessed the strength and commitment of Delta’s people, including our leadership team. We recognize the extraordinary efforts of this team in guiding the airline through this difficult period, and we have every confidence that those efforts will continue as the company moves out of the immediate crisis and begins the road toward recovery from its devastating impact to our business. Therefore, the ability to both retain our talented leaders and attract new ones when needed has been and will continue to be a strong focus for this committee.

Pay for performance has long been at the core of Delta’s compensation philosophy and our program has always placed a significant portion of our executive’s compensation at risk based both on the achievement of challenging business goals as well as the performance of our stock price. As a result of this structure and the impact of COVID-19, the compensation they have received over the past few years is worth significantly less than when it was awarded, declining by more than half of its grant date value.

In addition, the performance measures and goals we approved in early February 2020, especially under our annual incentive plan, no longer reflect our current reality. This crisis will not just affect Delta over the near-term; like many companies, our longer-term business strategies must also be carefully considered when we fully understand the extent of the impact. In the coming months, this Committee will need to reevaluate our incentive plans to ensure they reflect goals that focus our company and our leadership team on Delta’s path to recovery and a strong future.

Even though I will be retiring from the Board prior to the annual meeting, I leave knowing that the Committee is well positioned to support Delta and its employees during this time.

Thank you for your continued support of Delta.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     20


Back to Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section of the proxy statement provides an overview and analysis of our executive compensation program. It discusses our executive compensation philosophy and objectives, the administration of the executive compensation program and the material elements of the program. It also reviews the actions taken by the Personnel & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “P&C Committee”) in 2015 anddescribes the compensation of our named executive officers who were:for 2019. It also discusses how our executive compensation program reflects our compensation philosophy and objectives, including the importance of linking pay to performance.

 

2019 Named Executive Officers

Name

Position

EDWARD H. BASTIAN

Richard H. Anderson — Chief Executive Officer

GLEN W. HAUENSTEIN

President

W. GIL WEST

Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

PAUL A. JACOBSON

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

PETER W. CARTER

Executive Vice President & Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

 

Edward H. Bastian — PresidentHUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Glen W. Hauenstein — Executive Vice PresidentWe believe Delta’s most important competitive advantage is our approximately 90,000 employees who are the face of our brand. Effectively attracting, engaging, developing, retaining and rewarding our people is a priority of Delta and its Board of Directors. In February 2020, the Board approved updates to the Personnel & Chief Revenue Officer

Paul A. Jacobson — Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

W. Gil West — Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

Effective May 2, 2016, Mr. Anderson isCompensation Committee’s charter to memorialize the Executive ChairmanCommittee’s role in oversight of the Board of Directors, Mr. Bastian is the Chief Executive Officer succeeding Mr. Andersonpolicies and Mr. Hauenstein is President succeeding Mr. Bastian. Effective February 3, 2016, Mr. West was promotedstrategies relating to Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer.human capital management.

Our Employee CommitmentExecutive Summary

Our performance in 2015.Delta had a successful 2015, with strong financial results, continued revenue momentum, excellent operational performance and investments in network, airports, fleet and technology. The following key accomplishments in 2015 helped make Delta the carrier of choice for passengers and position the Company for further success in 2016:

Strong financial results*

Excluding special items, earned pre-tax income of $5.9 billion, an increase of 29% over 2014 and Delta’s sixth consecutive year of solid profitability, with 3.2 points of pre-tax margin expansion.

Free cash flow of $3.8 billion and the return of $2.6 billion to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Reduced adjusted net debt to $6.7 billion, a $600 million reduction from 2014 and more than a $10 billion reduction from 2009.

Generated over 20% return on invested capital, the sixth year in a row we had returns that met or exceeded our cost of capital.

Continued revenue momentum

Expanded operating revenue to $40.7 billion, a $342 million increase over 2014.

Generated a unit revenue premium relative to the industry for the fifth year in a row.

Excellent operating performance

Maintained strong operating performance with a mainline on-time arrival rate of 85.8%, a flight completion factor of 99.6% — achieving 161 days of zero mainline cancellations and continued our 1st place performance in fewest Department of Transportation (“DOT”) customer complaints among the major network carriers.

* See “Supplemental Information about Financial Measures” at the end of this proxy statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, and the reasons we use non-GAAP financial measures. On a GAAP basis for 2015, pre-tax income was $7.2 billion and debt and capital lease obligations were $8.3 billion.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION24DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Based on DOT measures, these results put Delta at the top of the industry in operational reliability and customer service for major global carriers.

Investments in network, airports, fleet and technology

Continued our joint venture with Virgin Atlantic, increasing our presence at London’s Heathrow Airport.

In New York, we are continuing renovations at our facilities at LaGuardia to support our expanded domestic operations and we opened the expanded and thoroughly enhanced Terminal 4 at New York’s JFK International Airport and announced an additional expansion of Terminal 4.

Focused on growing Seattle into a major international gateway, with expanded service and investments in airport facilities.

Continued our fleet restructuring to replace 50-seat regional jets and other older, less cost effective aircraft with newer, more efficient Boeing 737-900, Boeing 717 and CRJ-900 aircraft.

Continued to make significant functionality and performance improvements to delta.com and our award-winning mobile applications to add more customer-focused functions.

Other company highlights

Received recognition from leading organizations and publications, including being named, for the fifth time in six years,Fortune’sMost Admired Airline; won numerous airline industry awards sweeping the major corporate travel surveys, includingBusiness Travel Newsand Travel Weekly; and was named a Best Place to Work in 2016 in Glassdoor’s Employees’ Choice Awards.

Recognized as a national leader in our commitment to anti-human trafficking efforts and continued to provide training to customer-facing employees to help identify and report suspected instances of human trafficking.

Our employee commitment.    Delta’s employees are critical to the Company’s success. Ourdelivered strong financial, operational and customer service results in 20152019. This would not have been possible without the dedication and determination of our employees.people. During 2015,2019, we continued our commitment to promoting a culture of open, honest and direct communications, making Delta a great place to work and building an environment that encourages diversity, integrity and respect. Key actions

In 2020, we have been humbled by the continued dedication and determination of our people in 2015 include:

Payingresponse to the challenges Delta is facing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only have they graciously accepted a record $1.5 billion under Delta’s broad-based profit sharing program (the “Profit Sharing Program”)temporary reduction in recognition of the achievementswork hours as we have had to reduce our operations, but 37,000 of our employees have volunteered to take unpaid leaves of absence ranging from 30 days to one year in duration. And we have supported them through this crisis as well in a variety of ways, including covering the cost of employee benefit premiums for unpaid leave takers, providing special COVID-19-related pay protection, and more. We have long known that our people and our culture are the foundations of our success and the sacrifices they have made during this time are a true testament to the Delta difference.

Investing nearly $13 billion

in our people, which includes salaries, pension funding, health and welfare benefits, 401(k) plan contributions, the Profit Sharing and Shared Rewards Programs, training and travel benefits. Key actions in 2019 include:

Profit Sharing Program

Paying $1.6 billion in February 2020 under the Profit Sharing Program in recognition of the achievements of our employees in meeting Delta’s financial targets in 2019 — the largest in our history and the sixth consecutive year our employees received payouts exceeding $1 billion.

Shared Rewards Program

Awarding $84 million under Delta’s broad-based shared rewards program (Shared Rewards Program) based on the hard work of our employees in meeting key operational performance goals during 2019 (on-time arrival, baggage handling, flight completion factors and net promoter score), recognizing that superior performance by our front-line employees directly affects customer satisfaction.

Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit Retirement Plans

Contributing over $2 billion to Delta’s broad-based defined contribution and defined benefit retirement plans. This included $1 billion in excess contributions to our defined benefit plans.

Health and Wellness Benefits

Investing more than $800 million in comprehensive health and wellness benefits. This included medical and dental benefits, amounts paid directly to employees through Delta’s incentive-based wellness program, as well as mental health benefits.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     21


Back to Contents

In addition to these significant investments, we strive to make Delta a great place to work by listening to our employees so we can provide programs and resources that fully engage them, help them deepen their skill sets and further their careers at Delta. We are committed to creating a diverse and inclusive workforce, empowering professional growth and development and investing in our employees’ physical, emotional and financial health and wellness. We are also committed to internal pay parity based on role, qualifications, experience and merit.

These efforts have been recognized internally and, as shown below, externally. In a 2019 employee survey in which more than 37,000 Delta people participated (over 40% of Delta’s financial targets for the year, providing each eligible employee with a payout of 21.4% of eligible earnings.employees), 81% said they are happy to work at Delta.

 

Awarding $95 million under Delta’s broad-based shared rewards program (the “Shared Rewards Program”) based on

Talent Planning and Development

Talent planning and development are important at all levels within Delta—from the hard work of our employees in meeting on-time arrival, baggage handling and flight completion factor performance goals during 2015.

Contributing almost $1.8 billion to Delta’s broad-based defined contribution and defined benefit retirement plans, including $600 million in excess contributionsexecutive ranks to our defined benefit plans.

Implementing base salary increasesfrontline employees. The Personnel & Compensation Committee continued to make this effort a high priority in 2019 and it will be the highest priority in the months to come. The Board of 4%Directors is regularly updated on key talent indicators for our frontlineleaders, including recruiting and merit employees in April 2015development programs. The Board members interact with potential future leaders through formal presentations and in December 2015, providing an additional base salary increaseinformal events.

Diversity and Inclusion

As a global airline, we believe that our company must reflect the diversity of 14.5% forthe world and serve as a model of inclusiveness. With a goal to strengthen our non-executive employees (excluding pilots)connections from the inside out, Delta’s diversity and inclusion strategy focuses on three strategic imperatives: seeking diversity, promoting inclusion and driving accountability. This effort is driven by Delta’s Diversity & Inclusion Council — a senior cross-divisional group that meets regularly to evaluate corporate and divisional metrics, programs and proposals that align with the company’s strategic imperatives. The Personnel & Compensation Committee oversees the company’s progress with this strategy and has incorporated a diversity update as an offset to changes being made to their profit sharing formula in 2016.

Increasing total company contributions to a maximum of 8% of an employee’s eligible earnings under our broad-based ground and flight attendant defined contribution plan (401(k) plan) in January 2016.

Investing over $10 billion in our people, which includes salaries, pension funding, health insurance, 401(k) contributions, Profit Sharing Program, Shared Rewards Program, life insurance, disability and survivor benefits, travel benefits and training.

standing meeting agenda item.

 

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     22


Back to Contents

Administration of the Executive Compensation Program

PERSONNEL & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Personnel & Compensation Committee oversees and approves Delta’s executive compensation program to reinforce our culture by ensuring a strong connection between pay and performance as well as alignment between our executives, employees and shareholders. This includes:

Establishing Delta’s executive compensation philosophy and objectives in consultation with an independent compensation consultant and company management

Overseeing the development and implementation of our executive compensation programs

Reviewing and approving the compensation structure and performance measures for our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers

Evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in meeting corporate goals and objectives

Reviewing and advising the Board of Directors on management succession planning

Overseeing Delta’s policies and strategies relating to talent development and human capital management, including diversity and inclusion

Making recommendations to the Board of Directors on the election of officers

Reviewing tally sheets, competitive market data for our peer group, and individual contributions to establish target compensation for our executive officers

INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

In 2019, after considering the factors provided under the NYSE listing standards and Item 407(e)(3)(iii) of SEC Regulation SK, the Personnel & Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook) as its executive compensation consultant. In this role, FW Cook provides advice to our Personnel & Compensation Committee regarding Delta’s executive and director compensation programs. This includes:

Providing advice regarding Delta’s executive compensation programs based on the company’s business strategy, compensation philosophy, prevailing market practices and relevant regulatory mandates

Providing annual recommendations directly to the Personnel & Compensation Committee on Chief Executive Officer compensation

Advising the Corporate Governance Committee on the compensation for the non-executive Chairman of the Board and non-employee directors

Providing advice on the Company’s compensation peer group

Updating and advising the Personnel & Compensation Committee on key executive compensation trends in the industry and general market

Periodically working directly with management on behalf of and under the control and supervision of the Personnel & Compensation Committee

The Personnel & Compensation Committee considered FW Cook’s advice when determining executive compensation plan design and award levels in 2019.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.MANAGEMENT

Delta’s management team provides input to the Personnel & Compensation Committee on Delta’s executive compensation program structure and, under the supervision of the Personnel & Compensation Committee, is responsible for the ongoing administration of the program. This includes:

Developing Flight Plan goals and providing input on business strategy and performance

Providing updates to the Personnel & Compensation Committee on key executive compensation trends in the industry and general market

Evaluating the financial and legal implications of executive compensation proposals and confirming proposed payouts to executive officers under our incentive compensation plans are calculated correctly and comply with plan terms

The Chief Executive Officer making recommendations for the compensation of executive officers other than himself

 25EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     23


Back to Contents

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy is to achieve Delta’s short-term and long-term business goals, which we refer to as our Flight Plan, by closely linking pay to performance and by aligning the interests of all Delta people with the interests of our customers and shareholders. Based on this philosophy, the Personnel & Compensation Committee develops the executive compensation program to promote a pay for performance culture that:

Pay for performance.Performance

Pay for performance is the foundation of our executive compensation philosophy.philosophy for all employees, driving a strong sense of team work and continual improvement of business results. Our executive compensation program places a substantial portion of total compensation for 2015 at risk:risk. In 2019, 94% of ourtotal compensation for the Chief Executive Officer’sOfficer and 90% of ourtotal compensation for the other named executive officers’ total compensation.officers was contingent on Delta achieving ambitious financial, operational and customer service goals or varied with stock price performance. Furthermore, the majority of their total compensation is paid in the form of Delta stock, which, together with our stock ownership and retention guidelines, aligns the interests of management to thosethe interest of stockholders. We believe our stockholders recognize this alignment as shown by the significant approval of our executive compensation program through an advisory vote at our last four annual meetings.shareholders.

2015 Compensation Mix (at target)

LOGO

*Represents At-Risk Compensation

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee sets stretch performance goals under our annual and long-term incentive plans to drive Delta’s business strategy and to deliver value to our stockholders. Consistent with these principles:

The vast majority of the compensation opportunity for our executive officers is earned contingent upon Delta’s achieving its financial, operational and customer service goals and stock price performance.

shareholders. Based on our strong performance in 2015,2019, we paid out 200%185.92% of target under our annual incentive plan and 184.8%144.74% of target under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program.

The P&C Committee designs our2017 long-term incentive program.

Our incentive plans to closely align the interests of management with those of frontline employees by usingin two respects. First, many of the same financial, operational and operationalcustomer service performance measures are used in both our executive and broad-based employee compensation programs. If there is no payout under Delta’s broad-based employee Profit Sharing Program for the year:

There will be no payment under the annual incentive plan’s financial performance measure.

Any payment to executive officers for other performance measures may not exceed the target level.

All payments will be made in restricted stock rather than in cash, which will not vest until there is a subsequent profit sharing payment.

The Profit Sharing Program paid out a record $1.5 billion for 2015.

2015 compensation decisions.    The P&C Committee reviews our executive compensation program annually. In 2015, few changes were made to the program. These changes are described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION26DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Corporate governance and compensation initiatives.    Our executive compensation program reflects corporate governance policies and compensation practices that are transparent, consistent with best practices and aligned with the interests of our stockholders, customers and employees.

The executive compensation practicesSecond, we consider instrumental in driving Company performance while mitigating risk, as well as practices we avoid, are illustrated in the following chart:

Corporate Governance Policies and Other Practices:Compensation ProgramsNot Offered

•     Compensation clawback policy applicable to all officers

•     Stock ownership and retention guidelines for executive officers and directors

•     Equity award grant policy that establishes objective, standardized criteria for the timing of the grant of equity awards

•     “Double trigger” vesting of incentive awards upon a change in control

•     Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy

•     Equity compensation policy that prohibits repricing or cash buyouts of stock options and stock appreciation rights and requires a one-year minimum vesting period for performance-based awards

•     Full disclosure of incentive plan performance measures

•     Engagement with institutional investors regarding our executive compensation program

•     Excise tax reimbursement for payments made in connection with a change in control

•     Loss on sale on residence relocation protection for named executive officers

•     Employment contracts

•     Supplemental executive retirement or deferred compensation plans

•     No company-provided:

¡         company cars

¡        personal club memberships

¡        private jet travel for personal use

¡        executive life insurance (eliminated in July 2015)

¡        financial planning (eliminated in 2016)

¡        home security protection (eliminated in 2016)

To further align our executive compensation program with best practices, in February 2015, the P&C Committee amended the Delta Air Lines 2007 Performance Compensation Plan to prohibit share recycling with respect to stock options and stock appreciation rights.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy and objectives are directly related to our business strategy. In 2015, our primary business goals included maintaining top-tier financial and operational performance; reducing our non-fuel costs; controlling our fuel expense; increasing profitable revenue; and earning and maintaining customer loyalty.

To achieve these goals, the P&C Committee continued the executive compensation philosophy and objectives from the previous year, concluding this approach remained important to deliver value to stockholders, customers and employees. Our principal objectives are to promote a pay for performance culture which:

Places a substantial majority of total compensation at risk and utilizes stretch performance measures that provide incentives to deliver value to our stockholders. As discussed below, the payout opportunities for executive officers underhave long structured both our annual and long-term incentive plans depend on Delta’s financial, operational and customer service performance as well asto ensure that executives do not receive their full incentive payouts unless our people also receive payment under the price of our common stock.Profit Sharing Program for the year.

 

Closely aligns the interests of management with frontline employees by using many of the same performance measures in both our executive and broad-based compensation programs. Consistent with this objective, the goals that drive payouts to frontline employees under our broad-based Profit Sharing and Shared Rewards Programs are some of the metrics included in our annual incentive plan.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.27EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Provides compensation opportunities that assist in motivating and retaining existing talent and attracting new talent to Delta when needed.

Say on Pay Voting Results

At our 20152019 annual meeting, we asked stockholdersshareholders for a non-binding “say on pay” advisory vote to approve the 20142018 compensation of ourthe named executive officers as disclosed in the prior year’s proxy statement, which we referred to as a “say on pay” advisory vote.

officers. Similar to previous years, the holders of approximately 98%over 95% of the shares representedpresent and entitled to vote at the 20152019 annual meeting voted for approval of the compensation of ourthe named executive officers. We believe our stockholders continue to confirm our executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs. The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee took these results into account by continuing to emphasize our pay for performance philosophy by utilizing stretchchallenging performance measures that provide incentives to deliver value to our stockholders.

Administration of the Executive Compensation Program

The following table summarizes the roles and responsibilities of the key participants related to the executive compensation program.shareholders.

 

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     24


Back to Contents

Corporate Governance and Compensation Practices

Our executive compensation program reflects corporate governance policies and compensation practices that are transparent and consistent with best practices. The following chart highlights the policies and practices we consider instrumental in driving company performance while mitigating risk, as well as the practices we avoid:

What We Do:

Key ParticipantsRole and Responsibilities

Subject officers’ incentive compensation to compensation clawback provisions

P&C Committee

The P&C Committee overseesApply stock ownership and retention guidelines to executive officers and directors

Follow objective, standardized criteria for the developmenttiming of reviewsequity award grants

Include “double trigger” change in control provisions in our incentive awards

Prohibit hedging and approves the executivepledging by our employees

Require a one-year minimum vesting period for performance-based awards under our equity compensation program. In this role, the P&C Committee:plan

Fully disclose our incentive plan performance measures

•     Approves Delta’s executive compensation philosophy and objectives

•     Ensures that Delta’s executive compensation program is designed to link payEngage with Company performance

•     Approves the peer group used to assess theinstitutional investors regarding our executive compensation program

What We Don’t Do:

•     Determines the designNo employment contracts

No excise tax reimbursement for payments made in connection with a change in control

No repricing, cash buyouts or share recycling of stock options and terms of the annual and long-term incentivestock appreciation rights under our equity compensation plan

No loss on sale for residence relocation protection for named executive officers

No supplemental executive retirement or deferred compensation plans

No company-provided:

•     Establishes the compensation of the CEO and other personal club memberships

executive officerslife insurance

home security

•     Performs an annual evaluation of the CEO

•     Reviews and advises the Board of Directors regarding management successionfinancial planning

•     Operates under a written charter that requires the P&C Committee to consist of three or more directors. Each member must:

•     be “independent” under NYSE listing standards and Delta’s independence standards

•     qualify as a “non-employee” director under SEC rules

•     be an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

•     Retains, terminates and approves the fees of an executive compensation consultant and conducts independence assessments of all executive compensation advisors

•     Meets regularly in executive session without management


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 28DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Comparative Market Data and Peer Group

We believe peer group data should be used as a point of reference, not as the sole factor in our executive officers’ compensation. In general, the Personnel & Compensation Committee’s objective is for target total direct compensation opportunities to be competitive with the peer group, with individual variation based on the individual’s performance, experience and role within Delta.

Our peer group is composed of three major U.S. airlines and eighteen other companies in the hotel/leisure, transportation/ distribution, machinery/aerospace/defense and retail industries. We selected these industries because we believe it is important that our peer group have business characteristics that are similar to Delta’s, including revenue size, market capitalization, number of employees, operating margin and global presence. In order to retain and attract the talent we need, Delta must compete with these types of companies, and if the peer group was limited to the airline industry, we would have to include companies that are a fraction of the size and scope of Delta. The Personnel & Compensation Committee, in consultation with the compensation consultant and company management, reviews and considers changes to the composition of our peer group annually. There were no changes to the peer group in 2019. The companies in our peer group are:

Key ParticipantsRole and Responsibilities

Compensation Consultant

In 2015, after considering the six factors provided under the NYSE listing standards and Item 407(e)(3)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, the P&C Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its executive compensation consultant for the third consecutive year. In this role, Meridian:

•      Provides advice regarding:

•      Delta’s executive compensation strategy and programs

•      the compensation of the CEO and other executive officers

•      the selection of the peer group used to assess the executive compensation program

•      general compensation program design

•      the impact of regulatory, tax, and legislative changes on Delta’s executive compensation program

•      executive compensation trends and best practices

•      the compensation practices of competitors

•      Conducts risk assessments with respect to the executive compensation program

•      Meets regularly with the P&C Committee in executive session without management

•      Provides no other services to Delta

•      May work directly with management on behalf of the P&C Committee but this work is always under the control and supervision of the P&C Committee

The P&C Committee considered Meridian’s advice when determining executive compensation plan design and award levels in 2015.

 

ManagementAirlines:

American Airlines Group Inc.

Southwest Airlines Co.

United Continental Holdings, Inc.

Hotel/Leisure:

Carnival Corporation

Marriott International, Inc.

Transportation/

Distribution:

The Coca-Cola Company

FedEx Corporation

Norfolk Southern Corporation

PepsiCo, Inc.

Sysco Corporation

Union Pacific Corporation

United Parcel Service, Inc.

Machinery/

Aerospace/Defense:

The Boeing Company

Honeywell International Inc.

L3 Technologies

Textron Inc.

United Technologies Corporation

Retail:

Best Buy Co., Inc.

The Home Depot, Inc.

Lowe’s Corporation

Target Corporation

 

Under  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     25


Back to Contents

Peer Group

Revenue ($)(1)

Market Capitalization ($)(2)

International Operations as

Percentage of Revenue (%)(3)

75th Percentile

77,350

126,817

41

Median

44,514

57,794

29

25th Percentile

22,248

32,861

10

DELTA AIR LINES

47,007

37,681

29

Source: Standard & Poors Capital IQ

(1)

Last 12 months from most recent quarter ended on or before December 31, 2019. In millions.

(2)

As of December 31, 2019. In millions.

(3)

As of the most recent fiscal year-end.

2019 Compensation Decisions

The following changes, which are discussed further below, were made to our executive compensation program in 2019:

As part of our annual executive compensation review, in February 2019, the Personnel & Compensation Committee approved:

An increase to Mr. Bastian’s base salary. Even with this increase, the base salaries for Mr. Bastian and our other executive officers remain positioned well below the market median; and

Increases to the target award opportunities under the long-term incentive program for Mr. Bastian, Mr. Hauenstein and Mr. West to reward their continued leadership in achieving the Company’s outstanding financial and operational performance.

In December 2019, the Personnel & Compensation Committee granted Mr. Carter a restricted stock award to recognize his achievements during the year.

The Personnel & Compensation Committee approved changes to the 2019 annual incentive plan to calculate achievement based on an annual earned salary amount, consistent with the approach used to calculate payouts under the Profit Sharing Program for frontline employees.

InrecognitionoftheunprecedentedchallengesfacingDeltain2020asaresultoftheCOVID-19pandemic,Mr.Bastianis forgoing 100%ofhisbasesalaryforsixmonthsbeginningApril1,2020.Inaddition,theothernamedexecutiveofficersareforgoing50%oftheirbasesalariesforthesameperiod.

Elements of Compensation

Compensation elements for our executive officers include:

Type

Component

Objective

FixedCompensation

Base Salary

Provides a fixed amount of compensation for performing day-to-day functions based on level of responsibility, experience and individual performance

Performance-BasedCompensation

Annual Incentive Plan

Rewards short-term financial and operational performance on a relative and absolute basis using pre-established performance criteria that support the supervisionFlight Plan

Long-Term Incentive Program

Motivates management employees by linking incentives to our multi-year financial and customer service-related goals and rewarding long-term value creation measured by our stock price and return on capital

Aligns with interests of the P&C Committee, Delta’s human resources department is responsible for the ongoing administration of theshareholders, facilitates executive compensation program.

•      The Executive Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officerofficer stock ownership and her staff serve the P&C Committee and, in cooperation with the compensation consultant, prepare proposed compensation programs and policies for review by the P&C Committee at the request of the P&C Committee and the CEO

The following individuals also are involved in the administrationencourages retention of our executive compensation program:management employees

Benefits

•      The CEO makes recommendations to the P&C Committee regarding the compensation of executive officers other than himself

•      The Chief Financial OfficerHealth, Welfare and his staff evaluate the financial implications of executive compensation proposalsRetirement Benefit Plans

Helps attract and financial performance measures in incentive compensation arrangementsretain highly qualified executives

•      The Chief Legal Officer and his staff evaluate the legal implications of executive compensation proposals and prepare plan and program documents

•      The Vice President — Corporate Audit and Enterprise Risk Management confirms the proposed payouts to executive officers under our annual and long-term incentive plans are calculated correctly and comply with the terms of the applicable performance-based plan

Delta does not have a specific compensation target for each element of compensation. As shown in the compensation mix charts on page 24, at-risk compensation is the largest portion of the total compensation opportunity for the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers. The Personnel & Compensation Committee believes this is the appropriate approach for aligning the interests of the named executive officers and shareholders.

 

ir.delta.com
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.29EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     26


Back to ContentsCompensation Decision Factors

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee considers a number of factors, including competitive market data, internal equity, role and responsibilities, business and industry conditions, management succession planning and individual experience and performance in determining executive compensation. When making specific compensation decisions, the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee also reviews compensation “tally sheets” prepared by the compensation consultant. The tally sheets detail the total compensation and benefits for each executive officer, including the compensation and benefits the officer would receive under hypothetical termination of employment scenarios.

PERFORMANCE MEASURE SELECTIONComparative Market Data; Peer Group

Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, the Personnel & Compensation Committee selects performance measures to support our Flight Plan and to closely align the interests of the named executive officers with the interests of our key stakeholders. Recognizing that the performance measures used under our annual and long-term incentive plans may need to change over time to reflect evolving priorities, the Personnel & Compensation Committee, together with company management and the compensation consultant, evaluates the performance measures used in our incentive plans each year to ensure they remain consistent with Delta’s long-term strategic plan and our annual Flight Plan goals.

To achieve our mission that no one better connects the world, the Company’s 2019 Flight Plan focused on four core pillars: our people, our customers, our partners and communities and our owners. With Delta’s culture as the foundation, our 2019 Flight Plan goals included being the airline of choice for customers, running the industry’s best operation, expanding Delta’s global reach, delivering industry-leading financial results and investing for the future. The mix of absolute and relative performance measures included in our 2019 annual and long-term incentive plans are distinct and demonstrate how the Personnel & Compensation Committee incorporates the elements of our Flight Plan to drive performance.

We made changes to our annual and long-term incentive performance measures in 2017 to support a focus on positive revenue growth and global alliances. Given the positive momentum in these areas over the last two years and their continued focus for future years, the Personnel & Compensation Committee determined not to make any further changes to the performance measures for 2019.

In 2011,setting the P&Cannual and long-term performance goals for each performance measure, the Personnel & Compensation Committee modifiedreviews our business plans and considers other factors, including our past variance to targeted performance, our historical performance, economic and industry conditions and the peer group it uses for executive compensation purposesperformance of other airlines. In certain cases, this analysis may cause the Committee to reflect Delta’s increased size, complexity, global presence and business. This custom peer group consists of three major U.S. airlines and eighteen other companies with revenue and other business characteristics similar to Deltaset lower targets than in the hotel/leisure, transportation/distribution, machinery/aerospace/defense, and retail industries. The industries selected have aspects of operationsprevious years. We set challenging, but achievable goals, including those that are similar to Delta. In expandingrealizable only as a result of exceptional performance, for the peer group beyond the airline industry, the P&C Committee had considered the ongoing merger activity in the industry and recognized that the number of comparably-sized airlines is too small to provide stable and reliable market data for executive compensation purposes. In addition, Delta competes for management talent with companies both inside and outside the airline industry,company and the other major airlines use broader industry peer groupsnamed executive officers to assess their executive compensation programs. The P&C Committee continued to be satisfied withdrive the compositionachievement of the custom peer groupour short- and made no changes to it in 2015.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION30DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


The companies in the custom peer group are:

Company Name  Revenue(1)
($)
   Market Capitalization(2)
($)
   International
Operations as
Percentage of
Revenue(3)
(%)
 

Airlines

  

American Airlines Group Inc.

   40,990     26,694     33  

Southwest Airlines Co.

   19,648     28,004     1  

United Continental Holdings, Inc.

   37,864     21,362     43  

Hotel/Leisure

  

Carnival Corporation

   15,714     32,149     49  

Marriott International, Inc.

   14,339     17,218     16  

Transportation/Distribution

               

The Coca-Cola Company

   44,294     186,832     57  

FedEx Corporation

   48,562     41,064     28  

Norfolk Southern Corporation

   10,511     25,256     N/A  

PepsiCo, Inc.

   64,419     145,569     49  

Sysco Corporation

   48,865     23,145     11  

Union Pacific Corporation

   21,813     66,792     10  

United Parcel Service, Inc.

   58,363     66,990     25  

Machinery/Aerospace/Defense

  

The Boeing Company

   96,114     96,873     58  

Honeywell International Inc.

   38,581     79,820     41  

L-3 Communications Corporation

   11,194     9,368     24  

Textron Inc.

   13,423     11,497     37  

United Technologies Corporation

   56,098     85,216     42  

Retail

  

Best Buy Co., Inc.

   40,114     10,436     11  

The Home Depot, Inc.

   86,701     167,677     10  

Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

   58,379     69,585     N/A  

Target Corporation

   73,910     44,732     N/A  
          

75th Percentile

   58,363     79,820     42  

Median

   40,990     41,064     30  

25th Percentile

   19,648     23,145     13  
          

Delta Air Lines

   40,704     39,866     31  

Source: Standard & Poors Research Insight®long-term objectives.

 

 (1)

Last 12 months from most recent quarter ended on or before December 31, 2015. In millions.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     27


Back to Contents

Annual Incentive Plan

(2)

2019 Flight Plan Objectives

As of December 31, 2015. In millions.Performance Measure

(3)

As of the most recent fiscal year end. N/A indicates either data was not available or no significant foreign revenues were reported.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.31EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


We believe peer group data should be used as a point of reference, not as the sole factor in our executive officers’ compensation. In general, the P&C Committee’s objective is to bring target total direct compensation opportunities to be competitive with the custom peer group, with individual variation based on the individual’s role within Delta, performance and experience. Delta does not have a specific compensation target for each element of compensation, but historically has emphasized long-term incentive opportunities over base salaries, which are a fixed cost.

When compared to these businesses, Delta’s total compensation opportunities in 2015 for the named executive officers group in aggregate are competitive with our custom peer group, and take into consideration the executives’ tenure, criticality of their roles to Delta’s success, company performance, succession planning and retention. As stated above, the P&C Committee uses this data as a point of reference, not as the determining factor in setting compensation.

Elements of Compensation

Compensation elements for our executive officers include:

ComponentObjectiveCharacteristics

         Base Salary

•   Provides a fixed amount of cash compensation for performing day-to-day functions based on level of responsibility, experience and individual performance

•   Most companies target base salary at market median; however, the base salaries of our executive officers are below the median of base salaries of those in our peer group

•   There is no set schedule for base salary increases. Base salary increases are periodically provided based on competitive concerns or in connection with an increase in responsibilitiesDescription

         Annual Incentive PlanDeliver Industry-Leading
Financial Results

***

Our Culture is the Foundation

•   Rewards short-term financial, operational and revenue performanceAbsolute Financial — Pre-Tax Income

 

•   Aligns withBased on business plan targets approved each year by the broad-basedBoard of Directors as part of Delta’s annual operating plan

Also serves as the measure used under the Profit Sharing and Shared Rewards Programs in whichProgram, thereby aligning the interests of Delta management with our employees participatepeople

•   Annual incentive awards for our executive officers are based on objective, pre-established performance criteria that aligns with corporate business strategy

•   Award targets are set as a percentage of base salaries

•   Award payment amounts will be limited if no profit sharing is paid to Delta employees; plus any amounts payable to executive officers will be paid in restricted stock (rather than in cash) with restrictions that do not lapse until a profit sharing payment is made (with certain exceptions)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION32DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


         Long-Term Incentive PlanRun the Industry’s Best
Operation

***

Our Culture is the Foundation

***

Be the Airline of Choice for Customers

•    Rewards long-term Company performance based on internal performance goalsOperational Performance —

Delta and those relative to airline peers

•    Aligns with interests of stockholders

•    Facilitates executive officer stock ownership

•    Encourages retention of our management employeesDelta Connection

•    ExceptBased on the broad-based Shared Rewards Program’s on-time arrival, baggage handling, flight completion and net promoter score goals, as well as on-time arrival and flight completion goals for the CEO and President, awardsour Delta Connection carriers

Satisfaction of these measures are provided through equal portions of performance awards and restricted stock

•    Performance awards are earneddetermined based on achievement of objective, pre-establishedeither internal goals or first place performance measures, including average annual operatingrelative to airline peers (other than net promoter scores)

Deliver Industry-Leading
Financial Results

***

Expand Delta’s Global Reach

Relative Financial — Annual
Pre-Tax Income Margin

Compares our pre-tax income margin customer service and return on invested capital over a three-year performance period payablerelative to executive officersour airline peers. The Personnel & Compensation Committee has determined that using pre-tax margin better evaluates the results of our equity investments in stockglobal airlines

 

Long-Term Incentive Program

•    Restricted stock is subject to a three-year vesting period2019 Flight Plan Objectives

Performance Measure

•    In addition to performance awards and restricted stock, awards to the CEO and President also include performance stock options which vest over a three-year period upon the achievement of performance measures linked to employees receiving a payout under the Profit Sharing Program

Description

         BenefitsDeliver Industry-Leading
Financial Results

Total Revenue per Available Seat Mile (TRASM)

A unit revenue measure that includes revenue from our ancillary businesses and other revenue sources as well as passenger revenue

Encourages focus on developing distinctive approaches to achieving top-line revenue growth while emphasizing disciplined capacity growth and revenue management

Be the Airline of Choice for Customers

•    AttractsCustomer Service Performance

Based on Delta’s domestic and retains highly qualified executives with competitive benefit plansinternational net promoter scores, this measure further emphasizes the importance of earning and maintaining customer preference and loyalty

Invest for the Future

Return on Invested Capital

Determined on an after-tax basis and calculated using gross (rather than net) debt, which discourages the holding of excess cash

Deliver Industry-Leading
Financial Results

•    Participation in health, welfare and retirement benefit plans on the same terms asRelative Total Shareholder

Return

Compares our long-term total shareholder return relative to all Delta employees, except basic life insurance, which coverage was eliminated for all officers in July 2015other S&P 500 member companies

•    No company-provided company cars, personal club memberships, private jet travel for personal use, executive life insurance (eliminated in July 2015), financial planning (eliminated in 2016) or home security protection (eliminated in 2016)

As shown previously in the compensation mix charts on page 26, at-risk compensation is the largest portion of the total compensation opportunity for the CEO and the other named executive officers.

BASE SALARY

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee believes this isreviews the appropriate approach for aligning the interests of our named executive officers and stockholders.

Base Salary. The base salaries of our executive officers remain below the median of similarly-situated executives at companies in our custom peer group as described above. In recognition of this and the accomplishments of our executive officers, the P&Cannually. There is no set schedule for base salary increases. The Personnel & Compensation Committee approved a base salary increase for Mr. Bastian effective February 1, 2019, to $950,000. This change was based on the CEO’s recommendations for executive officers other than himselfindividual performance, internal parity considerations and input from the compensation consultant, approved increased base salaries for executive officers, effective February 2015, as follows: Mr. Hauenstein — $565,000; Mr. Jacobson — $525,000; and Mr. West — $540,000.a competitive market review. Even with these increases,this increase, the base salaries of our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers remain below the median of the custom peer group.group for their respective positions.

In recognition of the unprecedented challenges facing Delta in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mr. Bastian is forgoing 100% of his base salary for six months beginning April 1, 2020. In addition, the other named executive officers are forgoing 50% of their base salaries for the same period.

 

ir.delta.com
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.33EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     28


Annual Incentives.Back to Contents

ANNUAL INCENTIVE

The 20152019 Management Incentive Plan (the “2015 MIP”)(2019 MIP) links pay and performance by providing approximately 2,600 management employees with a compensation opportunity based on Delta’s achieving key business planachievement of certain Flight Plan goals in 2015 (which includes the same goals for the CEO, executive officers and substantially all management employees). It2019. The 2019 MIP also aligns the interests of Delta management and employees becauseby using metrics that are consistent with the goals that drive payouts under Delta’s broad-based Profit Sharing and Shared Rewards ProgramsPrograms.

Typically, payments under the 2019 MIP are some of the metrics includedprovided in the 2015 MIP.

The 2015 MIP annual incentive opportunity forcash, however, to provide further alignment between our executive officers is based on Delta’s performance in the following areas, which remain unchanged from 2014 and these measures are different than the long-term incentive program measures described on page 37:

Performance
Category
WeightingPerformance MeasurePerformance Measure
Objectives
Characteristics

Financial

50% 

•    Delta’s 2015 pre-tax income* based on 2015 business plan targets approved by the Board of Directors as part of the Annual Operating Plan

•    Measures Delta’s profitability

•    Aligns executive incentives with Profit Sharing Program

•    Same measure used in the Profit Sharing Program for Delta employees

•    No payment may be made for this performance metric unless there is a payout for 2015 under the Profit Sharing Program

Operational

25% 

•    Number of monthly goals met under Shared Rewards Program (75% weighting)

•    Number of monthly goals met by Delta Connection Carriers (25% weighting)

•    Supports strategic focus on operational performance and therefore customer experience

•    Aligns executive incentives with Shared Rewards Program

•    Same measure used in the Shared Rewards Program for Delta employees

•    Measures operational performance against internal goals and DOT rankings among other airlines

Revenue

25% 

•    Achievement of Total Revenue per Available Seat Mile (“TRASM”) goals year-over-year relative to an Industry Group† average TRASM for the same period

•    Supports strategic focus on profitable growth in revenue

•    Reflects capacity discipline and successful implementation of 2015 revenue growth initiatives, including growth of Delta’s ancillary businesses

•    Payment of this revenue performance measure will not be less than target level if the financial performance measure equals or exceeds the maximum level

*“Pre-tax income” as defined in Delta’s broad-based Profit Sharing Program, means Delta’s annual consolidated pre-tax income calculated in accordance with GAAP and as reported in Delta’s SEC filings, but excluding (a) asset write downs related to long-term assets; (b) gains or losses with respect to employee equity securities; (c) gains or losses with respect to extraordinary, one-time or non-recurring events; and (d) expense accrued with respect to the broad-based employee Profit Sharing Program and the 2015 MIP.

For purposes of the 2015 MIP, the Industry Group consists of: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, JetBlue Airlines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION34DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


To ensure that executive officers are aligned with our employees,people, the executive officers’ 20152019 MIP awards are subject to the following conditions if there is no Profit Sharing Program payout to employees for 2015:

the year:

The actual MIP award, if any, iswill be capped at the target award opportunity, even if Delta’s performance for operational and revenue meets orrelative financial goals exceeds the maximumtarget level.

Any awards earned by executive officers under the 2015 MIP arewill be made in restricted stock (“MIP Restricted Stock”).

The MIP Restricted Stockthat will not vest when (1)until there is a payoutpayment under the Profit Sharing Program or (2) the executive officer’sunder certain termination of employment is terminated by Delta without cause, or due to the officer’s death or disability. If the executive officer voluntarily resigns or retires, the MIP Restricted Stock will vest when there is a payout under the Profit Sharing Program, as if the officer’s employment continued. The MIP Restricted Stock will be forfeited if, prior to vesting, the executive officer’s employment is terminated by Delta for cause. Since there was a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2015, the executive officers received their 2015 MIP award in cash.scenarios.

The following chart shows the performance measures for the named executive officers under the 20152019 MIP and the actual performance for each measure in 2015.2019.

(1)

This column reflects the percentage of the target award earned after application of the performance measure weightings.

(2)

“Pre-tax income” as defined in Delta’s broad-based Profit Sharing Program, means Delta’s annual consolidated pre-tax income calculated in accordance with GAAP and as reported in Delta’s SEC filings, but excluding (a) asset write downs related to long-term assets; (b) gains or losses with respect to special, unusual, or nonrecurring items; and (c) expense accrued with respect to any employee profit sharing plan, program or similar arrangement.

(3)

For purposes of the 2019 MIP, the Industry Group consists of Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines.

 

Performance

Measure

 

Performance
Measure
Weighting

 Performance Levels 

2015 Actual
Performance

 

Percentage of

Target
Earned*

 
  

Threshold

(50% of Target
Payout)

 

Target

(100% of Target
Payout)

 

Maximum

(200% of Target
Payout)

  

Financial

 50%            
2015 Pre-tax income  $5,089 million $6,649 million $7,360 million $7,633 million  100%  

Operational

 25%            
Number of monthly goals met under Shared Rewards Program 75% 16 Shared

Rewards goals

achieved

 21 Shared
Rewards goals

achieved

 26 or more

Shared Rewards

goals achieved

 34 Shared

Rewards goals

achieved

  37.5%  
Number of monthly goals met by Delta Connection Carriers 25% 9 Delta

Connection goals

achieved

 14 Delta

Connection goals

achieved

 19 or more Delta

Connection goals

achieved

 24 Delta

Connection goals

achieved

  12.5%  

Revenue

 25%            
Improvement of TRASM year-over-year relative to Industry Group average TRASM for the same period   108.6% 109.1% 109.6% 110.9%  50%  
  

*        This column reflects the percentage of target earned after application of the performance measure weightings.

 Total Percentage

of Target Award

Earned

  200

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.35EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The target award opportunities under the 20152019 MIP, which have not changed since 2016, are expressed as a percentage of theeach participant’s base salary. For this purpose, beginning with the 2019 MIP, a participant’s base salary will be his or her actual base salary earned during the year, rather than the base salary in effect at the end of the calendar year. The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee made this change to better align with how payouts are calculated under our broad-based Profit Sharing Program. The Committee determined the target award opportunities taking into consideration the custom peer group comparison, the CEO’sChief Executive Officer’s recommendations for executive officers other than himself and input from the compensation consultant. The P&C Committee maintained the 2014 target award opportunities (as shown in the table below) for each of the named executive officers. The target cash compensation opportunities (base salary and MIP) for our named executive officers remain generally below the custom peer group median.

Payments under the 2015 MIP could have ranged from zero to 200% of the target award opportunity depending on the performance achieved. The P&C Committee sets performance targets at threshold, target and maximum levels for each performance measure, with (1) no payment for performance below the threshold level and (2) a potential payment of 50% of target for threshold performance, 100% of target for target performance and 200% of target for maximum performance.

Summarized in the table below are the 20152019 MIP awards earned by each named executive officer:

Named Executive

Officer

  Base Salary   Target Award
(as % of base
salary)
  

Target Award

(in dollars)

   Percentage of
Target Award
Earned
  Total 2015
MIP Award
 

 Mr. Anderson

  $800,000     200 $1,600,000     200 $3,200,000   

 Mr. Bastian

  $625,000     175 $1,093,750     200 $2,187,500   

 Mr. Hauenstein

  $565,000     150 $847,500     200 $1,695,000   

 Mr. Jacobson

  $525,000     150 $787,500     200 $1,575,000   

 Mr. West

  $540,000     150 $810,000     200 $1,620,000   

officer. Because Delta was profitable in 2015, there was a $1.5 billion payout under the Profit Sharing Program to approximately 80,000 employees. Accordingly,for 2019, payments earned by our named executive officers under the 20152019 MIP were made in cash.

Long-Term Incentives.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     29


Back to Contents

2015

Named Executive Officer

Base Salary

Target Award

(as % of base salary)

 

Target Award

Percentage of

Target Award Earned

 

Total 2019

MIP Award

Mr. Bastian

$

945,833

200%

$

1,891,667

185.92%

 

$

3,516,987

Mr. Hauenstein

$

700,000

175%

$

1,225,000

185.92%

 

$

2,227,520

Mr. West

$

700,000

175%

$

1,225,000

185.92%

 

$

2,227,520

Mr. Jacobson

$

550,000

150%

$

825,000

185.92%

 

$

1,533,840

Mr. Carter

$

550,000

125%

$

687,500

185.92%

 

$

1,278,200

LONG-TERM INCENTIVES

2019 Long-Term Incentive Program. Beginning with awards made in 2013, the P&C Committee increased the length of the performance and vesting periods of our long-term incentive program from two years to three years to further align the interests of management and stockholders over a longer period.

The 20152019 Long-Term Incentive Program (“2015 LTIP”)(2019 LTIP) links pay and performance by providing approximately 375 management employees with a compensation opportunity that aligns the interest of management and stockholders,shareholders, with a large portion contingent upon Delta’s financial, customer service and stock price performance over a three-year period. The performance measures and goals are the same for the CEO,Chief Executive Officer, the other named executive officers and all other participants in this plan, butprogram.

The 2019 LTIP target awards are different than the performance measures underlargest component of each executive officer’s compensation opportunity. The Personnel & Compensation Committee determined the 2015 MIP.target award opportunities so each participant’s total direct compensation opportunity is competitive with the peer group.

Under the 2015 LTIP, Mr. Anderson and Mr. Bastian received anThe award opportunity consisting of 33 1/3% restricted stock, 33 1/3% performance awards and 33 1/3% performance stock options, and our other executive officers received an award opportunity consisting of 50% performance awards and 50% restricted stock. These allocations shown below were selected to balance the incentive opportunity between Delta’s financial performance relative to other airlines, internal Companycompany performance and its stock price performance. The inclusion of performance-based stock options for the CEO and President was intended to further enhance the alignment of their compensation opportunities with stockholders. This mix and the other terms of the 20152019 LTIP are intended to balance the performance and retention incentives with the high volatility of airline stocks.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION36DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


PerformanceAwards

Performance awards are a dollar-denominated long-term incentive opportunityopportunities payable in commonDelta stock to executive officers and in cash to other participants. The payout, if any, of the performance award is basedchart on the following three measures over the three-year period ending December 31, 2017:

Performance MeasureWeightingMeasurement

 Average Annual Operating Income Margin

50% Delta relative to composite performance of an Industry Group*

 Customer Service Performance (Net Promoter Score) Domestic

15% Delta’s absolute performance

 Customer Service Performance (Net Promoter Score) International

10% Delta’s absolute performance

 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

25% Delta’s absolute performance

*For purposes of the 2015 LTIP, the Industry Group consists of: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, JetBlue Airlines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines.

The P&C Committee retained these performance measures from 2014 because superior rankings in these areas should, over time, produce positive stockholder returns.

The following chartpage shows the range of potential payments of the performance awards based on the 20152019 LTIP’s threefour performance measures. The potential payments may range from zero to 200% ofmeasures over the target award.three-year period ending December 31, 2021. Any payouts under this award will occur in 2022.

    Performance Measures
Performance Level Percentage
of Target
Earned
  Average Annual
Operating Income
Margin
 Customer Service Performance (Net
Promoter Score)
 

Return on Invested

Capital

   Domestic International 

Maximum

  200 20.0% above Composite Performance of
Industry Group
 +4.2 percentage
points or higher
 +7.5 percentage
points or higher
 16.0% or Higher

Target

  100 Composite Performance
of Industry Group
 +2.5 percentage
points
 +3.5 percentage
points
 14.0%

Threshold

  50 20.0% below Composite
Performance of Industry Group*
 +0 percentage
points
 +2.0 percentage
points
 12.0%

 

*ir.delta.comBeginning in 2016, this performance measure must equal at least Composite Performance of Industry Group to achieve the Threshold performance level.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     30


Back to Contents

(1)

For purposes of the 2019 LTIP, the Industry Group consists of: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines.

Restricted stock is common stock that may not be sold or otherwise transferred for a period of time, and is subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances. Stock

The 20152019 LTIP generally provides that restricted stock will vest (which means the shares may then be sold) in three equal installments on February 1, 2016,2020, February 1, 20172021 and February 1, 2018.2022, subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances. Restricted stock is eligible for dividends, but such dividends will not become payable until such time as the restrictions on the underlying stock lapse. The value of a participant’s restricted stock award will depend on the price of Delta common stock when the award vests.

Performance Stock Options

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.37EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


A performance stock option is the right to purchase our common stock at a certain price per share during a designated period, butStock options are inherently performance-based, as they provide realized value only if certainthe stock price appreciates. Nevertheless, the Personnel & Compensation Committee added a performance measures are achieved.hurdle based on employees receiving a payout under the Profit Sharing Program to further align our named executive officers’ interests with the interests of our people. The 20152019 LTIP generally provides that the performance stock options will become exercisable on the vesting dates described in the chart below, subject to the achievement of the following performance measures:

Performance Measure

 

Vesting Dates

Performance MeasureVesting Dates

Employees receive a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 20152019

 1/3 of performance stock option award

February 1, 20162020

 1/3 of performance stock option award

February 1, 20172021

 1/3 of performance stock option award

February 1, 20182022

If there is no Profit Sharing Program payout for 2015,2019, but employees receive a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 20162020

2/3 of performance stock option award

February 1, 20172021

1/3 of performance stock option award

February 1, 20182022

Employees receive no Profit Sharing Program payout for either 20152019 or 20162020

The entire performance stock option award will be forfeited (regardless of whether(even if employees receive a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2017)2021).

These performance stock options have an exercise price of $46.14, which is equal

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     31


Back to the closing price of our common stock on the grant date and will expire on February 4, 2025.Contents

Because employeesour people received a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2015,2019, one-third of Mr. Anderson’s and Mr. Bastian’sthe named executive officers’ performance stock options vested and became exercisable on February 2, 20165, 2020 (the date on which the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee certified the performance measure was satisfied), and the remaining two-thirds will vest in equal installments on each of February 1, 20172021 and February 1, 2018,2022, subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.

The 2015 LTIP target awards are the largest component of each executive officer’s compensation opportunity, reflecting the P&C Committee’s focus on longer-term compensation, Delta’s financial results relative to peer airlines, return on invested capital and customer service performance, as well as on Delta’s common stock price performance. The P&C Committee determined the target award opportunities so the participant’s total direct compensation opportunity is competitive with our custom peer group.

For additional information about the vesting and possible forfeiture of the 20152019 LTIP awards, see “Post Employment Compensation — Other“Post-Employment Compensation—Potential Post-Employment Benefits — The 2015 upon Termination or Change in Control—Long-Term Incentive Program” in this proxy statement.Programs” on page 43.

The 20132017 Long-Term Incentive Program Payouts.

In 2013,2017, the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee granted the named executive officers performance awards under the 20132017 Long-Term Incentive Program (the “2013 LTIP”)(2017 LTIP). DeltaWe reported these award opportunities in itsour 2018 proxy statement for the applicable year.statement.

The performance awards were denominated in cash but paid in shares of commonDelta stock to the named executive officers. The payout of these award opportunities is based on the average annual operating income margintotal revenue per available seat mile (TRASM) relative to the composite performance of an industry peer group, and Delta’s customer service performance, and return on invested capital and total shareholder return relative to all other S&P 500 companies over the three-year performance period endingended December 31, 2015. The potential payout ranged from zero to 200% of the target award.2019.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION38DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Summarized in the chart below are the performance results certified by the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee for the performance awards under the 20132017 LTIP and the resulting percentage of target award opportunity earned:

 

Performance

Measure

 

Performance

Measure

Weighting

 Performance Levels 

Actual
Performance for

Performance

Period ending

December 31, 2015

 

Percentage

of Target

Earned*

  

Threshold

(50% of Target

Payout)

 

Target

(100% of Target

Payout)

 

Maximum

(200% of Target

Payout)

  

Average Annual

Operating

Income Margin

 50% 8.5% 

12.6%

(Composite Performance of Industry
Group)

 16.8% 15.6% 84.8%
Customer Service Performance
(Net Promoter Score)
  
Domestic 15% +0 percentage

points

 

+2 percentage

points

 

+4.5

percentage points or higher

 

+7

percentage points

 30%
International 10% +2 percentage

points

 

+3.5 percentage

points

 

+7

percentage points or higher

 

+13.9

percentage points

 20%

Return on

Invested Capital†

 12.5% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% or higher 15.1% for 2013 16.7%
 12.5% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% or higher 20.8% for 2014 16.7%
  12.5% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% or higher 24.3% for 2015 16.6%
  

*        This column reflects the percentage of target earned after application of the performance measure weightings.

†        Return on Invested Capital performance was measured independently each calendar year during the three-year performance period. (Beginning in 2016, this performance measure will be measured over the entire three-year performance period rather than independently each calendar year.)

 Total Percentage of Target
Award Earned
 184.8%

Benefits.

(1)

This column reflects the percentage of the target award earned after application of the performance measure weightings.

BENEFITS

Our named executive officers participate in the same ongoing retirement plans as our frontline employees, including a defined contribution plan and, for certain officers, a frozen defined benefit pension plan. We do not provide any supplemental executive retirement plans or deferred compensation plans. The named executive officers also receive the same health and welfare benefits

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     32


Back to Contents

provided to all Delta employees, except for basic life insurance coverage, which all other employees receive but was eliminated for alland our officers in July 2015.do not. In addition, Delta requires officers to regularly complete a comprehensive physical examination. Delta pays the cost of this examination, which is limited to a prescribed set of preventive procedures based on the person’s age and gender.examination. Every domestic full-time Delta employee is eligible for a free physical under the company’s health plans. Mr. Anderson is eligible to receive certain medical benefits under a 2001 agreement with his former employer, Northwest Airlines, but Mr. Anderson has voluntarily waived these benefits while employed by Delta. For additional information regarding the 2001 agreement, see “Post-Employment Compensation – Other Benefits – Pre-existing Medical Benefits Agreement with Northwest” in this proxy statement.

In addition to the company-provided basic life insurance coverage, certain other benefits and perquisites were eliminated for all officers during 2015 and 2016. These include company-provided supplemental life insurance coverage, which was eliminated in July 2015, and financial planning and home security protection, which were eliminated in January 2016. The named executive officers continue to be eligiblethan eligibility for flight benefits (for the executive officer, immediate family members and other designees and, in certain circumstances, the executive officer’s surviving spouse or domestic partner).spouse), Delta provides no perquisites to any of our officers. Delta provides certain flight benefits to all employees and eligible retirees and survivors. These benefits are a low-cost, highly valued tool for attracting and retaining talent and are consistent with industry practice. The perquisites received by named executive officers represent a small part of the overall compensation for executives and are offered to provide competitive compensation. See the Summary Compensation Table and the related footnotes on page 36 for information regarding benefits received in 20152019 by the named executive officers.

We do not provide any supplemental executive retirement plans (officers participate in the same on-going retirement plans as our frontline employees), deferred compensation plans, personal club memberships, company cars or private jet travel for personal use for any named executive officer.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.39EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Risk Assessment

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee requested MeridianFW Cook conduct a risk assessment of Delta’s executive compensation program. Based on this review, MeridianFW Cook determined that Delta’sthe executive compensation program does not incentencourage unnecessary risk taking,risk-taking, and the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee and Deltacompany management agree with this assessment. In this regard, the P&CThe Personnel & Compensation Committee notes the executive compensation program includes:

(1) a compensation clawback policy for officers;

(2) stock ownership and retention guidelines for executive officers;

(3) incentive compensation capped at specified levels;

(4) an emphasis on longer-term compensation;

(5) use of multiple performance measures, both annual and long-term; and

(6) an anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy for all employees.

These features are designed to align the interests of executives with preserving and enhancing stockholdershareholder value. The clawback policy, the stock ownership guidelines and anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy are discussed below.

Executive Compensation Policies

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee monitors the continuing dialogue among corporate governance experts, securities regulators and related parties regarding best practices for executive compensation. Over the last few years, the P&C Committee has refined the corporate governance features of theDelta’s executive compensation program to betterpolicies, described below, are consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, align the program with stockholdershareholder interests and incentfoster responsible behavior by adopting a compensation clawback policy for officers, stock ownership guidelines for executive officers, an equity award grant policy and a supplemental equity compensation plan policy to reflect current best practices. Additionally, Delta’s compliance program under the federal securities laws prohibits all employees from engaging in securities hedging and pledging transactions. A brief discussion of these policies follows.behavior.

Clawback PolicyCLAWBACK POLICY

The compensation clawback policy holds officers accountable should anyin the event of them ever engage in wrongful conduct. Under this policy, if the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee determines an officer has engaged in fraud or misconduct that requires a restatement of Delta’s financial statements, the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee may recover all incentive compensation awarded to or earned by the officer for fiscal periods materially affected by the restatement. For these purposes,this purpose, incentive compensation includes annual and long-term incentive awards and all forms of equity compensation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Under Delta’s stock ownership guidelines, strengthen the alignment between executive officers and stockholders. Under these guidelines, which were significantly enhanced in 2013, the current executive officers are required to own the shares of Delta common stock equal or greater to:as shown below:

 

Shares Equal to a

Multiple of Base
Salary

OR

OR    

Shares

CEOChief Executive Officer

8x

8x

400,000

President/Senior Executive Vice President

6x

6x

200,000

Executive Vice Presidents

4x

4x

150,000

In addition, each

Executive officers must achieve the applicable ownership level within five years of the date they become subject to the guidelines. Each executive officer must hold at least 50% of all net shares received through restricted stock vesting or realized through stock option exercises until the applicable stock ownership guidelines applicable to the executive officer areguideline is achieved. For these purposes, net sharesthis purpose, “net shares” means all shares retained after applicable withholding of any shares for tax purposes, and stockpurposes. Stock ownership includes restricted stock; restricted stock units; shares owned directly or by a spouse or dependent children of the executive officer; shares owned in trust by or for the executive officer, the executive officer’s spouse or immediate family member residing in the same household; and shares owned by an entity wholly-owned by the executive officer or immediate family members residing in the same household. It does not include shares an executive officer has the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options. The stock ownership of our executive

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION40DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


officers is measured based on the three-month average of the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE. As of December 31, 2015,2019, all of our named executive officers exceeded their required stock ownership level.

Equity Award Grant PolicyEQUITY AWARD GRANT POLICY 

Delta’s equity award grant policy provides objective, standardized criteria for the timing, practices and procedures used in granting equity awards. Under this policy, the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee will consider approval of annual equity awards for management employees in the first quarter of the calendar year. Once approved, the grant date of these awards will be the later of (1) the date the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee approves the awards and (2) the third business day following the date on which Delta publicly announces its financial results for the most recently completed fiscal year. Equity awards for new hires, promotions or other off-cycle grants may be approved as appropriate and, once approved, these awards will be made on the later of (1) the date on which the grant is approved and (2) the third business day following the date on which Delta publicly announces its quarterly or annual financial results if this date is in the same month as the grant.

Supplemental Equity Compensation Plan Policy. The P&C Committee adopted this policy to supplement the Delta 2007 Performance Compensation Plan (the “Performance Compensation Plan”). The policy reaffirms the prohibition against the repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights under the Performance Compensation Plan without stockholder approval, except in connection with certain corporate events; and clarifies that this repricing prohibition includes cash buyouts. In addition, the policy provides that all performance-based awards granted under the plan must be subject to a one-year minimum vesting period, with certain limited exceptions.ANTI-HEDGING AND ANTI-PLEDGING POLICY

The elements of this policy have been incorporated into the amended and restated Performance Compensation Plan, which plan is being submitted for stockholder approval at the 2016 annual meeting. See “Proposal 3 – Approval of Amendment and Restatement of Performance Compensation Plan” for more information.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy. As part of an update to itsUnder Delta’s insider trading policy, in 2012, Delta expandedemployees and clarified prohibitions related to transactions in short-term or highly leveraged transactions. Under the updated policy, Delta prohibits employeesBoard of Director members are prohibited from engaging in transactions in Delta securities involving publicly traded options, short sales and

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     33


Back to Contents

hedging transactions because they may create the appearance of unlawful insider trading and, in certain circumstances, present a conflict of interest. In addition, Delta expanded its insider trading policy to prohibit employees and Board of Director members are prohibited from holding Delta securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Delta securities as collateral for a loan.

Compensation for Mr. AndersonBastian

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee determinesevaluates Mr. Bastian’s performance and makes compensation decisions based on his delivery of the compensation ofFlight Plan and his progress toward meeting Delta’s long-term business strategies. In 2019, Mr. AndersonBastian led Delta to exceed its operational, customer-service and financial goals, while also advancing the company’s future success by developing our global relationships, upgrading our fleet, making technology a competitive advantage and prioritizing the company’s diversity, inclusion and sustainability efforts.

The Personnel & Compensation Committee recognized Mr. Bastian’s performance by increasing his target award opportunity under the 2019 LTIP to $12.5 million. This change is consistent with the approach usedour pay for our other executive officers. In accordance with our executive compensationperformance philosophy and provides incentive for him to further alignfocus on long-term improvements in company performance that will lead to greater shareholder value. The actual payout Mr. Bastian realizes on his 2019 LTIP award will depend upon achievement of the interests of Mr. Anderson and our stockholders, the vast majority of Mr. Anderson’s compensation opportunity is at risk and dependent on Companyplan’s performance measures and stock price performance.

No change was madeperformance over the three-year performance period ending in 2015 to2021. In addition, after also reviewing market and internal equity factors, the Personnel & Compensation Committee increased Mr. Anderson’sBastian’s base salary annual incentive target or his long-term incentive plan target. As noted in last year’s proxy statement,to $950,000, effective February 1, 2019. With these changes, Mr. Anderson receivedBastian’s total compensation is within the remaining halfmedian range of the one-time Transition Award Program award, consistingpeer group.

In recognition of 50% performance awardsthe unprecedented challenges facing Delta in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mr. Bastian is forgoing100% of his base salary for six months beginning April 1, 2020.

As the following graphs illustrate, a substantial percentage of Mr. Bastian’s compensation is at-risk and 50% restricted stockconcentrated in 2014. Consequently, the compensation displayed in the Summary Compensation Table reflects a decrease of $1.91 million in long-term incentive compensation opportunities from 2014.equity-based awards.

See the Summary Compensation Table and the related footnotes in this proxy statementon page 36 for additional information about Mr. Anderson’sBastian’s compensation. The amounts reported in the columns for Stock Awards include the 2015 LTIP and represent the aggregate fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on the applicable grant date. The amounts do not reflect the risk there will be no payout of the performance awards or, in the case of performance stock options, there is no vesting, because the performance conditions are not met.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.41EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The P&C Committee designed Mr. Anderson’s compensation arrangements to provide incentive for him to focus on long-term improvements in Company performance that will lead to greater stockholder value. For example, the following chart illustrates that a substantial percentage of Mr. Anderson’s total compensation is concentrated in equity-based award opportunities.

LOGO

Taken in total with the other elements of Delta’s executive compensation program, the P&C Committee believes the right balance is struck between annual operating performance and long-term investments in the Company’s operations.

Post-Employment Compensation

Our executive officers do not have employment contracts, supplemental executive retirement plans, deferred compensation plans or change in control agreements. They are eligible to receive certain benefits in the event of specified terminations of employment, including as a consequence of a change in control. The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee believes these provisions strengthen the alignment of the executives’ compensation with future company performance.

The severance benefits and the forfeiture provisions under our long-term incentive plansprograms for ourthe named executive officers are described in “Post-Employment Compensation — Potential Post-Employment Benefits upon Termination or Change in Control” in this proxy statement.on page 42.

Tax and Accounting Impact and Policy

The financial and tax consequences to Delta of the elements of the executive compensation program are important considerations for the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee when analyzing the overall design and mix of compensation. The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee seeks to balance an effective compensation program with an appropriate impact on reported earnings and other financial measures.

In making compensation decisions, the P&C Committee considers that Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits deductions for certain compensation to any covered executive to $1 million per

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     34


Back to Contents

year. Under Section 162(m),Prior to 2018, this limitation did not apply to the chief financial officer or compensation may be excluded fromthat met the $1 million limit if required conditions are met.tax code requirements for qualifying performance-based compensation. Changes in the tax law effective January 1, 2018, expanded the limitation on deductibility to include the chief financial officer and eliminated the performance-based exception (except in the case of certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017). The 2015 MIP andelimination of the performance-based exception has not altered the Personnel & Compensation Committee’s commitment in this area because pay for performance awards under the 2015 LTIP meet the conditions for exclusion. From time to time, in order to ensure competitive levelsis a foundational principle of compensation for our executive officers, the P&C Committee may approve compensation including base salary and benefits that are not deductible under Section 162(m).philosophy.

Equity awards granted under our executive compensation program are expensed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION42DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Compensation Committee Report

The P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with Delta management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on such review and discussion, the P&CPersonnel & Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

THE PERSONNEL & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Daniel A. Carp,ChairmanChair

John
Francis S. Brinzo

Shirley C. Franklin

David R. Goode

Blake
Jeanne P. Jackson
George N. Mattson


Sergio A. L. Rial
David S. Taylor

Kenneth B. WoodrowCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Personnel & Compensation Committee is a former or current officer or employee of Delta or has any interlocking relationships as set forth in applicable SEC rules.

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.43EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     35


Back to ContentsInformation about Summary

Executive Compensation Table and Related MattersTables

The table below contains information about the compensation of the following named executive officers during 2015:2019: (1) Mr. Anderson,Bastian, Delta’s principal executive officer; (2) Mr. Jacobson, Delta’s principal financial officer; and (3) Mr. Bastian,Hauenstein, Mr. HauensteinWest and Mr. West,Carter, who were Delta’s three other most highly compensated executive officers on December 31, 2015.2019.

AsofthepublicationofthisProxyStatement,Delta’sstockpricehasdeclinedsignificantly,alongwiththeairlineindustryasawhole,duetothesudden,precipitousreductioninairlinetravelcausedbytheCOVID-19pandemic.Asrequiredbyapplicableregulations,theamountsshowninthe“StockAwards”and“OptionAwards”columnsbelowfor2019arebasedontheclosingpriceofDeltacommonstockof$50.52onFebruary6,2019,theaward’sgrantdate.AsofApril15,2020,theclosingpriceofDeltacommonstockwas$24.35pershare.Thisstockpricedeclinehasreducedthestatedvalueofthestockandoptionawardsbyalmost52percent.Atthistime,alloutstandingperformancestockoptionsfrom2019andprioryearawardshavezerointrinsicvalue.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
(1)(2)(3)
  Option
Awards
($)(1)(4)
  Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation
($)(5)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(6)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(7)
  Total
($)(8)
 

Richard H. Anderson

  2015    800,000    0    7,667,106    3,833,544    3,200,001    0    341,799    15,842,450  

Chief Executive Officer

  2014    790,625    0    9,576,901    3,833,459    3,090,001    0    298,881    17,589,867  
  2013    725,000    0    8,910,176    2,000,000    2,446,876    0    293,850    14,375,902  

Edward H. Bastian

President

  2015    625,000    0    4,000,169    2,000,195    2,187,500    0    233,710    9,046,574  
  2014    618,750    0    4,000,128    2,000,013    2,112,305    67,075    211,059    9,009,330  
  2013    575,000    0    5,340,193    1,000,000    1,698,047    0    231,966    8,845,206  

Glen W. Hauenstein

  2015    565,000    0    4,750,287    0    1,695,000    0    192,276    7,202,563  

Executive Vice President &

  2014    523,750    0    3,500,227    0    1,520,859    0    166,933    5,711,769  

Chief Revenue Officer

  2013    487,292    0    3,340,264    0    1,139,942    0    156,018    5,123,516  

Paul A. Jacobson

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer

  2015    525,000    0    3,550,006    0    1,575,000    0    177,506    5,827,512  
  2014    496,875    0    2,550,139    0    1,448,438    30,186    139,487    4,665,125  
  2013    467,708    0    2,820,065    0    1,001,953    0    118,781    4,408,507  

W. Gil West (9)

  2015    540,000    0    3,750,130    0    1,620,000    0    162,605    6,072,735  

Executive Vice President &
Chief Operating Officer

  2014    496,875    0    2,550,139    0    1,448,438    0    128,264    4,623,716  

Name

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards

($)(1)(2)(3)

Option

Awards

($)(1)(4)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(5)

Change in Pension

Value and Nonqualified

Deferred Compensation

earnings

($)(6)

All Other

compensation

($)(7)

 

Total

($)(8)

Edward H. Bastian

Chief Executive Officer

2019

945,833

-

8,375,463

4,125,096

3,516,987

33,393

328,606

 

17,325,379

2018

891,667

-

7,705,118

3,795,014

2,277,090

-

313,559

 

14,982,448

2017

800,004

-

6,700,177

3,300,030

2,119,531

32,292

253,669

 

13,205,703

Glen W. Hauenstein

President

2019

700,000

-

4,522,932

2,227,509

2,227,520

-

239,872

 

9,967,833

2018

693,750

-

4,020,040

1,980,072

1,549,686

-

220,252

 

8,463,800

2017

625,000

-

4,020,106

1,980,082

1,448,891

-

153,110

 

8,227,189

W. Gil West

Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

2019

700,000

-

4,522,932

2,227,509

2,227,520

 

208,756

 

9,936,717

2018

693,750

-

4,020,040

1,980,072

1,549,686

-

198,813

 

8,442,361

2017

625,000

-

3,937,615

1,312,597

1,448,891

-

167,087

 

7,491,190

Paul A. Jacobson

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

2019

550,000

-

3,000,236

1,000,033

1,533,840

29,327

169,716

 

6,283,152

2018

547,917

-

3,000,035

1,000,048

1,043,666

-

158,317

 

5,749,983

2017

525,000

-

3,000,393

1,000,028

1,043,201

17,223

153,712

 

5,739,557

Peter W. Carter

Executive Vice President & Chief Legal Officer

2019

550,000

-

2,350,193

700,056

1,278,200

-

159,010

 

5,037,459

2018

545,833

-

1,912,657

637,529

869,722

-

151,433

 

4,117,174

2017

500,000

-

1,912,683

637,602

827,938

-

139,990

 

4,018,213

(1) 

The amounts in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns do not represent amounts the named executive officers received or are entitled to receive. Rather, the reported amounts represent the aggregate fair value of awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation (FASB ASC Topic 718), on the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. The reported amounts do not reflect the risk the stock awards may be forfeited in certain circumstances; for awards subject to performance conditions, the risk there is no payout; or in the case of performance stock options, that there is no vesting because the performance conditions are not met. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the closing price of Delta common stock on the grant date.

 

The reported amounts for 2019, 2018 and 2017 in the “Stock Awards” column reflect award opportunities under Delta’s long-term incentive programs. For additional information, see footnotes 2 and 3 below.

(2) 

The 2019 Long-Term Incentive Program (2019 LTIP) provides our executive officers with a long-term incentive opportunity consisting of performance awards, performance stock options and restricted stock. The performance awards under the 2019 LTIP are denominated in dollars. The payouts, if any, earned by a named executive officer will be made in stock based on the achievement of pre-established performance measures over a three-year performance period. The restricted stock granted under the 2019 LTIP vests in equal installments on February 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022, subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentives” on page 30 for details about the 2019 LTIP.

 

The reported amounts for 2019 in the “Stock Awards” column include the fair value of the performance awards and restricted stock under the 2019 LTIP, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on February 6, 2019, the date the 2019 LTIP awards became effective and, in addition for Mr. Carter, the fair value of a restricted stock award, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on December 4, 2019, the date such award became effective.

 

See footnote 4 below for additional information regarding the performance stock options.

 

(1)ir.delta.comThe amounts in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns do not represent amounts the named executive officers received or are entitled to receive. Rather, the reported amounts represent the aggregate fair value of awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), on the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. The reported amounts do not reflect the risk the stock awards may be forfeited in certain circumstances; for awards subject to performance conditions, the risk there is no payout; or in the case of performance stock options, that there is no vesting because the performance conditions are not met. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the closing price of Delta common stock on the grant date.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     36


The reported amounts for 2015, 2014 and 2013 in the “Stock Awards” column reflect award opportunities under Delta’s long-term incentive plans. Because Mr. Anderson only received fifty percent of his One Time Transition Award Program (“One Time TAP”) award value in 2013, $1.9 million of the reported amounts for the 2014 LTIP in the “Stock Awards” column include the remaining value of his One Time TAP award. For additional information, see footnotes 2 and 3 below.Back to Contents

(2)The 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program (“2015 LTIP”) links pay and performance and aligns the interests of Delta management and stockholders. As discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation,” the long-term incentive opportunity for executive officers under these programs consists of performance awards and restricted stock, and with respect to Mr. Anderson and Mr. Bastian, performance stock options.
(3) 

The performance awards under the 2015 LTIP are denominated in dollars. The payouts, if any, earned by a named executive officer will be made in stock based on Delta’s average annual operating income margin relative to other airlines, on Delta’s return on invested capital and Delta’s customer service performance based on the percentage point improvement in Delta’s net promoter scores.

The restricted stock granted under the 2015 LTIP vests in equal installments on February 1, 2016, 2017 and 2018. All restricted stock is subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION44DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


The reported amounts for 2015 in the “Stock Awards” column include the fair value of the performance awards and restricted stock under the 2015 LTIP, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on February 5, 2015, the date the 2015 LTIP awards became effective.

See footnote 4 below for additional information regarding the performance stock options.

(3)For awards in the “Stock Awards” column that are subject to performance conditions, the fair value is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. For these purposes, the fair value of the performance awards under the 20152019 LTIP is computed based on performance at the target level.

If the performance awards were assumed to pay out at the maximum level, the aggregate fair value of such awards, which does not include the restricted stock or performance stock option component of the 2019 LTIP, for the named executive officers would be as follows:

If the performance awards were assumed to pay out at the maximum level, the aggregate fair value of such awards, which does not include the restricted stock component of the 2015 LTIP, for the named executive officers would be as follows:

Name  2015($)   2014($)   2013($) 

Richard H. Anderson

   7,666,666     9,576,666     8,910,000  

Edward H. Bastian

   4,000,000     4,000,000     5,340,000  

Glen W. Hauenstein

   4,750,000     3,500,000     3,340,000  

Paul A. Jacobson

   3,550,000     2,550,000     2,820,000  

W. Gil West

   3,750,000     2,550,000       

Name

2019 ($)

2018 ($)

2017 ($)

Edward H. Bastian

8,500,000

7,820,000

6,800,000

Glen W. Hauenstein

4,590,000

4,080,000

4,080,000

W. Gil West

4,590,000

4,080,000

3,990,000

Paul A. Jacobson

3,040,000

3,040,000

3,040,000

Peter W. Carter

2,128,000

1,938,000

1,938,000

 

(4)

The stock options granted to Mr. Anderson and Mr. Bastian under the 20152019 LTIP are subject to performance conditions. Because the conditions for vesting have been met, the stock options vest in equal installments on each of February 2, 20165, 2020, February 1, 2021 and February 1, 2017 and 2018.2022 We determined the grant date fair value of stock options based on achievement of the target level under an option pricing model using the following assumptions: (1) a 1.46%1.47% risk-free interest rate, (2) a 53%27% expected volatility of common stock and (3) a six5.2 year expected life.

(5) 

(5)The 20152019 Management Incentive Plan (“2015 MIP”) is(MIP) provides our executive officers with an annual incentive plan that links pay andopportunity based on the achievement of pre-established performance and aligns the interest of Delta management and employees. As discussed inmeasures. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Annual Incentive” on page 29 for details about the annual incentive opportunity2019 MIP, including a description of Delta’s 2019 MIP performance.

(6) 

The reported amounts for executive officers2019 reflect the aggregate change in the actuarial present value for Mr. Bastian’s and Mr. Jacobson’s accumulated benefits under the 2015 MIP is basedfrozen Delta Retirement Plan measured from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Mr. Hauenstein, Mr. West and Mr. Carter are not participants in this plan. See “Post-Employment Compensation — Defined Benefit Pension Benefits” on Delta’s financial, operational and revenue performance relative to key businesspage 41 for a description of this plan, goals.

including its eligibility requirements.

(7) 

Payments, if any, earned by the named executive officers under the 2015 MIP are made (a) in cash if there is a payout under Delta’s broad-based employee profit sharing program (“Profit Sharing Program”) for 2015 and (b) in restricted stock if there is no such payout (“MIP Restricted Stock”).

Because Delta was profitable in 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were payouts to Delta employees under the Profit Sharing Program in each of those years. Accordingly, payments earned by executive officers under the 2015 MIP, 2014 MIP and 2013 MIP were made in cash. These cash payments are reported for 2015, 2014 and 2013 in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Annual Incentives” for details on Delta’s 2015 MIP performance.

(6)Delta does not sponsor a supplemental executive retirement plan for any named executive officer.

The Delta Retirement Plan is a broad-based, non-contributory tax qualified defined benefit pension plan for nonpilot employees. Effective December 31, 2005, the Delta Retirement Plan was amended to freeze service, earnings and pay credits for all participants, including any participating named executive officers. See “Post-Employment Compensation — Defined Benefit Pension Benefits” for a description of this plan.

The reported amounts for 2015 reflect the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each applicable named executive officer’s accumulated benefit under the Delta Retirement Plan measured from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015. For the period from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015, the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefits decreased during this period by $7,211 for Mr. Bastian and $8,191 for Mr. Jacobson. This decrease is the result of an increase in the discount rate assumption in calculating these values.

Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hauenstein and Mr. West are not eligible to participate in the Delta Retirement Plan because they either were not employed with Delta or had not completed 12 months of service when the plan was frozen on December 31, 2005.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.45EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(7)The reported amounts of all other compensation for 20152019 include the following items:

Name

  Contributions
to  Qualified
Defined
Contribution
Retirement
Plan
($)(a)
   Payments due to
Internal  Revenue
Code Limits
Applicable to
Qualified Defined
Contribution Plan
($)(b)
   Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)(c)
   Reimbursement
of Taxes
($)(d)
   Perquisites
and  Other
Personal
Benefits
($)(e)
 

Richard H. Anderson

   18,550     253,750     1,249     37,775     30,475  

Edward H. Bastian

   18,550     173,061     976     23,299     17,824  

Glen W. Hauenstein

   18,550     127,460     851     18,056     27,359  

Paul A. Jacobson

   18,550     119,591     800     16,541     22,024  

W. Gil West

   18,550     120,641     812     11,746     10,856  

Name

Contributions to

Qualified Defined

Contribution Plan

($)(a)

Payment due to IRS

limits to Qualified

Plan

($)(b)

 

Reimbursement of

Taxes

($)(c)

 

Perquisites and

Other Benefits

($)(d)

Edward H. Bastian

25,200

264,863

20,698

17,844

Glen W. Hauenstein

25,200

177,272

19,839

17,561

W. Gil West

25,200

177,272

6,284

0

Paul A. Jacobson

25,200

118,230

15,192

11,094

Peter W. Carter

25,200

102,575

17,251

13,984

(a) 

Represents Delta’s contributions to the Delta 401(k) Retirement Plan, a broad-based tax qualified defined contribution plan, based on the same fixed and matching contribution formula applicable to all participants in this plan.

(b) 

Represents amounts paid directly to the named executive officer that Delta would have contributed to the officer’s account under the Delta 401(k) Retirement Plan absent limits applicable to such plans under the Internal Revenue Code. These payments are based on the same fixed and matching contribution formula applicable to all participants in this plan and are available to any plan participant affected by such limits.

(c) 

Represents tax reimbursements for flight benefits as described below.

(d) 

The amounts consist of an annual physical examination for officers and flight benefits as described below. Mr. West did not receive perquisites or other personal benefits with a total incremental cost of $10,000 or more, the threshold for reporting under SEC rules. From time to time, the named executive officers attend events sponsored by Delta at no incremental cost to Delta.

As is common in the airline industry, Delta provides complimentary travel and certain Delta Sky Club® privileges for named executive officers; the officer’s spouse, domestic partner or designated companion; the officer’s children and parents; and, to a limited extent, other persons designated by the officer.

Complimentary travel for such other persons is limited to an aggregate imputed value of $20,000 per year for the Chief Executive Officer, President and Senior Executive Vice President and $15,000 per year for executive vice presidents. Delta reimburses the officer for associated taxes on complimentary travel with an imputed tax value of up to $25,000 per year for the Chief Executive Officer, President and Senior Executive Vice President and $20,000 per year for Executive Vice Presidents. Unused portions of the annual allowances described in the previous two sentences accumulate and may be carried into succeeding years during employment. Complimentary travel is provided to the surviving spouse or domestic partner of eligible officers after the eligible officer’s death. Delta will not reimburse surviving spouses or domestic partners for associated taxes on complimentary travel under the survivor travel benefit. Delta’s incremental cost of providing flight benefits includes incremental fuel expense and the incremental cost on a flight segment basis for customer service expenses such as meals, onboard expenses, baggage handling, insurance, airport security and aircraft cleaning. In addition, each named executive officer was eligible to purchase private jet flights from a Delta subsidiary by paying the incremental cost of the flight. Also, certain named executive officers have flight benefits on another airline at no incremental cost to the officers or Delta.

(a)Represents Delta’s contributions to the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan, a broad-based tax qualified defined contribution plan, based on the same fixed and matching contribution formula applicable to all participants in this plan.
(8) 

(b)Represents amounts paid directly to the named executive officer that Delta would have contributed to the officer’s account under the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan absent limits applicable to such plans under the Internal Revenue Code. These payments are based on the same fixed and matching contribution formula applicable to all participants in this plan and are available to any plan participant affected by such limits.

(c)Represents the annual premium on supplemental life insurance coverage equal to two times base salary that Delta provided to named executive officers. Life insurance benefits were eliminated for all officers in July 2015.

(d)Represents tax reimbursements for flight benefits as described below.

(e)The amounts consist of financial planning services, home security services, an annual physical examination for officers and flight benefits as described below, except Mr. Bastian did not have costs for financial planning services or annual physical examination and Mr. West did not have costs for home security services. Financial planning and home security protection benefits were eliminated for all officers in January 2016. From time to time, the named executive officers attend events sponsored by Delta at no incremental cost to Delta.

As is common in the airline industry, Delta provides complimentary travel and certain Delta Sky Club privileges for named executive officers; the officer’s spouse, domestic partner or designated companion; the officer’s children and parents; and, to a limited extent, other persons designated by the officer.

Complimentary travel for such other persons is limited to an aggregate imputed value of $20,000 per year for the Chief Executive Officer and President and $15,000 per year for executive vice presidents. Delta reimburses the officer for associated taxes on complimentary travel with an imputed tax value of up to $25,000 per year for the Chief Executive Officer and President and $20,000 per year for executive vice presidents. Unused portions of the annual allowances described in the previous two sentences accumulate and may be carried into succeeding years during employment. Complimentary travel is provided to the surviving spouse or domestic partner of eligible officers after the eligible officer’s death. Delta will not reimburse surviving spouses or domestic partners for associated taxes on complimentary travel under the survivor travel benefit. Delta’s incremental cost of providing flight benefits includes incremental fuel expense and the incremental cost on a flight segment basis for customer service expenses such as meals, onboard expenses, baggage handling, insurance, airport security and aircraft cleaning. In addition, certain named executive officers have flight benefits on another airline at no incremental cost to Delta.

(8)As required by SEC rules, the amount in the “Total” column for each named executive officer represents the sum of the amounts in all the other columns. As discussed in footnote (1) above, the amounts in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns do not represent amounts the named executive officers received or are entitled to receive. Rather, these amounts represent the aggregate fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. The amounts do not reflect the risk the awards may be forfeited in certain circumstances, for awards subject to performance conditions, the risk there is no payout or in the case of performance stock options, there is no vesting, because the performance conditions are not met.

 

(9)Mr. West became Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer on March 1, 2014.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     37


Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION46DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table provides information about annual and long-term award opportunities granted to the named executive officers during 20152019 under the 20152019 MIP and the 2015 LTIP.2019 LTIP and, in addition, for Mr. Carter a restricted stock award under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Performance Compensation Plan. These award opportunities are described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the proxy statement under “Elements of Compensation — Annual Incentives”Incentive” and “Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentives.”Incentives” beginning on page 29.

Name/Type of Award

 Grant
Date(1)
  Date of
Personnel
& Compen-
sation
Committee
or Board
Action
  Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan  Awards(3)
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(4)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(5)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)(6)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(7)
 
   Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
     

Richard H. Anderson

            

2015 MIP

  1/1/2015    12/9/2014    800,000    1,600,000    3,200,000         

2015 LTIP — Performance Award

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015       1,916,667    3,833,333    7,666,666       3,833,333  

2015 LTIP — Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015          83,090      3,833,773  

2015 LTIP — Performance Stock Options

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015           175,770    46.14    3,833,544  

Edward H. Bastian

            

2015 MIP

  1/1/2015    12/9/2014    546,875    1,093,750    2,187,500         

2015 LTIP — Performance Award

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015       1,000,000    2,000,000    4,000,000       2,000,000  

2015 LTIP — Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015          43,350      2,000,169  

2015 LTIP — Performance Stock Options

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015           91,710    46.14    2,000,195  

Glen W. Hauenstein

            

2015 MIP

  1/1/2015    12/9/2014    423,750    847,500    1,695,000         

2015 LTIP — Performance Award

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015       1,187,500    2,375,000    4,750,000       2,375,000  

2015 LTIP — Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015          51,480      2,375,287  

Paul A. Jacobson

            

2015 MIP

  1/1/2015    12/9/2014    393,750    787,500    1,575,000         

2015 LTIP — Performance Award

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015       887,500    1,775,000    3,550,000       1,775,000  

2015 LTIP — Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015          38,470      1,775,006  

W. Gil West

            

2015 MIP

  1/1/2015    12/9/2014    405,000    810,000    1,620,000         

2015 LTIP — Performance Award

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015       937,500    1,875,000    3,750,000       1,875,000  

2015 LTIP — Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015    2/5/2015          40,640      1,875,130  

Name/Type of Award

Grant

Date(1)

Date of

Personnel &

Compensation

Committee

or Board

Action

Estimated Possible Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(2)

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(3)

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)(4)

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)(5)

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/Sh)(6)

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards

($)(7)

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Edward H. Bastian

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 MIP

1/1/2019

12/11/2018

945,834

1,891,667

3,783,334

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 LTIP - Performance Award

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

2,125,000

4,250,000

8,500,000

 

 

 

4,250,000

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

81,660

 

 

4,125,463

2019 LTIP - Performance
Stock Options

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

381,600

50.52

4,125,096

Glen W. Hauenstein

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 MIP

1/1/2019

12/11/2018

612,500

1,225,000

2,450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 LTIP - Performance Award

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

1,147,500

2,295,000

4,590,000

 

 

 

2,295,000

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,100

 

 

2,227,932

2019 LTIP - Performance
Stock Options

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

206,060

50.52

2,227,509

W. Gil West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 MIP

1/1/2019

12/11/2018

612,500

1,225,000

2,450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 LTIP - Performance Award

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

1,147,500

2,295,000

4,590,000

 

 

 

2,295,000

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,100

 

 

2,227,932

2019 LTIP - Performance
Stock Options

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

206,060

50.52

2,227,509

Paul A. Jacobson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 MIP

1/1/2019

12/11/2018

412,500

825,000

1,650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 LTIP - Performance Award

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

760,000

1,520,000

3,040,000

 

 

 

1,520,000

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,300

 

 

1,480,236

2019 LTIP - Performance
Stock Options

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92,510

50.52

1,000,033

Peter W. Carter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 MIP

1/1/2019

12/11/2018

343,750

687,500

1,375,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 LTIP - Performance Award

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

532,000

1,064,000

2,128,000

 

 

 

1,064,000

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,510

 

 

1,036,165

2019 LTIP - Performance
Stock Options

2/6/2019

2/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,760

50.52

700,056

2019 Restricted Stock

12/4/2019

12/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,460

 

 

250,028

(1) 

For purposes of this column, the grant date for the 2019 MIP is the date the performance period began. The grant date for the 2019 LTIP is the grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date determined under FASB ASC Topic 718.

(2) 

These columns show the annual award opportunities under the 2019 MIP. For additional information about the 2019 MIP, see footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table and the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the proxy statement under “Elements of Compensation — Annual Incentive” on page 29.

(3)

These columns show the long-term award opportunities under the performance award component of the 2019 LTIP. For additional information about the 2019 LTIP, see footnotes 2 and 3 to the Summary Compensation Table and the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement under “Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentives” on page 30.

(4) 

This column shows the restricted stock component of the 2019 LTIP and, in addition for Mr. Carter, a restricted stock award.

(5) 

This column shows the performance stock option component of the 2019 LTIP. For additional information about the performance stock option component of the 2019 LTIP, see footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table.

(6) 

The exercise price is equal to the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

(7) 

The amounts in this column do not represent amounts the named executive officers received or are entitled to receive. Rather, the reported amounts represent the fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. For awards subject to performance conditions, the value shown is based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. The amounts do not reflect the risk that the awards may be forfeited in certain circumstances or, in the case of performance awards, that there is no payout, or in the case of performance stock options, that there is no vesting, if the required performance measures are not met.

 

(1)ir.delta.comFor purposes of this column, the grant date for the 2015 MIP is the date the performance period began. The grant date for the 2015 LTIP is the grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date determined under FASB ASC Topic 718.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     38


(2)These columns show the annual award opportunities under the 2015 MIP. For additional information about the 2015 MIP, see footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table and the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the proxy statement under “Elements of Compensation — Annual Incentives.”

(3)These columns show the long-term award opportunities under the performance award component of the 2015 LTIP. For additional information about the 2015 LTIP, see footnotes 2 and 3 to the Summary Compensation Table and the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement under “Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentives.”

(4)This column shows the restricted stock component of the 2015 LTIP.

(5)This column shows the performance stock option component of the 2015 LTIP. For additional information about the performance stock option component of the 2015 LTIP, see footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table.

(6)The exercise price is equal to the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

(7)The amounts in this column do not represent amounts the named executive officers received or are entitled to receive. Rather, the reported amounts represent the fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. For awards subject to performance conditions, the value shown is based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the applicable grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date. The amounts do not reflect the risk that the awards may be forfeited in certain circumstances or, in the case of performance awards, that there is no payout, or in the case of performance stock options, that there is no vesting, if the required performance measures are not met.
Back to Contents

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.47EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table provides information regarding the outstanding equity awards on December 31, 20152019 for each of the named executive officers.

Name

 Grant
Date(1)
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)

Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)(2)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)(3)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)(4)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(5)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(6)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

Richard H. Anderson

          

2013 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/7/2013                        78,513    3,979,824          

2014 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/6/2014                        103,346    5,238,609          

2015 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015                        83,090    4,211,832          

Stock Options

  9/1/2007    264,300            16.88    8/31/2017                  

2008 LTIP-Stock Options

  4/3/2008    126,390            8.81    4/2/2018                  

Merger Award-Stock Options

  10/29/2008    1,520,000            7.99    10/28/2018                  

2012 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/2/2012    318,840            11.10    2/1/2022                  

2013 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/7/2013    166,667    83.333        14.86    2/6/2023                  

2014 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/6/2014    84,234    168,466        30.89    2/5/2024                  

2015 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/5/2015            175,770    46.14    2/4/2025                  

Edward H. Bastian

          

2013 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/7/2013                        39,256    1,989,887          

2014 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/6/2014                        43,166    2,188,085          

2015 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015                        43,350    2,197,412          

Stock Options

  6/4/2007    142,900            18.84    4/29/2017                  

Stock Options

  9/1/2007    60,100            16.88    8/31/2017                  

2012 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/2/2012    159,240            11.10    2/1/2022                  

2013 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/7/2013    83,334    41,666        14.86    2/6/2023                  

2014 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/6/2014    43,947    87,893        30.89    2/5/2024                  

2015 LTIP-Performance Stock Options

  2/5/2015            91,710    46.14    2/4/2025                  

Glen W. Hauenstein

          

2013 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/7/2013                        24,116    1,222,440          

2014 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/6/2014                        37,773    1,914,713          

2015 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015                        51,480    2,609,521          

Stock Options

  6/4/2007    105,500            18.84    4/29/2017                  

Stock Options

  11/1/2007    67,000            20.20    10/31/2017                  

2008 LTIP-Stock Options

  4/3/2008    31,600            8.81    4/2/2018                  

Paul A. Jacobson

          

2013 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/7/2013                        20,750    1,051,818          

2014 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/6/2014                        27,520    1,394,989          

2015 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015                        38,470    1,950,044          

Stock Options

  6/4/2007    40,100            18.84    4/29/2017                  

2008 LTIP-Stock Options

  4/3/2008    7,900            8.81    4/2/2018                  

Merger Award-Stock Options

  10/29/2008    123,000            7.99    10/28/2018                  

W. Gil West

          

2013 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/7/2013                        20,750    1,051,818          

2014 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/6/2014                        27,520    1,394,989          

2015 LTIP-Restricted Stock

  2/5/2015                        40,640    2,060,042          

Name

Grant

Date(1)

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options

(#)(2)

Option

Exercise

Price

($)(3)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number

of Shares

or Units

of Stock

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)(4)

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)(5)

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (#)(6)

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested ($)

Edward H. Bastian

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/9/2017

-

-

-

-

-

 

22,300

1,304,104

-

-

2018 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/8/2018

-

-

-

-

-

 

49,386

2,888,093

-

-

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

-

-

-

-

-

 

81,660

4,775,477

-

-

2014 LTIP - Performance Stock Options

2/6/2014

71,840

-

-

30.89

2/5/2024

 

-

-

-

-

2015 LTIP - Performance Stock Options

2/5/2015

91,710

-

-

46.14

2/4/2025

 

-

-

-

-

2016 LTIP - Performance Stock Options

2/2/2016

173,230

-

-

43.61

2/1/2026

 

-

-

-

-

2017 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/9/2017

137,674

68,836

-

49.33

2/8/2027

 

-

-

-

-

2018 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/8/2018

102,347

204,693

-

51.23

2/7/2028

 

-

-

-

-

2019 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/6/2019

-

-

381,600

50.52

2/5/2029

 

-

-

-

-

Glen W. Hauenstein

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/9/2017

-

-

-

-

-

 

13,380

782,462

-

-

2018 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/8/2018

-

-

-

-

-

 

25,766

1,506,796

-

-

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

-

-

-

-

-

 

44,100

2,578,968

-

-

2017 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/9/2017

82,607

41,303

-

49.33

2/8/2027

 

-

-

-

-

2018 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/8/2018

53,400

106,800

-

51.23

2/7/2028

 

-

-

-

-

2019 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/6/2019

-

-

206,060

50.52

2/5/2029

 

-

-

-

-

W. Gil West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/9/2017

-

-

-

-

-

 

13,126

767,608

-

-

2018 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/8/2018

-

-

-

-

-

 

25,766

1,506,796

-

-

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

-

-

-

-

-

 

44,100

2,578,968

-

-

2017 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/9/2017

54,760

27,380

-

49.33

2/8/2027

 

-

-

-

-

2018 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/8/2018

53,400

106,800

-

51.23

2/7/2028

 

-

-

-

-

2019 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/6/2019

-

-

206,060

50.52

2/5/2029

 

-

-

-

-

 

(1)For purposes of this column, the grant date for the awards is the grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date determined under FASB ASC Topic 718.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     39


Back to Contents

Name

Grant

Date(1)

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options

(#)(2)

Option

Exercise

Price

($)(3)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number

of Shares

or Units

of Stock

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)(4)

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)(5)

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (#)(6)

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested ($)

Paul A. Jacobson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/9/2017

-

-

-

-

-

 

10,003

584,975

-

-

2018 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/8/2018

-

-

-

-

-

 

19,260

1,126,325

-

-

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

-

-

-

-

-

 

29,300

1,713,464

-

-

2017 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/9/2017

41,720

20,860

-

49.33

2/8/2027

 

-

-

-

-

2018 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/8/2018

26,970

53,940

-

51.23

2/7/2028

 

-

-

-

-

2019 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/6/2019

-

-

92,510

50.52

2/5/2029

 

-

-

-

-

Peter W. Carter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/9/2017

-

-

-

-

-

 

6,376

372,868

-

-

2018 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/8/2018

-

-

-

-

-

 

12,280

718,134

-

-

2019 LTIP - Restricted Stock

2/6/2019

-

-

-

-

-

 

20,510

1,199,425

-

-

2019 Restricted Stock

12/4/2019

-

-

-

-

-

 

4,460

260,821

-

-

2017 LTIP - Performance Stock Options

2/9/2017

26,600

13,300

-

49.33

2/8/2027

 

-

-

-

-

2018 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/8/2018

17,194

34,386

-

51.23

2/7/2028

 

-

-

-

-

2019 LTIP Performance Stock Options

2/6/2019

-

-

64,760

50.52

2/5/2029

 

-

-

-

-

(1) 

For purposes of this column, the grant date for the awards is the grant date or, if earlier, the service inception date determined under FASB ASC Topic 718.

(2) 

The 2019 LTIP Performance Stock Options vest as follows: (a) if there is a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2019, then ratably over three years with 1/3 vesting on each of February 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022; (b) if there is no payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2019, but there is a payout for 2020, then 2/3 vest on February 1, 2021 and 1/3 vest on February 1, 2022; and (c) if there is no payout for 2019 or 2020 under the Profit Sharing Program, then the options will be forfeited. Because there was a payout for 2019 under the Profit Sharing Program, the options vest as described in (a) of the foregoing sentence, except that the first vesting date occurred on February 5, 2020, the date on which the Personnel & Compensation Committee certified the satisfaction of the performance measure. Performance stock options are subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.

(3) 

The exercise price of the stock options is the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on the applicable grant date.

(4) 

These shares of restricted stock vest as follows:

February 9, 2017 LTIP Grant Date. In equal installments on February 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

February 8, 2018 LTIP Grant Date. In equal installments on February 1, 2019, 2020 and 2021.

February 6, 2019 LTIP Grant Date. In equal installments on February 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

2019 Restricted Stock grant to Mr. Carter. In equal installments on December 4, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Restricted stock is subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.

(5) 

In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts in this column for the market value of restricted stock are based on the $58.48 closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2019.

(6) 

This table does not include the performance award component of the 2019 LTIP, 2018 LTIP and the 2017 LTIP because (a) these award opportunities are denominated in dollars and (b) the payout, if any, earned by the named executive officers will be made in stock based on achievement of the pre-established performance measures during the measurement periods for each program. For additional information about the performance award component of the 2019 LTIP, see footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table above.

 

(2)ir.delta.com

The 2015 LTIP Performance Stock Options vest as follows: (a) if there is a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2015, then ratably over three years with 1/3 vesting on each of February 1, 2016, 2017 and 2018; (b) if there is no payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2015, but there is a payout for 2016, then 2/3 vest on February 1, 2017 and 1/3 vest on February 1, 2018; and (c) if there is no payout for 2015 or 2016 under the Profit Sharing Program, then the options  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     40


Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION48DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


will be forfeited. Because there was a payout for 2015 under the Profit Sharing Program, the options vest as described in (a) of the foregoing sentence, except that the first vesting date occurred on February 2, 2016, the date on which the P&C Committee certified the satisfaction of the performance measure. Performance stock options are subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.

(3)The exercise price of the stock options — other than those granted on September 1, 2007 — is the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on the applicable grant date. The exercise price of the stock options granted on Saturday, September 1, 2007 is the closing price of the common stock on the NYSE on Friday, August 31, 2007, the last trading day immediately preceding the grant date.

(4)These shares of restricted stock vest as follows:

February 7, 2013 LTIP Grant. In equal installments on February 1, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

February 6, 2014 LTIP Grant Date. In equal installments on February 1, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

February 5, 2015 LTIP Grant Date. In equal installments on February 1, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Restricted stock is subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances.

(5)In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts in this column for the market value of restricted stock are based on the $50.69 closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2015.

(6)This table does not include the performance award component of the 2015 LTIP, 2014 LTIP and the 2013 LTIP because (a) these award opportunities are denominated in dollars and (b) the payout, if any, earned by the named executive officers will be made in stock based on achievement of the average annual operating income margin, the return on invested capital and customer service performance measures during the measurement periods for each program. For additional information about the performance award component of the 2015 LTIP, see footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in this proxy statement.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table provides information regarding the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock for the named executive officers in 2015.2019.

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
   Value Realized
on  Exercise
($) (1)
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting
($) (2)
 

Richard H. Anderson

   0     0     342,772     15,667,778  

Edward H. Bastian

   511,090     21,593,934     196,919     9,041,853  

Glen W. Hauenstein

   0     0     173,658     8,047,210  

Paul A. Jacobson

   70,000     2,700,320     106,348     4,886,291  

W. Gil West

   0     0     106,348     4,886,291  

(1)The value realized on exercise is based on the difference between the market price on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options.

(2)The value realized on vesting is based on the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on the applicable vesting date. These amounts represent the vesting of award opportunities granted in 2012, 2013 and 2014.

Name

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Exercise (#)

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Vesting (#)

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)(1)

Edward H. Bastian

-

-

 

155,786

8,526,424

Glen W. Hauenstein

-

-

 

99,337

5,408,659

W. Gil West

-

-

 

93,198

5,092,279

Paul A. Jacobson

-

-

 

72,282

3,973,428

Peter W. Carter

-

-

 

46,080

2,513,952

(1) 

The value realized on vesting is based on the closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on the applicable vesting date. These amounts represent the vesting of award opportunities granted in 2016, 2017 and 2018.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.49EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Post-Employment Compensation

Defined Benefit Pension Benefits

Qualified Nonpilot Retirement Plan. The Delta Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”)(Retirement Plan) is a broad-based, non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plan for Delta nonpilotDelta’s ground and flight attendant employees. To participate in the Retirement Plan, a nonpilotan employee must have completed 12 months of service before the plan was frozen on December 31, 2005. As a result, Mr. Bastian and Mr. Jacobson are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan, but Mr. Anderson,Carter, Mr. Hauenstein and Mr. West are not. We do not offer any supplemental executive retirement plans or deferred compensation plans to ourthe named executive officers.

UntilEligible ground and flight attendant employees hired (or rehired) on or before July 1, 2003, benefits for participants in thereceive Retirement Plan including the eligible named executive officers, were calculated using onlybenefits based on a final average earnings formula (“FAE formula”). Under this formula,(FAE) formula. Effective July 1, 2003, the benefit isRetirement Plan transitioned to a cash balance plan and benefits for ground and flight attendant employees hired (or rehired) after that date are generally based solely on the cash balance formula. Retirement Plan participants who were employed on July 1, 2003, receive Retirement Plan benefits based on the higher of the FAE and cash balance formulas.

Under the cash balance formula, 6% of a participant’s pay (base salary and, if any, eligible annual incentive compensation) was credited annually until January 1, 2006, to a hypothetical account, which account is credited with an employee’sannual interest credit based on a market rate of interest. Interest credits will continue to be credited annually regardless of the plan’s frozen status. At termination of employment, an amount equal to the balance of the participant’s cash balance account is payable to the participant, at his or her election, in the form of an immediate or deferred lump sum or equivalent monthly benefit.

Benefits under the FAE formula are based on a participant’s (1) final average earnings; (2) years of service prior to January 1, 2006; (3) age when the payment of benefits begins (which maybenefit payments begin (but not be before age 52); and (4) primary Social Security benefit. Final average earnings are the average of an employee’sthe participant’s highest average monthly earnings (based on the employee’s(base salary and, if any, eligible annual incentive compensation, if any)compensation) for the 36 consecutive months in the 120-month period immediately preceding the earlier of termination of employment orand January 1, 2006. The monthly retirement benefit payable at the normal retirement age of 65 is determined by multiplyingequals 60% of the participant’s final average earnings, by 60%, and then reducing that amountreduced for years of service of less than 30 years with Delta(determined as of December 31, 2005) and by 50% of the participants’ primary Social Security benefit payable to the employee. The 50% Social Security offset is also(also reduced for service of less than 30 years. Participants become fully vested in their FAE formula benefits after completing three years of service.service). Benefits determined under the FAE formula are paid in the form of a monthly annuity.

Effective July 1, 2003, the Retirement Plan was amended to transition to a cash balance formula. Generally, for employees hired (or rehired) after July 1, 2003, retirement benefits earned after that date are based only on the cash balance formula. Under this formula, each participant has an account, for recordkeeping purposes only, to which pay credits were allocated annually until January 1, 2006. These pay credits were based on 6% of a participant’s salary and eligible annual incentive compensation, if any. In addition, all balances in a participant’s account are credited with an annual interest credit which is currently based on a market rate of interest (the “Annual Interest Credit”). Participants become fully vested in their cash balance formula benefits after completing three years of service. At termination of employment, an amount equal to the then-vested balance of a participant’s cash balance account is payable to the participant, at his election, in the form of an immediate or deferred lump sum (to the extent the lump sum payment is available under the Internal Revenue Code) or equivalent monthly annuity benefit.

Employees covered by the Retirement Plan who were employed on July 1, 2003 are eligible for transition benefits as long as they remained continuously employed. For the period that began July 1, 2003 and ended December 31, 2005, these employees earned retirement benefits equal to the greater of the benefit determined under the Retirement Plan’s FAE formula or its cash balance formula.

Effective December 31, 2005, the Retirement Plan was amended (1) to freeze accrual of future benefits attributable to years of service and pay increases after December 31, 2005 under the FAE formula; and (2) to cease pay credits under the cash balance formula. Effective March 31, 2007, all benefits under the Retirement Plan were frozen; however, Annual Interest Credits will continue to be added to the cash balance account after December 31, 2005.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION50DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     41


Back to Contents

Pension Benefits Table

The table below shows certain pension benefit information for Mr. Bastian and Mr. Jacobson as of December 31, 2015. The table does not include any information for Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hauenstein or Mr. West because they are not eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan.2019.

Name

Name

Plan Name

Number of Years

Years of Credited Service

Credited

Service (as(as of

December 31,

2015) 2019)(1)

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefits ($)(2)

Payments During

During

Last Fiscal Year

Mr. Bastian(3)

Delta Retirement Plan


6 years,

10 months



FAE Formula: 236,705
301,878

Cash Balance Formula: 66,39970,272


0

0

Mr. Jacobson(4)

Delta Retirement Plan


8 years,

2 months



FAE Formula: 78,829
119,754

Cash Balance Formula: 7,7389,283


0

0

(1)

As discussed above, the Retirement Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2005, and no additional service credit will accrue after that date. All years of service reflected in this column include service until December 31, 2005.

(2) 

(2)

Benefits were calculated using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in our financial statements (see “Assumptions” in Note 910 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Delta’s 20152019 Form 10-K). In addition, certain individual data were used in developing these values. Benefits accrued under the FAE formula and the cash balance formula are listed separately. For purposes of the FAE formula benefit, the assumed retirement age is 62. The form of benefit payable under the FAE formula for Mr. Bastian and Mr. Jacobson is a single life annuity.

(3)

Mr. Bastian resigned from Delta as of April 1, 2005, and rejoined Delta in July 2005. His years of credited service include the 6 years, 5 months of service he had completed as of April 1, 2005. As a result, the portion of his benefit calculated under the FAE formula was determined under the rules applicable to vested employees who terminate their service with Delta prior to early retirement age instead of under the rules applicable to retirees at early retirement age. Accordingly, Mr. Bastian’s benefit is smaller than it would have been had he retired at early retirement age. All benefits earned by Mr. Bastian after he rejoined Delta in July 2005 are based solely on the cash balance formula.

(4)

Mr. Jacobson resigned from Delta as of March 18, 2005, and rejoined Delta in August 2005. His years of credited service include the 7 years, 10 months of service he had completed as of March 18, 2005. As a result, the portion of his benefit calculated under the FAE formula was determined under the rules applicable to vested employees who terminate their service with Delta prior to early retirement age instead of under the rules applicable to retirees at early retirement age. Accordingly, Mr. Jacobson’s benefit is smaller than it would have been had he retired at early retirement age. In addition, following his resignation in March 2005, Mr. Jacobson elected to receive the cash balance portion of his benefit in a lump sum payment. All benefits earned by Mr. Jacobson after he rejoined Delta in August 2005 are based solely on the cash balance formula.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.51EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Potential Post-Employment Benefits upon Termination or Change in Control

This section describes the potential benefits that may be received by ourthe named executive officers in the event ofmay receive under certain terminationstermination of employment or, in limited circumstances,scenarios, including in connection with a change in control, assuming termination of employment on December 31, 2015.2019.

Severance Plan. The definitions of “cause,” “change in control,” “disability,” “good reason” and “retirement,” as such terms are used in the following sections, are summarized below.

SEVERANCE PLAN

Officers and director level employees are generally eligible to participate in Delta’s 2009 Officer and Director Severance Plan (“Severance Plan”).(Severance Plan), which may be amended at any time by Delta. The following tablechart summarizes the principal benefits the named executive officers are eligible to receive under the Severance Plan. The Severance Plan may be amended at any time by the Company.

Name

Termination by DeltaWithout Cause

Without
Cause (no(no Change in
Control)
(1)

Resignation for Good Reason

(no Change in Control)(1)

Termination without Cause or Resignation by the
Executive

for Good Reason (no
Change
in Control)

Termination by Delta
without Cause or
Resignation by the
Executive for Good
Reason
in Connection with a

Change in Control(1)(2)

Mr. Anderson

and Mr. Bastian

•     24 months base salary

•     200% target MIP

•     24 months benefitshealthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

•     24 months base salary

•     200% target MIP

•     24 months benefitshealthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

•     24 months base salary

•     200% target MIP

•     24 months benefitshealthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

Mr. Hauenstein

Mr. Jacobson and

Mr. West

24 months base salary

200% target MIP

24 months healthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

•     None

24 months base salary

200% target MIP

24 months healthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

Mr. Carter and
Mr. Jacobson

18 months base salary

•     150% target MIP

•     18 months benefitshealthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

None

•     None

•     18 months base salary

•     150% target MIP

•     18 months benefitshealthcare benefit continuation

outplacement services

(1)

The cash severance amount (base salary plus target MIP) is paid in a lump sum following termination of employment. Outplacement services fees are limited to $5,000.

(2)

These benefits apply if the termination of employment occurs during the two-year period after a change in control.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     42


Back to Contents

To receive benefits under the Severance Plan, executive officersparticipants must enter into a general release of claims against Delta and non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidentiality covenants for the benefit of Delta.

Under the Severance Plan, the cash severance amount is paid in a lump sum following termination of employment. For purposes of the chart above, “benefits continuation” means continuation of certain medical, dental and vision benefits for which the COBRA premiums will be waived for the participant’s severance period. (In July 2015, company-provided basic life insurance coverage was eliminated for all officers; accordingly, the Severance Plan was amended to eliminate continuation of such coverage during the participant’s severance period.) In addition, executive officers are eligible for reimbursement of expenses for financial planning services through the end of the year in which the termination occurred and outplacement services with fees not to exceed $5,000. (In January 2016, financial planning services reimbursement was eliminated for all officers both during and following the officer’s employment.)

The Severance Plan does not provide for any excise tax gross-ups for benefits received in connection with a change in control. If a participant is entitled to benefits under the Severance Plan in connection with a change in control, the amount of such benefits will be reduced to the statutory safe harbor under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code if this results in a greater after taxafter-tax benefit than if the participant paid the excise tax.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION52DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Other Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to receive certain additional benefits inThe following chart summarizes the eventtreatment of certain terminations of employment or in connection with a change in control. The definitions of “cause,” “change in control,” “disability” and “good reason,” as such terms are used in the following sections, are summarized below.

The 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program. If a participant’s employment is terminated (1) by Delta without cause or by the participant for good reason in connection with a change in control or (2) due to death or disability, the participant’s performance award (including any Earned Awards1) andawards, restricted stock award will immediately vest, with the performance award paid in cash at the target level (or, for any Earned Award, at the level at which it was earned). In addition, with respect to theand performance stock options awarded to Mr. Andersonunder Delta’s long-term incentive programs (LTIP) for 2017, 2018 and Mr. Bastian, if their employment is terminated for the foregoing reasons, such awards will immediately vest2019 and become exercisable.

For named executive officers other than the Chief Financial Officer, if an executive officer’s employment is terminated on or after October 1, 2015 for any reason other than by Delta for cause, he will continue to be eligible to receive his performance award,a restricted stock award and, if applicable, performance stock option award pursuantprovided to the same vesting, performance and general payment provisions as if his employment had continued. In consideration for this treatment, these named executive officers entered into award agreements containing enhanced non-competition and non-solicitation covenants for the benefit of Delta. In the event the executive breaches such covenants during the two-year period following hisMr. Carter under various termination of employment he will forfeit any outstanding awards.

If the Chief Financial Officer’s or, if prior to October 1, 2015, the other named executive officer’s employment is terminated (1) by Delta without cause or (2) by him for good reason without a change in control, he will receive any Earned Awards, a pro-rated performance award2 under the same vesting, performance and general payment provisions as if his employment had continued, and the immediate vesting of a pro rata portion of his restricted stock award and, if applicable, performance stock option award. Any remaining portions will be forfeited. In addition, if the executive terminates his employment without good reason, the entire performance award (including any Earned Awards), restricted stock award and, if applicable, performance stock option award will be forfeited.

In all cases, if a participant’s employment is terminated by Delta for cause, the participant’s performance award (including any Earned Awards), restricted stock award and, if applicable, performance stock option award will be forfeited.

The 2014 Long-Term Incentive Program. The awards under the 2014 LTIP are subject to the same termination provisions applicable to awards under the 2015 LTIP, except the named executive officers, other than the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, would be eligible for the treatment described in the second paragraph of the “The 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program” section above in the event of their termination for any reason other than by Delta for cause on or after October 1, 2014.

The 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program. The awards under the 2013 LTIP are subject to the same termination provisions applicable to awards under the 2015 LTIP, except the named executive officers, other than the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, would be eligible for the treatment described in the second paragraph of the “The 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program” section above in the event of their termination for any reason other than by Delta for cause regardless of the date such termination occurred.scenarios.

 

1 For the portion of the performance award attributable to the return on invested capital performance measure, achievement of such measure is determined independently for each calendar year during the applicable performance period (each an “ROIC Installment”) and, to the extent that Delta’s actual performance meets or exceeds the threshold level at the end of each calendar year, each such ROIC Installment will be treated as an “Earned Award.” Generally, Earned Awards, if any, will accumulate until the end of the performance period at which time all Earned Awards will vest and become payable.

2 The portion of the performance award attributable to the return on invested capital performance measure will be pro-rated as follows: for any ROIC Installment (as defined in the footnote above) outstanding in the year in which the termination occurred, he will receive the ROIC Installment based on actual performance for the applicable year, pro-rated based on the number of months he was employed with Delta during the year. Any remaining ROIC Installment(s) will be forfeited.

Termination Scenario

LTIP Award Treatment

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason without a Change in Control and Retirement

Mr. Bastian, Mr. Hauenstein and Mr. West

53

The named executive officer will remain eligible to receive his performance award, restricted stock award and performance stock option award pursuant to the same vesting, performance and general payment provisions as if his employment had continued.(1)(2)

Mr. Carter and Mr. Jacobson

The named executive officer will receive a prorated performance award and a prorated performance stock option award under the same vesting, performance and general payment provisions as if his employment had continued and the immediate vesting of a pro rata portion of his restricted stock award. Any remaining portions will be forfeited.

Resignation without Good Reason

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Mr. Bastian, Mr. Hauenstein and Mr. West

The named executive officer will remain eligible to receive his performance award, restricted stock award and performance stock option award pursuant to the same vesting, performance and general payment provisions as if his employment had continued.(1)(2)

Mr. Carter and Mr. Jacobson

The named executive officer’s performance award, restricted stock award and performance stock option award will be immediately forfeited.

Termination for Cause

The named executive officer’s performance award, restricted stock award and performance stock option award will be immediately forfeited.

TerminationduetoDeath

orDisability

The named executive officer’s performance award, restricted stock award and performance stock option award will immediately vest, with the performance award paid at the target level.

Termination without
Cause or Resignation for Good Reason with a Change in Control

The named executive officer’s performance award, restricted stock award and performance stock option award will immediately vest, with the performance award paid at the target level.

(1)

In order for the named executive officer to be eligible for this treatment, his termination of employment must have occurred on or after (i) October 1, 2017 under the 2017 LTIP; (iii) October 1, 2018 under the 2018 LTIP; and (iii) October 1, 2019 under the 2019 LTIP. For terminations of employment prior to such dates, the awards granted to the named executive officer under each of the LTIPs would be subject to the same treatment as described for Mr. Carter and Mr. Jacobson.

(2)

In consideration for this treatment, these named executive officers entered into award agreements containing enhanced non-competition and non-solicitation covenants for the benefit of Delta. In the event the executive breaches such covenants during the two-year period following employment, he will forfeit any outstanding awards.


ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

2015Delta’s 2019 Management Incentive Plan. The 2015 MIP (MIP) generally provides that a participant whose employment with Delta terminates prior to the end of the workday on December 31, 20152019 is not eligible for a 20152019 MIP payment. If, however, the participant’s employment is terminated (1) due to death or disabilitydisability; (2) due to retirement; or (2)(3) by Delta without cause or for any other reason that would entitle the participant to benefits under the Severance Plan, the participant is eligible for a pro rata 20152019 MIP payment based on (a) the number of monthsdays during 20152019 the participant was employed in a MIP-qualified position and (b) the terms and conditions of the 20152019 MIP that would have applied if his or her employment had continued through December 31, 2015.2019.

Triggering Events. TRIGGERING EVENTS

As noted above, eligibility for severance benefits and acceleration of the vesting of equity awards are triggered by certain events. The terms “cause,” “change in control,” “disability”“disability,” “good reason” and “good reason,“retirement,” as they apply to ourthe named executive officers, are summarized below.

Cause means, in general, a person’s (1) continued, substantial failure to perform his duties with Delta; (2) misconduct which is economically injurious to Delta; (3) conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, fraud, theft, embezzlement or dishonesty; or (4) material violation of any material Delta policy or rule regarding conduct.

A person has ten business days to cure, if curable, any of the events which could lead to a termination for cause. For executive vice presidents or more senior executives, a termination for cause must be approved by a 2/3 vote of the entire Board of Directors.

Change in control means, in general, the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) any person becomes the beneficial

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     43


Back to Contents

owner of more than 35% of Delta common stock; (2) during a period of 12 consecutive months, the Board of Directors at the beginning of the period and their approved successors cease to constitute a majority of the Board; (3) the consummation of a merger or consolidation involving Delta, other than a merger or consolidation which results in the Delta common stock outstanding immediately before the transaction continuing to represent more than 65% of the Delta common stock outstanding immediately after the transaction; or (4) a sale, lease or other transfer of Delta’s assets whichthat have a total gross fair market value greater than 40% of the total gross fair market value of Delta’s assets immediately before the transaction.

Disability means long-term or permanent disability as determined under the applicable Delta disability plan.

Good reason:

For purposes of Delta’s outstanding equity awards, good reason generally means, in general, the occurrence of any of the following without a person’s written consent: (1) a diminution or other reduction of a person’s authorities, duties or responsibilities, other than an insubstantial and inadvertent act that is promptly remedied by Delta after written notice by the person; (2) the relocation of a person’s office by more than 50 miles and, if the relocation occurs prior to a change in control, the relocation would place the person in a position of reduced status and importance at Delta; (3) a reduction in a person’s base salary or incentive compensation opportunities, other than pursuant to a uniform percentage salary reduction for similarly situated persons (or, following a change in control, all full-time domestic employees who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement); (4) Delta does not keep in effect compensation and benefit programs under which a person receives benefits substantially similar, in the aggregate, to those in effect prior to a reduction (other than a reduction pursuant to an equivalent reduction in such benefits for similarly situated persons (or, following a change in control, all full-time domestic employees who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement)); or (5) a material breach by Delta of any material term of a person’s employment.

For purposes of the Severance Plan, good reason generally means the occurrence of any of the following without a person’s written consent: (1) a diminution or other reduction of a person’s authorities, duties or responsibilities, other than an insubstantial and inadvertent act that is promptly remedied by Delta after written notice by the person; (2) the relocation of a person’s office by more than 50 miles; (3) a material reduction in a person’s base salary or incentive compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION54DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


opportunities, other than pursuant to a uniform percentage salary reduction for all full-time domestic employees who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement; (4) Delta does not keep in effect compensation and benefit programs under which a person receives benefits substantially similar, in the aggregate, to those in effect prior to a reduction (other than a reduction pursuant to an equivalent reduction in such benefits for all full-time domestic employees who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement); or (5) a material breach by Delta of any material term of a person’s employment.

target annual bonus opportunities, other than pursuant to a uniform percentage salary or target annual bonus reduction for similarly situated persons; or (4) a material breach by Delta of any material term of a person’s employment. An event described above constitutes good reason only if a person gives Delta certain written notice of his intent to resign and Delta does not cure the event within a specified period.

Retirement means a termination of employment (1) at or after age 52 with ten years of service completed since a person’s most recent hire date or (2) on or after the date he or she has completed at least 25 years of service since his or her most recent hire date regardless of age. In addition, for purposes of the Retiree Flight Benefits. An described below, Retirement also means a termination of employment by Delta without cause or for any other reason that would entitle the person to benefits under the Severance Plan if the person’s combined age and years of service equal 60 or more.

RETIREE FLIGHT BENEFITS

A named executive officer who retires from Delta at or after age 52 with at least ten yearsunder the definition of service, at or after age 62 with at least five years of service or with at least 25 years of service regardless of age,retirement described above may continue to receive Flight Benefits (see footnote 7(e)7(d) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 37 for a description of Flight Benefits including survivor travel benefits) during retirement, except the unused portion of the two annual allowances will not accumulate into succeeding years (“Retiree(Retiree Flight Benefits”)Benefits).

Notwithstanding the above, a person who is first elected an officer on or after June 8, 2009, will not receive reimbursement for taxes for Retiree Flight Benefits. Delta also does not provide reimbursement for taxes associated with travel by the surviving spouse or domestic partner of any officer.

In exchange for certain non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidentiality covenants for the benefit of Delta and a general release of claims against Delta, an officer who served in that capacity during the period beginning on the date Delta entered into the merger agreement with Northwest Airlines and ending on the date the merger occurred, or who joined Delta from Northwest on the date the merger occurred and who had been a Northwest officer on the date Delta entered into the merger agreement, will receive, on his termination of employment (other than by death or by Delta for cause), a vested right to Retiree Flight Benefits, regardless of the officer’s age and years of service at his termination of employment.

Pre-existing Medical Benefits Agreement With Northwest. In 2001, Northwest Airlines, Inc. entered into an agreement with its then Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Anderson, agreeing to provide Mr. Anderson, his spouse and eligible dependents with medical and dental coverage at the levels then provided to Mr. Anderson under the Northwest medical plans for the life of Mr. Anderson and his spouse. This coverage is secondary to any medical coverage Mr. Anderson receives while he is employed by another company. The agreement with Mr. Anderson was reviewed and approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors of Northwest, and was consistent with Northwest’s then existing practices. As a result of the merger between Delta and Northwest, Delta is required to honor this agreement. The P&C Committee confirmed this obligation in a letter to Mr. Anderson, who has voluntarily waived the benefits under this agreement while he is employed with Delta.

TablesTable Regarding Potential Post-Employment Benefits upon Termination or Change in Control

General. The following tables describetable describes the termination benefits for each named executive officer, assuming termination of employment on December 31, 2015.2019. Also included is a column that describes the benefits, if any, each named executive officer would have received in connection with a change in control.control (CIC). Further, because termination is deemed to occur at the end of the workday on December 31, 2015,2019, the named executive officer would have earned his 20152019 MIP award and the performance award under the 20132017 LTIP, to the extent otherwise payable. Accordingly, these awards are unrelated to the termination of employment.

Retirement. For purposes of the following tables, an executive officer is eligible to retire from Delta (1) at or after age 52 with ten years of service or (2) at or after age 62 with five years of service. On December 31, 2015, only Mr. Bastian and Mr. Hauenstein are eligible to retire under these requirements. The other named executive officers are not eligible to retire under these requirements and, therefore, are not eligible for any retirement-related compensation or benefits.

Broad-based Benefits. We have not included in this section any benefit that is available generally to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis such as payment of retirement, disability and death benefits. See “Defined Benefit Pension Benefits” above, for a discussion of the benefits accrued for eligible named executive officers under the Delta Retirement Plan.

On December 31, 2019, only Mr. Bastian, Mr. Hauenstein and Mr. West were eligible to retire under the definition of retirement described above. The other named executive officers are not eligible to retire under these requirements and, therefore, are not eligible for any retirement-related compensation or benefits.

 

ir.delta.com
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.55EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     44


Certain Assumptions. We used the general assumptions summarized below in calculating the dollar amounts included in the following tables:Back to Contents

Name

Termination Scenario

Severance

Payment

($)(1)

 

Equity ($)

 

Other

Benefits

($)(5)

Performance

Awards(2)

Performance

Stock

Options(3)

Restricted

Stock(4)

Mr. Bastian

Without Cause

5,700,000

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

718,878

Resignation for Good Reason

5,700,000

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

718,878

For Cause

0

 

0

0

0

 

0

Resignation without Good Reason

0

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

688,950

Retirement

0

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

688,950

Death

0

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

0

Disability

0

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

688,950

CIC – Termination without

Cause/Resignation for Good Reason

5,700,000

 

8,160,000

5,151,410

8,967,674

 

718,878

Mr. Hauenstein

Without Cause

3,850,000

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

628,012

Resignation for Good Reason

0

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

608,194

For Cause

0

 

0

0

0

 

0

Resignation without Good Reason

0

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

608,194

Retirement

0

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

608,194

Death

0

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

0

Disability

0

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

608,194

CIC – Termination without

Cause/Resignation for Good Reason

3,850,000

 

4,335,000

2,792,460

4,868,226

 

628,012

Mr. West

Without Cause

3,850,000

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

 

237,683

Resignation for Good Reason

0

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

186,501

For Cause

0

 

0

0

0

 

0

Resignation without Good Reason

0

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

 

186,501

Retirement

0

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

 

186,501

Death

0

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

 

5,297

Disability

0

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

 

186,501

CIC – Termination without

Cause/Resignation for Good Reason

3,850,000

 

4,335,000

2,665,065

4,853,372

 

237,683

Mr. Jacobson

Without Cause

2,062,500

 

1,520,000

910,414

2,428,224

 

511,869

Resignation for Good Reason

0

 

1,520,000

910,414

2,428,224

 

472,550

For Cause

0

 

0

0

0

 

0

Resignation without Good Reason

0

 

0

0

0

472,550

Death

0

 

3,040,000

1,318,314

3,424,764

 

12,599

Disability

0

 

3,040,000

1,318,314

3,424,764

 

472,550

CIC – Termination without

Cause/Resignation for Good Reason

2,062,500

 

3,040,000

1,318,314

3,424,764

 

511,869

Mr. Carter

Without Cause

1,856,250

 

1,000,667

606,207

1,621,367

 

39,636

Resignation for Good Reason

0

 

1,000,667

606,207

1,621,367

 

0

For Cause

0

 

0

0

0

 

0

Resignation without Good Reason

0

 

0

0

0

 

0

Death

0

 

2,033,000

886,483

2,551,248

 

0

Disability

0

 

2,033,000

886,483

2,551,248

 

0

CIC – Termination without

Cause/Resignation for Good Reason

1,856,250

 

2,033,000

886,483

2,551,248

 

39,636

(1)

The severance payment, if applicable, represents the following for each named executive officer: (i) Mr. Bastian: 24 months of base salary and 200% of his MIP target award, which is 200% of his base salary; (ii) Mr. Hauenstein: 24 months of base salary and 200% of his MIP target award, which is 175% of his base salary; (iii) Mr. West: 24 months of base salary and 200% of his MIP target award, which is 175% of his base salary; (iv) Mr. Jacobson: 18 months of base salary and 150% of his MIP target award, which is 150% of his base salary; and (v) Mr. Carter: 18 months of base salary and 150% of his MIP target award, which is 125% of his base salary.

(2)

The value of the performance awards in the tables is based on payment at the target level.

 

 

Performance Awards. The value of the performance awards (except with respect to the portion of the award attributable to return on invested capital) in the tables is based on payment at the target level. As actual performance for the 2014 and 2015 ROIC Installments under the 2014 LTIP and the 2015 ROIC Installment under the 2015 LTIP each exceeded the maximum performance measure of 14%, these ROIC Installments are considered Earned Awards and the value of such Earned Awards in the tables are based on payment at the maximum level.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     45


Back to Contents

(3)

Performance Stock OptionsWe used intrinsic value for the performance stock options in the following tables assuming that the performance criteria attributable to the stock options under the 2013, 20142017, 2018 and 20152019 LTIPs were met. The exercise price for ourthe unexercisable stock options outstanding on December 31, 20152019 was (1) $14.86$49.33 for the options granted on February 7, 2013; (2) $30.899, 2017; (3) $51.23 for the options granted on February 8, 2018.; and (3) $50.52 for the options granted on February 6, 2014; and (3) $46.14 for the options granted on February 5, 2015.2019.

(4)

Restricted StockAs required by SEC rules, the values in these tables for restricted stock are based on the $50.69$58.48 closing price of Delta common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2015.2019.

(5)

Benefits. Under our severance arrangements or following retirement, our officers may receive reimbursement of financial planningOther benefits include company-paid healthcare coverage, outplacement services until the end of the year in which their employment terminated. For purposes of the tables, we have assumedand, except for Mr. Carter, Retiree Flight Benefits. The Retiree Flight Benefits reflected for each named executive officer would usewere determined by using the following assumptions for each officer: (1) Flight Benefits continue for the life expectancy of the officer or the joint life expectancy of the officer and his remaining available 2015 allowance. The maximum amount available underspouse, measured using a mortality table that calculates the programaverage life expectancy to be 27.4 years; (2) the level of usage of Retiree Flight Benefits for executive vice presidentseach year is the same as the officer’s and more senior executiveshis spouse’s actual usage of Flight Benefits during 2019; (3) the incremental cost to Delta of Retiree Flight Benefits for each year is $15,000 per year. In 2016,the same as the actual incremental cost incurred by Delta for the officer’s Flight Benefits in 2019; and (4) the value of Retiree Flight Benefits includes a tax gross up equal to 60% of the lesser of (i) the officer’s actual usage of Flight Benefits in 2018 and (ii) the annual tax reimbursement of financial planning services was eliminated for all officers and will no longer be available under our severance arrangements or following retirement.

The Retiree Flight Benefits reflected for each named executive officer in the following tables were determined by using the following assumptions for each officer: (1) Flight Benefits continue for the life expectancy of the officer or the joint life expectancy of the officer and his spouse or domestic partner, measured using a mortality table projected to 2022; (2) the level of usage of Retiree Flight Benefits for each year is the same as the officer’s and his spouse’s or domestic partner’s actual usage of Flight Benefits during 2015; (3) the incremental cost to Delta of Retiree Flight Benefits for each year is the same as the actual incremental cost incurred by Delta for the officer’s Flight Benefits in 2015; and (4) the value of Retiree Flight Benefits includes a tax gross up equal to 60% of the lesser of (i) the officer’s actual usage of Flight Benefits in 2015 and (ii) the annual tax reimbursement allowance (as described in footnote 7(e)allowance (as described in footnote 7(d) to the Summary Compensation Table) (surviving spouses and domestic partners do not receive reimbursement for taxes associated with Retiree Flight Benefits). On the basis of these assumptions, we determined the value of Retiree Flight Benefits for each named executive officer by calculating the present value of the benefit over the officer’s life expectancy (or joint life expectancy with his spouse or domestic partner) using a discount rate of 4.13%.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION56DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Richard H. Anderson

  Termination not Involving a Change in Control  Change in Control 
  Termination
without
Cause
($)
  Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Termination
for Cause
($)
  Resignation
Without
Good
Reason
($)
  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
  Termination
Without
Cause or
Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Employment
Continues
($)
 

Severance Payment (1):

  4,800,000    4,800,000    0    0    0    0    4,800,000    0  

Equity:

        

Performance Awards

  9,739,122    9,739,122    0    9,739,122    9,739,122    9,739,122    9,739,122    0  

Performance Stock Options

  7,121,202    7,121,202    0    7,121,202    7,121,202    7,121,202    7,121,202    0  

Restricted Stock

  13,430,265    13,430,265    0    13,430,265    13,430,265    13,430,265    13,430,265    0  

Benefits and Perquisites:

        

Company-Paid COBRA Coverage (2)

  301,000    301,000    301,000    301,000    146,400    301,000    301,000    0  

Career Transition Services

  5,000    5,000    0    0    0    0    5,000    0  

Financial Planning

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0  

Retiree Flight Benefits

  716,979    716,979    0    716,979    19,192    716,979    716,979    0  

(1)The severance payment, if applicable, represents 24 months of base salary and 200% of Mr. Anderson’s MIP target award (which is 200% of his base salary).

(2)This amount represents the present value of medical and dental coverage at the levels provided under Northwest’s plans for Mr. Anderson andbenefit over the officer’s life expectancy (or joint life expectancy with his spouse for their lives, as described above under “Other Benefits – Pre-existing Medical Benefits Agreement With Northwest.”spouse) using a discount rate of 4.33%.

Edward H. BastianCEO Pay Ratio

Under rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are required to calculate and disclose the total compensation paid to our median employee as well as the ratio of the pay of our Chief Executive Officer to the median employee. For 2019:

  Termination not Involving a Change in Control  Change in Control 
  Termination
without
Cause
($)
  Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Termination
for Cause
($)
  Resignation
Without
Good
Reason
($)
  Retirement
($)
  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
  Termination
Without
Cause or
Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Employment
Continues
($)
 

Severance Payment (1):

  3,437,500    3,437,500    0    0    0    0    0    3,437,500    0  

Equity:

         

Performance Awards

  4,499,980    4,499,980    0    4,499,980    4,499,980    4,499,980    4,499,980    4,499,980    0  

Performance Stock Options

  3,650,455    3,650,455    0    3,650,455    3,650,455    3,650,455    3,650,455    3,650,455    0  

Restricted Stock

  6,375,383    6,375,383    0    6,375,383    6,375,383    6,375,383    6,375,383    6,375,383    0  

Benefits and Perquisites:

         

Company-Paid COBRA Coverage

  34,354    34,354    0    0    0    0    0    34,354    0  

Career Transition Services

  5,000    5,000    0    0    0    0    0    5,000    0  

Financial Planning

  15,000    15,000    0    0    15,000    0    0    15,000    0  

Retiree Flight Benefits

  812,649    812,649    0    812,649    812,649    28,786    812,649    812,649    0  

the annual total compensation of the employee identified at median of all our employees other than our Chief Executive Officer was $118,198;

the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Ed Bastian, was $17,325,379; and

the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the total annual compensation of all our employees was estimated to be 147 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records, using the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported here, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

As permitted by SEC rules, our median employee for 2019 is the same employee identified in 2018 because we determined that there have been no changes in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements during 2019 that would significantly impact this pay ratio disclosure.

In identifying the median of the annual total compensation of our employees, we used the following methodology and material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates as of December 31, 2018:

Because less than 5% of our employees reside in other countries, we excluded all 2,992 of our international employees using the de minimis exemption permitted under SEC rules.(1)

After applying the de minimis exemption, we had 96,072 U.S. employees, including the employees of all of our subsidiaries and all part-time, seasonal, temporary and ready reserve employees.

To identify the median employee, we utilized information from Box 5 of Form W-2 as we believe this measure reflects the most comparable measure of compensation across our diverse workgroups.

In reviewing this information, we annualized the compensation of permanent full-time and part-time employees who were hired in 2018 and remained employed as of December 31, 2018.

After identifying the median employee, we calculated the annual total compensation for our median employee using the rules used when calculating our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table, as required. Because the SEC’s rules require us to include the value of certain benefits we provide in the Summary Compensation Table calculation, the compensation reported for the median employee is higher than the compensation reported in Box 5 of the employee’s W-2.


(1)

The non U.S. countries and the number of employees in each of those countries is as follows: Argentina – 11; Aruba – 3; Australia – 5; Bahamas – 4; Belgium – 17; Belize – 1; Bermuda – 13; Brazil – 189; Canada – 358; Cayman Islands – 2; Chile – 35; China – 107; Colombia – 10; Costa Rica – 43; Czech Republic – 2; Denmark – 1; Dominican Republic – 18; Ecuador – 7; El Salvador – 10; France – 84; Germany – 42; Ghana – 3; Greece – 4; Grenada – 1; Guatemala – 29; Honduras – 6; Hong Kong – 4; Hungary – 1; India – 3; Ireland – 19; Israel – 4; Italy – 46; Jamaica – 7; Japan – 572; Korea – 31; Mexico – 372; Netherlands Antilles – 1; Nicaragua – 19; Nigeria – 8; Panama – 10; Peru – 22; Philippines – 59; Portugal – 1; Puerto Rico – 108; Russia – 1; Senegal – 2; Singapore – 491; South Africa – 3; Spain – 36; St. Lucia – 2; Switzerland – 2; The Netherlands – 80; Turks and Caicos – 1; UAE – 1; United Kingdom – 79; US Virgin Islands – 2

 

(1)ir.delta.comThe severance payment, if applicable, represents 24 months of base salary and 200% of Mr. Bastian’s MIP target award (which is 175% of his base salary).

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     46


Back to Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.57EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


GlenNon-employee director compensation is approved by the Board of Directors, based on recommendations of the Corporate Governance Committee. In 2019, the Committee engaged outside compensation consultant Frederic W. Hauenstein

  Termination not Involving a Change in Control  Change in Control 
  Termination
without
Cause
($)
  Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Termination
for Cause
($)
  Resignation
Without
Good
Reason
($)
  Retirement
($)
  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
  Termination
Without
Cause or
Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Employment
Continues
($)
 

Severance Payment (1):

  2,118,750    0    0    0    0    0    0    2,118,750    0  

Equity:

         

Performance Awards

  4,614,564    4,614,564    0    4,614,564    4,614,564    4,614,564    4,614,564    4,614,564    0  

Restricted Stock

  5,746,675    5,746,675    0    5,746,675    5,746,675    5,746,675    5,746,675    5,746,675    0  

Benefits and Perquisites:

         

Company-Paid COBRA Coverage

  8,690    0    0    0    0    0    0    8,690    0  

Career Transition Services

  5,000    0    0    0    0    0    0    5,000    0  

Financial Planning

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0  

Retiree Flight Benefits

  540,909    540,909    0    540,909    540,909    0    540,909    540,909    0  

(1)The severance payment, if applicable, represents 18 months of base salary and 150% of Mr. Hauenstein’s MIP target award (which is 150% of his base salary).

Paul A. Jacobson

  Termination not Involving a Change in Control  Change in Control 
  Termination
without
Cause
($)
  Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Termination
for Cause
($)
  Resignation
Without
Good
Reason
($)
  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
  Termination
Without
Cause or
Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Employment
Continues
($)
 

Severance Payment (1):

  1,968,750    0    0    0    0    0    1,968,750    0  

Equity:

        

Performance Awards

  1,802,055    1,802,055    0    0    3,410,403    3,410,403    3,410,403    0  

Restricted Stock

  3,229,206    3,229,206    0    0    4,396,851    4,396,851    4,396,851    0  

Benefits and Perquisites:

        

Company-Paid COBRA Coverage

  24,756    0    0    0    0    0    24,756    0  

Career Transition Services

  5,000    0    0    0    0    0    5,000    0  

Financial Planning

  7,473    0    0    0    0    0    7,473    0  

Retiree Flight Benefits

  576,042    576,042    0    576,042    7,335    576,042    576,042    0  

(1)The severance payment, if applicable, represents 18 months of base salary and 150% of Mr. Jacobson’s MIP target award (which is 150% of his base salary).

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION58DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


W. Gil West

  Termination not Involving a Change in Control  Change in Control 
  Termination
without
Cause
($)
  Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Termination
for Cause
($)
  Resignation
Without
Good
Reason
($)
  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
  Termination
Without
Cause or
Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
  Employment
Continues
($)
 

Severance Payment (1):

  2,025,000    0    0    0    0    0    2,025,000    0  

Equity:

        

Performance Awards

  3,093,727    3,093,727    0    2,031,244    3,518,736    3,518,736    3,518,736    0  

Restricted Stock

  4,196,777    4,196,777    0    2,060,042    4,506,848    4,506,848    4,506,848    0  

Benefits and Perquisites:

        

Company-Paid COBRA Coverage

  28,445    0    0    0    0    0    28,445    0  

Career Transition Services

  5,000    0    0    0    0    0    5,000    0  

Financial Planning

  10,716    0    0    0    0    0    10,716    0  

Retiree Flight Benefits

  296,744    296,744    0    296,744    20,969    296,744    296,744    0  

(1)The severance payment, if applicable, represents 18 months of base salary and 150% of Mr. West’s MIP target award (which is 150% of his base salary).

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.59EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONCook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook) to assist the Committee in a competitive assessment of the compensation program for outside directors. FW Cook reviewed our director compensation against the same 21 companies (including three airlines) in the peer group used for executive compensation purposes by our Personnel & Compensation Committee. FW Cook recommended no increase over the level set in 2017 for compensation of the Board and the non-executive Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors accepted the recommendation, and no change in Board compensation was made in 2019. The Performance Compensation Plan limits equity awards to non-employee directors to $1 million. Employee directors continued to receive no additional pay for Board service.

Non-employee directors receive the following for their service on the Board of Directors:

 

Annual Board Retainer:

$90,000100,000 (payable in quarterly installments)

Annual Board/New Board Member Equity Grant:

$160,000175,000 in restricted stock that vests at or shortly before the next annual meeting of stockholders,shareholders, subject to the director’s continued service on the Board of Directors on the vesting date. Dividends accrue on these awards and are paid upon vesting of the restricted stock and restricted stock units.stock.

Annual Committee Chair Cash Retainer:

$20,000, except $25,000 for Audit Committee Chair.

Annual Committee MemberNon-executive Chairman of the
Board Equity Retainer:

$10,000130,000 in restricted stock with the same vesting schedule as the annual Board equity grant.

Annual Lead Director Retainer:

$30,000

Expense Reimbursements:

Reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetingsmeetings.

Matching Gifts for Education Program:

Directors (and all employees and retirees) are eligible to participate in a program under which The Delta Air Lines Foundation matches 100% of contributions to eligible public and private, accredited, non-profit, educational institutions, pre-kindergarten through post-graduate, up to a $5,000 cap per individual director (and employee or retiree) per calendar year. In March 2020, the Matching Gifts for Education Program was indefinitely suspended.

InrecognitionoftheunprecedentedchallengesfacingDeltain2020asaresultoftheCOVID-19pandemic,thenon-employeedirectormembersare forgoing theircashretainersforsixmonthsbeginningApril1,2020.

As is common in the airline industry, Delta provides complimentary travel and certain Delta Sky Club® privileges for members of the Board of Directors; the director’s spouse, domestic partner or designated companion; the director’s children and parents; and, to a limited extent, other persons designated by the director (“Director(Director Flight Benefits”)Benefits). Complimentary travel for such other persons is limited to an aggregate imputed value of $20,000 per year. Delta reimburses the director for associated taxes on complimentary travel with an imputed tax value of up to $25,000 per year. Unused portions of the annual allowances described in the previous two sentences accumulate and may be carried into succeeding years during Board service. Complimentary travel is provided to an eligible director’s surviving spouse or domestic partner after the eligible director’s death. Delta will not reimburse the surviving spouse or domestic partner for associated taxes on complimentary travel under the survivor travel benefit.

A director who retires from the Board at or after age 52 with at least ten years of service as a director, at or after age 68 with at least five years of service as a director, or at his or her mandatory retirement date, may continue to receive Director Flight Benefits during retirement, except the unused portion of the annual allowances does not accumulate into succeeding years (“Retired(Retired Director Flight Benefits”)Benefits). A director who served on the Board of Directors during the period beginning on the date Delta entered into the merger agreement with Northwest and ending on the date the merger occurred, or who joined the Board at the closing of the merger on October 29, 2008, will receive, at the completion of his or her Board service (other than due to death or due to removal by stockholdersshareholders for cause), a vested right to receive Retired Director Flight Benefits, regardless of the director’s age and years of service when his or her Board service ends. A director is not eligible to receive Retired Director Flight Benefits if the director engages in certain wrongful acts.

Notwithstanding the above, a person who is first elected to the Board of Directors on or after June 8, 2009, will not receive reimbursement for taxes for Retired Director Flight Benefits. Directors and retired directors may also purchase private jet flights from a Delta subsidiary by paying the incremental cost of the flights. Mr. RalphHazleton is not eligible to receive flight benefits. In his rolebenefits other than those received as Executive Chairman of the Board, effective May 2, 2016, Mr. Anderson remains a Delta employee.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     47


Back to Contents

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to non-employee members of Delta’s Board of Directors who are employees of Delta are not separately compensated for their service as directors.2019.

Name(1)

Fees

Earned

or Paid in

Cash

($)

Stock

Awards(2)

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

All Other

Compensation(3)

($)

 

Total

($)

Francis S. Blake

120,000

305,000

0

0

0

31,714

 

456,714

Daniel A. Carp

120,000

175,000

0

0

0

29,289

 

324,289

Ashton B. Carter

100,000

175,000

0

0

0

17,732

 

292,732

David G. DeWalt

120,000

175,000

0

0

0

22,572

 

317,572

William H. Easter III

125,000

175,000

0

0

0

304

 

300,304

Michael P. Huerta

100,000

175,000

0

0

0

9,861

 

284,861

Jeanne P. Jackson

100,000

175,000

0

0

0

33,794

 

308,794

George N. Mattson

120,000

175,000

0

0

0

124,931

 

419,931

Sergio A. L. Rial

100,000

175,000

0

0

0

9,557

 

304,557

David S. Taylor

41,667

175,000

0

0

0

2,657

 

219,334

Kathy N. Waller

100,000

175,000

0

0

0

13,276

 

288,276

(1) 

As Delta employees, Mr. Bastian and Mr. Hazelton were not separately compensated for their service on the Board of Directors in 2019. Mr. Bastian’s compensation is included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 36. Mr. Hazelton’s compensation is described in “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” on page 49.

(2)

On June 20, 2019, the Board of Directors granted 3,130 shares of restricted stock to each non-employee director at that date. This award vests on June 18, 2020, subject to continued Board service on that date. Mr. Blake received an additional grant of 2,960 shares as compensation for service as non-executive Chairman of the Board, subject to vesting on the same schedule as described above. Mr. Taylor was elected to the Board in August 2019 and received a grant of 2,960 shares of restricted stock in connection with joining the Board. The “Stock Awards” column shows the fair value of the restricted stock granted to each non-employee director in 2019 as determined under FASB ASC Topic 718, based on date of the grant.

(3)

The amounts in this column for each non-employee director represent reimbursement of taxes associated with Director Flight Benefits. The amount for Mr. Blake represents the incremental cost of Director Flight Benefits of $10,716 and reimbursement of taxes associated with this benefit of $20,998. The amount for Mr. Carp represents the incremental cost of Director Flight Benefits of $12,161 and reimbursement of taxes associated with this benefit of $17,128. The amount for Ms. Jackson represents the incremental cost of Director Flight Benefits of $17,197 and reimbursement of taxes associated with this benefit of $16,597. The amount for Mr. Mattson includes $14,606 in reimbursement of taxes associated with Director Flight Benefits, $10,325 in Director Flights Benefits and $100,000 in annual compensation for acting on Delta’s behalf as director of Air France-KLM Group. No other non-employee director received perquisites or other personal benefits with a total incremental cost of $10,000 or more, the threshold for reporting under SEC rules. From time to time, directors attend events sponsored by Delta at no incremental cost to Delta.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The non-employee director stock ownership guidelines require each non-employee director to own shares of Delta common stock equal to or greater than (1) shares with a value of five times the annual Board cash retainer paid to the director or (2) 35,000 shares. Non-employee directors must achieve this ownership level within five years after initial election to the Board. For this purpose, stock ownership includes restricted stock and restricted stock units; shares owned directly or by a spouse or dependent children; shares held in trust by or for the director or an immediate family member who resides in the same household as the director (an “immediateimmediate family member”)member); or shares owned by an entity wholly-owned by the director or an immediate family member. It does not include shares a director has the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION60DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


In addition, each non-employee director must hold at least 50% of all “net shares” received through restricted stock vesting or realized through stock option exercises until the stock ownership guidelines are achieved. For this purpose, “net shares” means all shares retained after any applicable withholding of any shares for tax purposes.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, all non-employee directors exceeded the required stock ownership level except three directors, all of whom wereone director, who was first elected in 2014 or 2015.2019. Each director has five years from the date of his or her election to achieve the required ownership level under the non-employee director stock ownership guidelines.

DirectorThe non-employee directors are also subject to the company’s prohibition against the hedging and pledging of Delta securities as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the proxy statement under “Executive Compensation TablePolicies — Anti-Hedging and Anti Pledging Policy” on page 33.

The following table sets forth

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     48


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

We are seeking your support for the compensation paidelection of 12 director nominees who the Board, acting on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated to non-employee members of Delta’sserve on the Board of Directors for 2015:a one-year term.

All Delta directors are elected annually. At the annual meeting, each director will be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast. This means the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director (excluding abstentions). Each director elected will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the election of his or her successor. See page 69 for more information about voting at the annual meeting.

Delta’s Bylaws provide that any director not receiving a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting must offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors whether to accept the resignation. The Board will consider the recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days after the certification of the election results.

2020 Nominees for Director

After considering the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Board set the number of directors at 12 as of the date of the annual meeting and nominated all current directors to stand for re-election except Daniel A. Carp, who is retiring from the Board.

The Board believes that each of the nominees is qualified to serve as a director and will be able to stand for election. If not, the Board may name a substitute nominee or reduce the number of directors. If a substitute is named, the proxies will vote for the substitute nominee. In addition to the specific skills and experience for each nominee listed in the chart on the prior page, qualifications of each nominee that were considered by the Board follow each nominee’s biographical description on the following pages.

ALPA Nominee

Delta, the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), the collective bargaining representative for Delta pilots, and the Delta Master Executive Council, the governing body of the Delta unit of ALPA (Delta MEC), have an agreement whereby Delta agrees (1) to cause the election to the Board of Directors of a Delta pilot designated by the Delta MEC who is not a member or officer of the Delta MEC or an officer of ALPA (Pilot Nominee); (2) at any meeting of shareholders at which the Pilot Nominee is subject to election, to re-nominate the Pilot Nominee or nominate another qualified Delta pilot designated by the Delta MEC to be elected to the Board of Directors and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause such person to be elected to the Board; and (3) in the event of the Pilot Nominee’s death, disability, resignation, removal or failure to be elected, to elect promptly to the Board a replacement Pilot Nominee designated by the Delta MEC to fill the resulting vacancy.

Pursuant to this provision, the Delta MEC has designated Christopher A. Hazleton to be nominated for election to the Board at the annual meeting.

The compensation of Mr. Hazleton as a Delta pilot is determined under the collective bargaining agreement between Delta and ALPA. During 2019, Mr. Hazleton received $424,178 in compensation (which includes: $324,368 in flight earnings, $41,303 in shared rewards/profit sharing payments and $58,507 in Delta contributions related to a defined contribution plan). As a Delta pilot representative on the Board, Mr. Hazleton is not separately compensated for his service as a director.

TheBoardbelievesthatthecombinationofbackgrounds,skillsandexperiencesofthenomineesproducesaBoardthatiswell-equippedtoexerciseoversightresponsibilitiesonbehalfofourshareholdersandotherstakeholders.Inadditiontothechartonthefollowingpage,weprovideinformationabouteachnomineefordirector,includingthespecificexperiencethatledtheBoardtoconcludethenomineeshouldserveasadirectorofDelta.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     49


Back to Contents

Skills and Experiences of Independent Directors

The following chart shows the specific skills and experiences the Board currently believes are important for independent nominees collectively to possess for effective governance of Delta in the current business environment. The matrix also provides a high level summary of the important skills and experiences of our independent nominees to the Board, which contribute to the sound governance of Delta. It is not an exhaustive list of each nominee’s contributions to the Board.

Senior Leadership

CEO/senior management of public or private company/governmental entity/academic

Airline/Transportation Industry

Business leader, or regulator or consultant to the industry

Marketing/Brand Management/Data as Customer Engagement Tool

Marketing/managing well-known brands including the use of data analytics

Finance/Accounting

Capital markets, public company, financial or accounting management experience

Risk Management

Enterprise or financial risk management

Technology/Cybersecurity/Digital

Leadership in technology, cybersecurity, new media or data Analytics

Energy

Senior experience in the oil industry

Global Business

Senior experience in multinational businesses

Government Affairs/Legal Affairs/Global Security

Senior experience in public sector/law/global security

Board Membership

Director public/large private company

 

Name(1)

 Fees Earned
or  Paid in
Cash ($)
  Stock
Awards(2)
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation
($)
  Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
  Total
($)
 

Francis S. Blake

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    47,020    317,020  

Roy J. Bostock

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    35,795    305,795  

John S. Brinzo

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    11,926    281,926  

Daniel A. Carp(4)

  295,000    210,000    0    0    0    13,600    518,600  

David G. DeWalt

  120,000    160,000    0    0    0    12,058    292,058  

Thomas E. Donilon

  110,000    320,000    0    0    0    2,498    432,498  

William H. Easter III

  115,000    160,000    0    0    0    1,700    276,700  

Mickey P. Foret

  115,000    160,000    0    0    0    29,384    304,384  

Shirley C. Franklin

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    16,763    286,763  

David R. Goode

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    10,256    280,256  

George N. Mattson

  120,000    160,000    0    0    0    13,157    293,157  

Paula Rosput Reynolds(5)

  60,000    0    0    0    0    6,114    66,114  

Sergio A.L. Rial

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    493    270,493  

Kathy N. Waller

  55,000    160,000    0    0    0    692    215,692  

Kenneth B. Woodrow

  110,000    160,000    0    0    0    7,217    277,217  
ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     50


Back to Contents

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:

EDWARD H. BASTIAN 

Age: 62

Joined Delta’s Board:

February5,2010

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Bastian is the Chief Executive Officer of Delta. Previously, he served as President of Delta from 2007 to May 2016 and President of Delta. Mr. Bastian was also Chief Financial Officer of Delta from 2007 to 2008; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Delta from 2005 to 2007; Chief Financial Officer of Acuity Brands from June 2005 to July 2005; Senior Vice President — Finance and Controller of Delta from 2000 to 2005 and Vice President and Controller of Delta from 1998 to 2000.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Bastian has over twenty years of experience as a Delta officer, including serving as Delta’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer during its Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. Mr. Bastian’s accounting and finance background also provides financial and strategic expertise to the Board of Directors.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Grupo Aeroméxico, S.A.B. de C.V.

GOL Linhas Aereas Inteligentes, S.A. (2012-2016)

Member, Board of Woodruff Arts Center

Member, Council on Foreign Relations

FRANCIS S. BLAKE

Age: 70

Joined Delta’s Board:

July25,2014

Committees:
Audit;Corporate
Governance(Chair);
Personnel
&
Compensation

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Blake is the non-executive Chairman of Delta’s Board of Directors and previously served as the lead director of Delta’s Board from May 2016 to October 2016. He served as the Chairman of The Home Depot from 2007 until his retirement in February 2015. He was the Chief Executive Officer of The Home Depot from 2007 to November 2014 and previously served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and its Executive Vice President. Mr. Blake joined The Home Depot in 2002 as Executive Vice President — Business Development and Corporate Operations. He was previously the deputy secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy and served in a variety of executive positions at General Electric Company, including as Senior Vice President, Corporate Business Development in charge of all worldwide mergers, acquisitions and dispositions.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Blake has extensive experience as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a complex retail organization and prior leadership positions in business and government. He has also served on boards of directors of public companies in the energy industry. At other public companies, Mr. Blake has experience as a member of the audit, compensation and governance committees.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Macy’s, Inc.

The Procter & Gamble Company

Member, Board of Georgia Aquarium

Member, Board of Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation

Member, Board of Agnes Scott College

ASHTON B. CARTER

Age: 65

Joined Delta’s Board:
October23,2017

Committees:
Audit;Safety&
Security

BIOGRAPHY:

Secretary Carter is Director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard Kennedy School and an Innovation Fellow at MIT. Secretary Carter served as U.S. Secretary of Defense from 2015 to 2017. He served as Senior Executive at the Markle Foundation and a Fellow at Stanford University from 2014 to 2015. In prior service in the Department of Defense, Secretary Carter served as Deputy Secretary of Defense from 2011 to 2013, functioning as the department’s chief operating officer, and as Undersecretary of Defense of Acquisition, Technology and Logistics from 2009 to 2011. Secretary Carter served as the Chair of the International and Global Affairs Faculty and Professor of Science at Harvard from 2000 to 2009.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Secretary Carter has substantial experience in government and security matters, having served directly and indirectly under 11 Secretaries of Defense in both Democratic and Republican administrations. As Secretary of Defense, Secretary Carter managed a complex and diverse organization.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

General Electric Company (if elected in May 2020)

Board Member, Council on Foreign Relations

Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences

International Institute for Strategic Studies

National Committee on U.S.-China Relations

 

 

(1)

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     51


Back to Contents

DAVID G. DEWALT

Age: 56

Joined Delta’s Board:
November22,2011

Committees:
Audit;Safety&
Security(Chair)

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. DeWalt most recently served as the Executive Chairman of FireEye, Inc., a global network cyber security company. He served as FireEye’s Chief Executive Officer from November 2012 to June 2016 and Chairman of the Board from June 2012 to January 2017. Mr. DeWalt was President and Chief Executive Officer of McAfee, Inc., a security technology company, from 2007 until 2011 when McAfee, Inc. was acquired by Intel Corporation. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. DeWalt held executive positions with EMC Corporation, a provider of information infrastructure technology and solutions, including serving as Executive Vice President and President-Customer Operations and Content Management Software.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. DeWalt has substantial expertise in the information technology security industry and has strategic and operational experience as the former Chief Executive Officer of FireEye, Inc. and former Chief Executive Officer of McAfee, Inc. Mr. DeWalt has served on the audit, compensation and governance committees of the boards of other public companies.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Five9, Inc.

Forescout Technologies, Inc.

FireEye, Inc. (2012-2017)

Member, National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee

WILLIAM H. EASTER III

Age: 70

Joined Delta’s Board:
December3,2012

Committees:
Audit(Chair);
Corporate

Governance;
Safety
&
Security

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Easter was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of DCP Midstream, LLC (formerly Duke Energy Field Services, LLC) from 2004 until his retirement in 2008. Previously employed by ConocoPhillips for 32 years, Mr. Easter served as Vice President of State Government Affairs from 2002 to 2004 and as General Manager of the Gulf Coast Refining, Marketing and Transportation Business Unit from 1998 to 2002.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Easter has over 36 years of leadership and operational experience in natural gas, crude oil and refined product supply, transportation, refining and marketing with ConocoPhillips and DCP Midstream LLC. Additionally, Mr. Easter has experience as a member of the boards of directors of other public companies where he served on the audit, corporate governance, compensation and finance committees. Since his retirement from DCP Midstream, LLC, Mr. Easter has been involved in private investments.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Concho Resources, Inc.

Grupo Aeroméxico, S.A.B. de C.V.

BakerHughes, Inc. (2014-2017)

Member, Board of Memorial Hermann Health System, Houston, Texas

CHRISTOPHER A. HAZLETON

Age: 52

Joined Delta’s Board:
June
20,2019

Committee:

Safety&Security

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Hazleton is a Delta pilot and currently a Captain flying the Airbus 321 aircraft. Mr. Hazleton was a Northwest Airlines pilot from 1999 until he became a Delta pilot upon Northwest’s merger with Delta. He was nominated by the Delta MEC as the Pilot Nominee. He also previously served as the Chairman of the Delta MEC Strategic Planning Committee.

QUALIFICATIONS:

As a pilot designated by the Delta employees, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Bastian, Mr. Ralph and Mr. Rogers were not separately compensated for their serviceMEC to serve on the Board of Directors, Mr. Hazleton provides a unique perspective into the operations of the airline industry and related labor relations matters.



ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     52


Back to Contents

MICHAEL P. HUERTA

Age: 63

Joined Delta’s Board:
April20,2018

Committees:
Audit;Safety&
Security

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Huerta completed a five-year term as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2015.January 2018. Before being named as Administrator, Mr. Anderson’sHuerta served as Acting Administrator of the FAA from 2011 to 2013 and FAA Deputy Administrator from 2010 to 2011. Mr. Bastian’s compensation is includedHuerta served as Executive Vice President and Group President of the Transportation Solutions Group at Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (now Conduent) from 2008 to 2009 and Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Transportation Solutions of ACS Government Solutions from 2002 to 2008. Mr. Huerta currently serves as a transportation industry consultant, including acting as a Senior Advisor to Macquarie Capital.

QUALIFICATIONS:

As head of the FAA, Mr. Huerta led a complex organization responsible for the safety and efficiency of civil aviation in the Summary Compensation TableU.S. Throughout his career, he has held key transportation industry roles in both the public and private sectors.

AFFILIATIONS:

Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society

JEANNE P. JACKSON

Age: 68

Joined Delta’s Board:
January25,2017

Committees:
Finance; Personnel &
Compensation

BIOGRAPHY:

Ms. Jackson retired as senior strategic advisor to the chief executive officer of NIKE, Inc. effective August 2017. She served as NIKE’s President, Product and Merchandising from July 2013 until April 2016 and President, Direct to Consumer from 2009 until July 2013. Ms. Jackson joined the NIKE Executive team in 2009 after serving on its Board of Directors for eight years. She founded and served as the Chief Executive Officer of MSP Capital, a private investment company from 2002 to 2009, and has resumed the role since retiring from NIKE. Ms. Jackson served as Chief Executive Officer of Walmart.com, a private e-commerce enterprise, from 2000 to 2002. Ms. Jackson previously served in various leadership positions at Gap Inc., Victoria’s Secret, Saks Fifth Avenue and Federated Department Stores, Inc., all clothing retailers, and Walt Disney Attractions, Inc., the theme parks and vacation resorts division of The Walt Disney Company.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Ms. Jackson has extensive experience as a senior executive for several major consumer retailers, with expertise in consumer product and direct to consumer marketing. She has also served on boards of directors of public companies in the consumer product industry where she has served on audit, compensation, corporate governance and finance committees.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Monster Beverage Corporation

The Kraft Heinz Company

McDonald’s Corporation (1999–2019)

U. S. Ski & Snowboard Association

GEORGE N. MATTSON

Age: 54

Joined Delta’s Board:
October1,2012

Committees:
Corporate
Governance; Finance
(Chair); Personnel &
Compensation

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Mattson served as a partner and co-head of the Global Industrials Group in Investment Banking at Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 2002 through August 2012, where he served in a variety of positions from 1994 to 2002. Since his retirement from Goldman Sachs, Mr. Mattson has been a private investor involved in acquiring and growing middle market businesses.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Mattson has experience in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and capital markets. In addition, Mr. Mattson has knowledge of the airline industry and other global industries from his 18 years at Goldman, Sachs & Co., including as co-head of the Global Industrials Group in Investment Banking, which had responsibility for a diverse set of industry sectors, including companies in the transportation industry.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Air France-KLM Group

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.

Chair, Board of Visitors of the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University

Advisory Board, Star Mountain Capital

Advisory Board, Comvest Partners

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     53


Back to Contents

SERGIO A. L. RIAL

Age: 59

Joined Delta’s Board:
December9,2014

Committees:
Finance;Personnel&
Compensation
(expected to become
Chair upon Mr.
Carp’s retirement)

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Rial has been Chief Executive Officer since January 2016 of Banco Santander Brazil, a member of Santander Group. Mr. Rial served as Chairman of Banco Santander Brazil from February 2015 until January 2016. From 2012 to February 2015, Mr. Rial was Chief Executive Officer of Marfrig Global Foods, one of the world’s largest meat companies with operations in Brazil and 15 other countries. Prior to joining Marfrig in 2012, Mr. Rial served in various leadership capacities with Cargill, Inc., a Minneapolis-based global provider of food, agriculture, financial and industrial products and services. At Cargill, Mr. Rial served as Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2011 and Executive Vice President from 2011 to 2012. He was also a member of Cargill’s board of directors from 2010 to 2012. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Rial was a senior managing director and co-head of the Investment Banking Division at Bear Stearns & Co. in New York after serving at ABN AMRO Bank for 18 years.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Rial has experience as a chief executive officer of a global business, particularly in the key market of Latin America, and has extensive financial experience as a chief financial officer of a global corporation. He has also served on boards of directors of public companies in the food and agricultural industry.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A.
Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A. (2010-2015)

Member, Co-Chair of the Latin America Conservation Council (The Nature Conservancy)

DAVID TAYLOR

Age: 62

Joined Delta’s Board:

August7,2019

Committees:

Finance; Personnel &
Compensation

BIOGRAPHY:

Mr. Taylor is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Procter & Gamble Company. He has been President and Chief Executive Officer since 2015 and was elected Chairman of the Board in 2016. Mr. Taylor joined Procter & Gamble in 1980 and, since that time, has held numerous positions of increasing responsibility in North America, Europe and Asia. Prior to his current role, Mr. Taylor was Group President-Global Beauty, Grooming & Healthcare, Group President-Global Health & Grooming, Group President-Global Home Care and President-Global Family Care. Mr. Taylor also serves as the Chairman of The Alliance to End Plastic Waste, an initiative to advance solutions to eliminate unmanaged plastic waste in the environment.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Taylor has extensive leadership experience, including as the Chief Executive Officer of Procter & Gamble, and extensive experience in a complex global business particularly in the key market of Europe. As part of this proxy statement.experience, Mr. Ralph’s compensation is describedTaylor has developed expertise in “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” in this proxy statement.marketing, innovation and consumer trends. Mr. Rogers, whoTaylor has also served on the board of directors of a global automotive systems supplier, giving him additional insight into complex global operations.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

The Procter & Gamble Company

TRW Automotive (2010-2015)

Member, Board of DirectorsUS-China Business Council

Member, Board of The Consumer Goods Forum

Member, Board of Catalyst

KATHY N. WALLER

Age: 61

Joined Delta’s Board:
July24,2015

Committees:
Audit;Corporate
Governance;
Safety
&
Security

BIOGRAPHY:

Ms. Waller served as the designeeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Delta MEC prior to Mr. Ralph’s electionThe Coca-Cola Company from 2014 until her retirement in 2015, received $202,180March 2019. From May 1, 2017 until her retirement, Ms. Waller had responsibility for Coca-Cola’s strategic governance area as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and President, Enabling Services. Ms. Waller joined Coca-Cola in compensation in 2015, which includes: $143,140 in flight earnings, $33,139 in shared rewards/profit sharing payments1987 as a senior accountant and $25,901 in contributions to a defined contribution plan.assumed roles of increasing responsibility during her career, including Vice President, Finance and Controller.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Ms. Waller has extensive financial experience with a global business enterprise, including her role as Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Waller’s accounting and finance background provides financial and strategic expertise to the Board of Directors.

DIRECTORSHIPS:

AFFILIATIONS:

Beyond Meat, Inc.

CGI Inc.

Cadence Bancorporation

Coca-Cola FEMSA S.A.B. de C.V. (2015-2017)

Monster Beverage Corporation (2015 -2019)

Member, Advisory Committee for Bain Consulting

Member, Board of Trustees of Spelman College

Member, Board of Trustees of University of Rochester

 

(2)ir.delta.com

On June 24, 2015, the Board of Directors granted 3,760 shares of restricted stock to each non-employee director at that date. Mr. Carp received an additional grant of 1,170 shares as part of his compensation as non-executive chairman of the Board. Mr. Donilon was elected to the Board on February 20, 2015 and on that date received an award of 3,380 shares of restricted stock that vested at the next annual meeting, June 25, 2015. Ms. Waller was elected to the Board on July 24, 2015 and on that date received a grant of 3,630 shares of restricted stock. This award vests at the next annual meeting subject to continued Board service on that date. The “Stock Awards” column shows the fair value of the restricted stock granted to each non-employee director in 2015 as determined under FASB ASC Topic 718, based on date of the grant.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     54


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

We are seeking your support for compensation of our named executive officers.

Shareholders have the opportunity to approve, on an advisory, nonbinding basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. This is commonly referred to as a “say on pay” advisory vote. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” this proposal.

As discussed in greater detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the compensation paid to the named executive officers reflects the following principles of our executive compensation program:

Links pay with performance by placing a substantial majority of total compensation at risk.

For 2019, at-risk compensation constituted 94% of the targeted compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and 90% for the other named executive officers.

Utilizes stretch performance measures that provide incentives to deliver value to our shareholders.

The payout opportunities for named executive officers under our annual and long-term incentive plans depend on Delta’s financial, operational and customer service performance as well as the value of our common stock.

Closely aligns the interests of management with frontline employees and shareholders.

Many of the same performance measures are used in both our executive and broad-based employee compensation programs.

Provides compensation opportunities that assist in motivating and retaining existing talent and attracting new talent as needed.

This vote is advisory in nature, which means that it is not binding on Delta, its Board of Directors or the Personnel & Compensation Committee. However, the Personnel & Compensation Committee intends to give careful consideration to the vote results and is committed to take any actions it deems necessary and appropriate in light of those results.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.

 

(3)

The amounts in this column for each non-employee director represent reimbursement of taxes associated with Director Flight Benefits. The amount for Mr. Blake represents the incremental cost of Director Flight Benefits of $14,624 and $32,396 in reimbursement of taxes associated with this benefit. The amount for Mr. Bostock represents the incremental cost of Director Flight Benefits of $10,051 and $25,744 in reimbursement of taxes associated with this benefit. The amount for Mr. Foret represents $10,521 in reimbursement under a benefit plan he had with Northwest Airlines, which the Company is required to honor as a result of its merger with Northwest; and $18,863 in reimbursement of taxes associated with Director Flight Benefits and the benefit plan. No other non-employee director received perquisites or other personal benefits with a total incremental cost of $10,000 or more, the threshold for reporting under SEC rules. From time to time, directors attend events sponsored by Delta at no incremental cost to Delta.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     55


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 3 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

We are asking you to vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of a firm of independent auditors to serve as Delta’s independent auditors until the next annual meeting. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as Delta’s independent auditors for 2020, subject to ratification by the shareholders.

Representatives of EY, which also served as Delta’s independent auditors for 2019, are expected to be present at the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire and will be available to respond to questions. EY has served as our independent auditors since 2006. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the external independent auditors. The Audit Committee has ultimate responsibility for audit fee negotiations associated with the work of EY.

In determining whether to reappoint EY as Delta’s independent auditors for 2020, subject to shareholder ratification, the Audit Committee took into consideration a number of factors. These factors include the length of time the firm has been engaged by Delta; EY’s familiarity with Delta’s operations and industry, accounting policies, financial reporting process, and internal control over financial reporting; its skills, expertise and independence; the quality of the Audit Committee’s ongoing discussions with EY; a review of external data related to EY’s legal risks and proceedings, audit quality and recent public portions of PCAOB reports; an assessment of the professional qualifications of EY, the performance of the lead engagement partner and the other professionals on the Delta account; the reasonableness of EY’s fees for the services provided to Delta; management’s relationship with EY and its assessment of EY’s performance; the Audit Committee’s views on the performance of EY in light of the foregoing matters and the Audit Committee’s belief that continuing to retain EY is in the best interest of Delta and its shareholders. The Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a change in the independent auditors. When the lead engagement partner of the independent auditors is required to rotate off the Delta engagement, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved in selecting a new lead engagement partner.

Delta’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws do not require that shareholders ratify the selection of EY as the independent auditors. We are submitting the selection of the independent auditors for shareholder ratification (as we have done in prior years) because we believe it is a matter of good corporate governance. If shareholders do not ratify the selection of EY, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of the independent auditors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.

 

(4)ir.delta.com

Mr. Carp’s fees paid in cash in 2015 included a $175,000 retainer as non-executive chairman of the Board.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     56


Back to Contents

Fees of Independent Auditors

The following table shows the aggregate fees and related expenses for professional services rendered by Delta’s independent auditors for 2019 and 2018.

Description of Fees

Amount

2019 ($)

Amount

2018 ($)

Audit Fees(1)

4,524,000

4,650,000

Audit-Related Fees(2)

486,000

607,000

Tax Fees(3)

991,000

648,000

All Other Fees(4)

8,000

8,000

(1)

Represents fees for the audit and quarterly reviews of the consolidated financial statements (including an audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting); attestation services required by statute or regulation; assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC; and accounting and financial reporting consultations and research work necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards.

(2)

Represents fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include an audit of subsidiaries, employee benefit plan audits and accounting consultations related to proposed transactions.

(3)

Represents fees for professional services provided for the review of tax returns prepared by the company; assistance with domestic and international tax compliance; and assistance related to the tax impact of proposed and completed transactions.

(4)

Represents fees for online technical resources.

 

(5)

Ms. Reynolds retired from the Board on June 25, 2015. The amount under “All Other Compensation” for Ms. Reynolds includes tax reimbursement for Director Flight Benefits and Retired Director Flight Benefits.

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The charter of the Audit Committee provides that the Committee is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed for Delta by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of all services provided by the independent auditors.

Each year management requests Audit Committee pre-approval of the annual audits, statutory audits, quarterly reviews and any other engagements of the independent auditors known at that time. In connection with these requests, the Audit Committee may consider information about each engagement, including the budgeted fees; the reasons management is requesting the services to be provided by the independent auditors; and any potential impact on the auditors’ independence. As additional proposed audit and non-audit engagements of the independent auditors are identified, or if pre-approved services exceed the pre-approved budgeted amount for those services, the Audit Committee will consider similar information in connection with the pre-approval of such engagements or services. If Audit Committee pre-approvals are required between regularly scheduled Committee meetings, the Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee, or an alternate member of the Audit Committee, the authority to grant pre-approvals. Pre-approvals by the Chair or the alternate member are reviewed with the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.61DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     57


Back to ContentsAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee presently consists of six independent directors and represents and assists the Board of Directors in a number of duties. These duties include oversight of the following, among other matters: the integrity of Delta’s financial statements;statements, including a review of significant accounting policies and estimates; compliance with legal and certain regulatory requirements; cybersecurity and risks associated with the operations of the information technology systems; the performance of the internal audit function; and the financial reporting process; and the enterprise risk management (or ERM) process. In addition, the Committee retains,appoints, oversees and reviews the performance of the independent auditors, who report directly to the Committee. The Committee has the resources and authority it deems appropriate to discharge its responsibilities. The Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which lists specific duties and responsibilities, and is available athttp:https://ir.delta.com/files/doc_downloads/governance/Audit_Committee_Charter.pdf.

The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Easter, Mr. Blake, Mr. Brinzo, Mr. Foret,DeWalt, and Ms. Franklin and Mr. RialWaller has the necessary experience to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules, has agreed to be designated, and has so designated each of them. Each isAll Committee members are considered financially literate as defined by the NYSE, but none is an auditor or an accountant for Delta or performs accounting field work, and none is employed by Delta. In accordance with the SEC’s safe harbor relating to audit committee financial experts, a person designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for purposes of the federal securities laws. In addition, this designation does not impose on a person any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than those otherwise imposed on the person as a member of the Audit Committee and Board of Directors, and does not affect the duties, obligations or liabilities of the Board of Directors.

Management is responsible for Delta’s system of internal control over financial reporting, the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or GAAP,(GAAP), and the financial reporting process, including management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP (or EY)(EY), are responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements and for expressing an opinion, based on the results of their audit, as to whether the consolidated financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with GAAP.

It is not the responsibility of the Audit Committee to prepare consolidated financial statements nor is it to determine that the consolidated financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate and prepared in accordance with GAAP and applicable rules and regulations. These tasks are the responsibility of management. It is also not the responsibility of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements. These tasks are the responsibility of the independent auditors. In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee is not providing any expert, professional or special assurance as to the consolidated financial statements or any professional certification. The Audit Committee relies on the information provided by and representations made to it by management, and also on the report on our consolidated financial statements that it receives from the independent auditors.

In discharging its duties, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors the overall scope and process for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Committee discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 161301 (Communications with Audit Committees) issued by the Public Company Accounting Board.Oversight Board (PCAOB). In addition, the Committeecommittee received from the independent auditors the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable PCAOB requirements regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent auditors their independence from Delta and its management. The Committeecommittee also determined that the independent auditors’ provision of non-audit services in 20152019 to Delta was compatible with the auditors’ independence.

At its meetings, theThe Audit Committee met in private sessions as required by its charter with representatives of EY and members of Delta’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officer, the Controller, the Chief Accounting Officer, the Chief Legal Officer, the Chief Compliance Officer and the Vice President — Corporate Audit and ERM.President-Corporate Audit. The Audit Committee and other attendees discussed and reviewed the following, among other matters: Delta SEC filings; information technology and cybersecurity matters; the scope, resources and work of the internal audit function; the financial reporting process; new accounting standards; the consolidated financial statements and related notes; the scope and progress of testing of Delta’s internal control over financial

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT62DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


reporting; management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Delta’s internal control over financial reporting; ERM;enterprise risk management (ERM); legal and regulatory matters; accounting standards; accounting and controls related to specific Companycompany functions, strategic investments, subsidiaries and accounts; taxes; codesthe use of ethicsnon-GAAP metrics; and business conduct and compliance matters; and information technology controls. The Audit Committee believes the Company benefits when the Committee is briefed on selected business matters and brings its experience, curiosity and independencetax matters.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     58


Back to an active exchange of information and ideas with management.

In determining whether to reappoint EY as Delta’s independent auditors for 2015, subject to stockholder ratification, the Audit Committee took into consideration a number of factors. These factors include the length of time the firm has been engaged by Delta, ten years; EY’s familiarity with Delta’s operations and industry, accounting policies, financial reporting process, and internal control over financial reporting; its skills, expertise and independence; the quality of the Audit Committee’s ongoing discussions with EY; a review of external data related to EY’s legal risks and proceedings, audit quality and recent public portions of PCAOB reports; an assessment of the professional qualifications of EY, the performance of the engagement partner and the other professionals on the Delta account; the reasonableness of EY’s fees for the services provided to Delta; management’s relationship with EY and its assessment of EY’s performance; the Audit Committee’s views on the performance of EY in light of the foregoing matters and whether the Audit Committee believed retaining EY was in the best interest of Delta’s stockholders.Contents

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Delta’s internal control over financial reporting be included in Delta’s 20152019 Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The Audit Committee also appointed EY as Delta’s independent auditors for 2016,2020, subject to stockholdershareholder ratification.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

William H. Easter III,Chair


Francis S. Blake

John S. Brinzo

Mickey
Ashton B. Carter
David G. DeWalt
Michael P. Foret

Shirley C. Franklin

Sergio A.L. Rial

Huerta
Kathy N. Waller

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.63AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     59


Back to Contents

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Proposal 4 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION– RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

A shareholder has submitted a proposal requesting the ability for shareholders to act by written consent. TheBoardrecommendsthatyouvoteAGAINSTthisproposal.

Stockholders

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Mr. John Chevedden, who holds 100 shares of common stock, has submitted the following proposal and supporting statement and has given notice that he intends to present the proposal at the annual meeting.

Proposal 4 - Adopt a Mainstream Shareholder Right – Written Consent

Shareholders request that our board of directors take the steps necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to give shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any appropriate topic for written consent.

Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent. This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 large companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. This proposal topic also won 63%-support at Cigna Corp. (CI) in 2019. This proposal topic would have received higher votes than 63% to 67% at these companies if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

The right for shareholders to act by written consent is gaining acceptance as more important right than the right to call a special meeting. This also seems to be the conclusion of the Intel Corporation (INTC) shareholder vote at the 2019 Intel annual meeting.

The directors at Intel apparently thought they could divert shareholder attention away from written consent by making it less difficult for shareholders to call a special meeting. However Intel shareholders responded with greater support for written consent inn 2019 compared to 2018.

The 2019 edition of this proposal won 37%-support. The 37%-support was significant because the Delta directors apparently thought they could decrease support for this topic by lowering the stock ownership threshold to call a special meeting from 40% to 20%.

After a 45%-vote for a written consent shareholder proposal The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) said it adopted written consent in 2019.

And a proxy advisor set certain minimum requirements for a company adopting written consent in case the directors of a company are tempted to adopt a “fig leaf” version of written consent.

Please vote yes:

ShareholderRighttoActbyWrittenConsent-Proposal4

************************

STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

The Board of Directors strongly supports the principles that the Board should be accountable to all shareholders and that shareholders should be able to raise important matters. The current governance practices and policies of our Board achieve these principles in many ways, including through shareholders’ ability to call special meetings, “proxy access” rights and our shareholder engagement program. As a result, the proposal is unnecessary given Delta’s current governance practices and is not in the best interests of our shareholders as a whole.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     60


Back to Contents

CommitmenttoStrongandEvolvingGovernancePractices. The Board regularly reviews our corporate governance practices and adjusts as necessary to maintain leading governance practices. Our governance program includes the following leading practices:

Annual election of all directors;

Majority voting for directors in uncontested elections;

Independent chairman and separation of chairman and CEO roles;

Proxy access for director candidates nominated by eligible shareholders;

Holders of 20% of outstanding common stock have the ability to call special meetings of shareholders;

No shareholder rights plans or super-majority voting;

Robust annual self-evaluation of the Board and Board committees;

Ongoing Board refreshment and succession planning;

Meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines; and

Additional avenues for shareholder input, including

Ability to suggest director nominees to the Corporate Governance Committee;

Ability to communicate directly with the non-management directors; and

Regular shareholder engagement.

As an example of the Board’s regular review of our governance practices, the Board approved an amendment to Delta’s Bylaws in 2019 to reduce the percentage of voting power required to call a special meeting of shareholders from 40% to 20%. In addition, the Board in February 2020 approved updates to the charter of the Personnel & Compensation Committee to confirm the committee’s oversight of human capital management matters.

ShareholdersHavetheAbilitytoRaiseMattersandActOutsidetheAnnualMeetingCycle. In addition to the ability to present matters at annual meetings, the right of shareholders’ to call a special meeting, along with Delta’s established shareholder communication and engagement practices, provides shareholders with meaningful opportunities to raise important matters and, if necessary, pursue actions for shareholder consideration outside the annual meeting process. A threshold of 20% of the outstanding shares needed to call a special meeting provides shareholders with a meaningful ability to call a special meeting.

As described in the summary section of this proxy statement, we regularly engage with our investors to learn and understand their views. Through direct and regular presentations, conversation with shareholders and active monitoring of communications from shareholders, the company seeks shareholder views on a wide variety of topics including governance and financial performance of the company, our executive compensation programs, ESG and sustainability matters, and strategy and risk management.

These rights and practices provide meaningful, year-round opportunities for shareholders to bring matters to the attention of company management, the Board and other shareholders.

OurCurrentPracticesareEfficientandProtectallShareholders. The transparency of the annual and special meeting process offers important protections and advantages for shareholders that are absent from a written consent process. Shareholder meetings and votes take place transparently on a specified date and with a specified agenda that is publicly announced well in advance, giving all interested shareholders an opportunity to consider proposed actions and express their views. Accurate and complete information about proposed actions is widely distributed in a proxy statement before the meeting, which promotes well-informed consideration on the merits of the proposed actions. Shareholder meetings provide shareholders with a forum for discussion and consideration of the proposed action. In addition, the Board is able to analyze and provide a recommendation with respect to actions proposed to be taken at a shareholder meeting.

In contrast, adoption of this written consent proposal would make it possible for the holders of a simple majority of outstanding shares of Delta’s common stock to take significant corporate action without any prior notice to the company, and without giving all shareholders an opportunity to consider, deliberate, and vote on shareholder actions that may have important ramifications for both Delta and all shareholders. The proposed written consent process would effectively disenfranchise all shareholders who do not have (or are not given) the opportunity to approve, onparticipate in the written consent.

In summary, the Board continues to believe that the strong corporate governance practices already in place at Delta, including the shareholders’ ability to call a special meeting, the robust set of rights and demonstrated responsiveness to shareholders, provide the appropriate means to advance shareholders’ interests without potentially disenfranchising some shareholders. These rights and practices allow the Board to oversee the business and affairs of Delta for the benefit of all shareholders while avoiding the governance risk associated with the right to act by written consent. For these reasons, we believe the ability to act by written consent is neither necessary nor in the shareholders’ best interests.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     61


Back to Contents

Proposal 5 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - CLIMATE LOBBYING REPORT

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

A shareholder has submitted a proposal requesting that the Board of Directors issue a climate lobbying report.TheBoardrecommendsthatyouvoteAGAINSTthisproposal.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

BNP Paribas Asset Management, has represented that it has beneficially owned the requisite amount of our common stock for more than one year, has submitted the following proposal and supporting statement and has notified us that a representative will present the proposal set forth below at the annual meeting.

ClimateLobbyingReport

Shareholders request that the Board of Directors conduct an advisory, nonbinding basis,evaluation and issue a report within the compensationnext year (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) describing if, and how, Delta Air Lines’ lobbying activities (direct and through trade associations) align with the goal of limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius (the Paris Climate Agreement’s goal). The report should also address the risks presented by any misaligned lobbying and the company’s plans, if any, to mitigate these risks.

SupportingStatement

According to the most recent annual “Emissions Gap Report” issued by the United Nations Environment Programme (November 26, 2019), critical gaps remain between the commitments national governments have made and the actions required to prevent the worst effects of climate change. Companies have an important and constructive role to play in enabling policy-makers to close these gaps.

Corporate lobbying activities that are inconsistent with meeting the goals of the named executive officers,Paris Agreement present regulatory, reputational and legal risks to investors. These efforts also present systemic risks to our economies, as discloseddelays in this proxy statement.implementation of the Paris Agreement increase the physical risks of climate change, pose a systemic risk to economic stability and introduce uncertainty and volatility into our portfolios. We believe that Paris-aligned climate lobbying helps to mitigate these risks, and contributes positively to the long-term value of our investment portfolios.

Of particular concern are the trade associations and other politically active organizations that speak for business but, unfortunately, too often present forceful obstacles to progress in addressing the climate crisis.

As investors, we view fulfillment of the Paris Agreement’s agreed goal–to hold the increase in the global average temperature to “well below” 2°C above preindustrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C - as an imperative. We are convinced that unabated climate change will have a devastating impact on our clients, plan beneficiaries, and the value of their portfolios. We see future “business as usual” scenarios of 3-4°C or greater as both unacceptable and uninvestable.

We commend Delta Air Lines for responding to CDP’s annual climate change survey, including information on the company’s direct (in the company’s name) and indirect (through trade associations and other organizations) lobbying efforts related to climate change and their consistency with corporate policy. Two hundred institutional investors managing $6.5 trillion recently wrote to Delta, seeking an answer to a different question: How does Delta work to ensure that its direct and indirect lobbying activities align with the Paris Agreement’s goals, and what does the company do to address any misalignments it has found? The investors received no response to their letter.

Thus, we urge the Board and management to assess the company’s climate related lobbying and report to shareholders.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     62


Back to Contents

STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

The Board of Directors believes that Delta’s lobbying efforts are clearly aligned with responsible climate action, including the reduction of carbon emissions from aviation. For years, Delta has set an industry-leading course of action to reduce greenhouse gasses related to our business. In addition, Delta recently announced that we will commit $1 billion during the next ten years on our journey to become the first carbon neutral airline globally. The need to reduce and remove carbon from our environment is a long-term challenge that will remain after COVID-19 is solved for. Delta remains committed to becoming carbon neutral globally and has not changed its $1 billion commitment over the next 10 years. Our focus and commitment are clear, and lobbying efforts and environmental policies are transparent. Therefore, the proposal does not advance the interests of Delta’s shareholders beyond the steps we have already taken and are continuing to take.

Delta’slobbyingeffortsareclearlyalignedwithresponsibleclimateaction,includingthereductionofcarbonemissionsfromaviation.Delta has focused our emissions lobbying efforts through the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and the U.S. government. This is commonly referredwhere we believe we can have a positive impact on carbon emission issues that affect our industry and create consistent regulation across our operations. Members of IATA, including Delta, have recognized for years the need to address the global challenge of climate change. In 2009, IATA adopted a set of ambitious targets to mitigate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from air transport. These include an average improvement in fuel efficiency of 1.5% per year from 2009-2020, a cap on net international aviation CO2 emissions beginning in 2021 and a reduction in net aviation CO2 emissions by 50% by 2050, relative to 2005 levels.

The cap on net international aviation CO2 emissions was adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a United Nations specialized agency that oversees aviation, as the Carbon Offset and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) in 2016. Delta is actively participating through monitoring, reporting and verification of emissions and through the ICAO Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection working groups. In addition to Delta’s emissions reduction efforts discussed below, Delta has engaged with IATA and the U.S. government to ensure the ICAO process and CORSIA include Delta’s philosophy to address emissions. Subsequent to receiving this proposal, Delta has discussed its lobbying efforts with the proponents.

Deltaisanindustryleaderinthereductionofgreenhousegasses.Prior to and above and beyond our commitment to CORSIA, Delta was the first and only U.S. airline to voluntarily cap greenhouse gas emissions at 2012 levels. This action is significantly more aggressive than CORSIA on several fronts: Delta uses a “saymuch more aggressive baseline (2012 vs. 2019/2020) to cap emissions and implemented the cap nine years ahead of CORSIA; and the cap applies to Delta’s total carbon footprint (domestic, international and all other ground-based emissions), which is third party verified in accordance with The Climate Registry protocol. Through this commitment, Delta has purchased and retired offsets for 12 million metric tons of CO2.

Delta is also focused on pay” advisory vote. maximizing fuel efficiency and exploring alternatives to conventional jet fuel. Fuel efficiency is primarily driven by fleet renewal because new aircraft are 25% more fuel efficient than the aircraft they replace. In the past 5 years, Delta has taken delivery of over 300 new aircraft, about a third of our fleet. We received 88 new aircraft in 2019. New aircraft deliveries have enabled Delta to reduce overall emissions by 9% since 2005. Additionally, Delta has established a Fuel Board and Fuel Council to oversee fuel efficiency targets and progress. In 2019, these initiatives save 33 million gallons of fuel and reduced emissions by 326,000 metric tons. Through these collective efforts, Delta achieved a 2% fuel efficiency improvement in 2019.

Coupled with fleet renewal, Delta is investing in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) to further reduce our carbon footprint and encouraging the U.S. government to expand its support of research into SAF and providing incentives for the use of SAF. SAF is made from alternative feedstocks, including cooking oils, plant oils, municipal waste and agricultural residues. Use of SAF has shown reductions in overall carbon lifecycle emissions up to 80% when compared to conventional jet fuel. Specifically, Delta has partnered with Airbus to fuel delivery flights of new aircraft with an SAF blend. We have invested in a feasibility study to produce SAF from forest debris and have also signed a long-term offtake agreement for 10 million gallons of SAF a year from a facility that will produce SAF from the inedible portions of agricultural corn.

Deltahasrecentlycommitted$1billiontobecomethefirstcarbonneutralairlineglobally.Building on this strong legacy of industry leadership, on February 14, 2020, Delta announced our commitment of $1 billion over the next 10 years on our journey to mitigate all emissions from our global business going forward. We plan to invest in driving innovation, advancing clean air travel technologies, accelerating the reduction of carbon emissions and waste, and establishing new projects to mitigate the balance of emissions.

The company’s efforts to become carbon neutral include the following:

Carbonreduction: Reducing Delta’s carbon footprint through enterprise-wide efforts to decrease the use of jet fuel and increase efficiency. Areas of focus include an ambitious fleet renewal program, improved flight operations, weight reduction, and increased development and use of sustainable aviation fuels.

Carbonremoval: Investing in innovative projects and technology to remove carbon emissions from the atmosphere that go beyond the airline’s current commitments, and investigating carbon removal opportunities through forestry, wetland restoration, grassland conservation, marine and soil capture, and other negative emissions technologies.

Stakeholderengagement: Building coalitions with our employees, suppliers, global partners, customers, industry colleagues, investors and other stakeholders to advance carbon reduction and removal goals and maximize our global impact.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     63


Back to Contents

Delta’slobbyingeffortsandenvironmentalpoliciesaretransparent. Delta’s lobbying activities are subject to comprehensive regulation at both the federal and state levels. Federal law requires the filing of regular, detailed reports with the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives disclosing general and specific lobbying activities that are undertaken on our behalf, which are publicly available. State lobbying activities also are subject to detailed registration and disclosure requirements, and such reports are also publicly available through the applicable state authorities. Delta’s Carbon Emissions Policy and Environmental Policy are publicly available on delta.com at https://www.delta.com/sustainability.

As a result of Delta’s leadership in the airline industry on climate action, our recent significant commitment to become the first global carbon neutral airline, and our responsible and transparent lobbying efforts on environmental matters, the Board does not believe that this proposal is necessary or in the best interests of Delta’s shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     64


Back to Contents

Proposal 6 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS REPORT

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

A shareholder has submitted a proposal requesting the company provide a political contributions report.TheBoardrecommendsthatyouvoteAGAINSTthisproposal.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Friends Fiduciary Corporation, which holds over 2,200 shares of common stock, has submitted the following proposal and supporting statement and has given notice they intend to present the proposal at the annual meeting.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. Political Disclosure Shareholder Resolution

Resolved, that the shareholders of Delta Air Lines Inc. (“Delta” or “Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company’s:

1. Policies and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect) to (a) participate or intervene in any campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.

2. Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used in the manner described in section 1 above, including:

a. The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and

b. The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible for decision-making.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors or relevant board committee and posted on the Company’s website within 12 months from the date of the annual meeting. This proposal does not encompass lobbying spending.

SupportingStatement

As long-term shareholders of Delta, we support transparency and accountability in corporate electoral spending. This includes any activity considered intervention in a political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations, and independent expenditures or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state, or local candidates.

Disclosure is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. The Supreme Court recognized this in its 2010 Citizens United decision, which said, “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.”

Publicly available records show Delta has contributed at least $1,500,000 in corporate funds since the 2010 election cycle (CQMoneyLine: http://moneyline.cq.com; National Institute on Money in State Politics: http://www.followthemoney.org).

However, relying on publicly available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company’s electoral spending. For example, the Company’s payments to trade associations that may be used for election-related activities are undisclosed and unknown. This proposal asks the Company to disclose all of its electoral spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations, which may be used for electoral purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies, including The Coca-Cola Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, and United Technologies Corporation, Inc., which present this information on their websites.

The Company’s Board and shareholders need comprehensive disclosure to fully evaluate the use of corporate assets in elections. We urge your support for this critical governance reform.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     65


Back to Contents

STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

The Board of Directors and its Corporate Governance Committee have considered this proposal and concluded that its adoption would not be in the best interests of our shareholders. As described below, Delta already provides information publicly about its participation in the political process, but believes that providing all of the information requested by the proponent would be detrimental to Delta and its shareholders.

Delta’sparticipationinthepoliticalprocessisessential. The Board of Directors strongly believes Delta should be an effective participant in the political process. Delta is subject to extensive regulation internationally and at the federal, state and local levels of government of the United States. Regulations by governments in the United States and around the world have a significant impact on Delta’s business. Therefore, engagement in the legislative and regulatory process is necessary to Delta’s success and is in the best interests of shareholders. Delta regularly presents its views on public policy and regulatory matters.

Deltaprovidesappropriateinformationaboutitspoliticalcontributions. A report regarding Delta’s political contributions is posted on the Investor Relations website athttp://ir.delta.comon the Governance tab.This report has been refreshed and updated for 2020 to provide additional transparency into Delta’s engagement in the political process.

Delta’sparticipationinthepoliticalprocessissubjecttoappropriateoversighttoensurecompliancewithapplicablelaws. An important part of participating effectively in the political process at the federal, state and local level is making prudent and appropriate political contributions where permitted by applicable law. The Corporate Governance Committee of the board of directors is responsible for overseeing the company’s corporate and PAC political contributions and receives annual formal reports. Management of our participation in such activities is the responsibility of the Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in conjunction with the Senior Vice President – Government Affairs, and the Vice President – State Government Affairs. Delta’s political spending is aligned to a set of giving criteria and not the political preferences of any individual board member, officer or employee.

Political participation takes many forms, including lobbying, making political contributions, and participating in trade associations. In conducting these activities, Delta conducts its business ethically and in compliance with the law. Management regularly consults with outside counsel to ensure political activities undertaken are reported as required by applicable federal, state and local laws.

Delta provides an opportunity for its employees to participate in the political process by joining its non-partisan political action committee, the Delta Air Lines Political Action Committee (“DeltaPAC”). DeltaPAC makes contributions to federal candidates and committees, which are funded solely by the voluntary contributions from PAC eligible employees. Delta does not favor or disadvantage any employee by reason of the amount of their contribution or the decision not to contribute to DeltaPAC. DeltaPAC offers employees an opportunity to speak with a unified voice on issues important to our company. DeltaPAC has its own board of directors, which approves all PAC contributions. The DeltaPAC board of directors has established in its operating guidelines the following criteria to support candidates on a bipartisan basis - their position on Delta’s priority issues, leadership position, committee assignments, representation of Delta operations/people and likelihood of election success. DeltaPAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) and files monthly reports with the FEC. These reports are publicly available and provide an itemization of the DeltaPAC receipts and disbursements, including its contributions to candidates, party committees and any other organizations. DeltaPAC contribution information may be found on the FEC website at: https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00104802.

Delta participates in trade and industry associations, such as the International Air Transport Association and the United States Chamber of Commerce that may support our public advocacy efforts. In addition, Delta rejoined the U.S. trade association Airlines for America in January 2020. Delta is also a member of various chambers of commerce at the state and local level which may participate in public advocacy matters. As a leader in the aviation industry, participation in these organizations allows us to share our business expertise and to be part of public education efforts regarding issues facing our industry and the business community. This process provides for alignment of our engagement with our company’s goals.

The company’s transparent disclosure and oversight of its political activity and contributions are sufficient to address the concerns outlined in the proposal. Accordingly, the Board believes that the report requested in the proposal is unnecessary and redundant. For the foregoing reasons, the Board has concluded this shareholder proposal is not in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     66


Back to Contents

Proposal 7 — SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

A shareholder has submitted a proposal related to the prevention of workplace sexual harassment.TheBoardrecommendsthatyouvoteAGAINSTthisproposal.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Service Employees International Union Pension Plans Master Trust has represented that it has beneficially owned the requisite amount of our common stock for more than one year, has submitted the following proposal and supporting statement and has given notice it intends to present the proposal at the annual meeting.

RESOLVED that shareholders of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) urge the Board of Directors to strengthen Delta’s prevention of workplace sexual harassment by formalizing the Board’s oversight responsibility, aligning senior executive compensation incentives, reviewing (and if necessary overseeing revision of) company policies, and reporting to shareholders by December 31, 2020 on actions taken (omitting confidential and proprietary information, as well as facts relevant to claims against Delta of which Delta has notice).

SUPPORTINGSTATEMENT

Recently, workplace sexual harassment has generated a great deal of attention from the media and policy makers and has spurred significant public debate. The high-profile #metoo social media hashtag, and sexual harassment claims involving public figures like Bill O’Reilly, Steve Wynn, Les Moonves and Travis Kalanick, have highlighted the prevalence of harassment and its impact. The proportion of Americans who believe that sexual harassment in the workplace is a serious problem increased from 47% in 2011 to 64% in 2017. (Cornerstone)

New York and Maryland have passed new laws that, among other things, bar mandatory arbitration of sexual harassment claims. One hundred twenty-five laws were introduced in 2018 in 32 legislatures on the subject of sexual harassment in the legislature itself.

Workplace sexual harassment can damage companies in several ways. First, it may harm corporate reputation, which can alienate consumers. A recent study reported in the Harvard Business Review found that a single sexual harassment claim makes a company seem less equitable and that sexual harassment, more than financial misconduct, is perceived as evidence of a problematic corporate culture.

Companies whose corporate culture tolerates sexual harassment tend to have higher turnover and less productive employees. The Center for American Progress estimates median turnover costs at 21% of an employee’s annual salary. Productivity can fall due to absenteeism, lower motivation, greater conflict and avoiding interaction with harassers. Allegations of sexual harassment can also lead to declines in share value. For example, the market capitalization of Wynn Resorts dropped by $3 billion over two days after allegations of sexual harassment against CEO Steve Wynn surfaced.

A company’s board can play a key role in preventing and remedying sexual harassment by setting the appropriate “tone-at-the-top.” Robust board oversight is especially important for the airline industry. According to one survey, nearly 70% of flight attendants have been sexually harassed while at work. Delta’s in-flight service group constitutes 25.2% of its workforce, Delta’s second largest operational division.

Neither the corporate governance guidelines nor any committee charter assigns responsibility for managing and mitigating of risks related to sexual harassment. While Delta’s incentive plan metrics influence payouts related to front-line employees under the company’s profit sharing plans, the metrics used for incentive compensation do not include evaluations of ethical behavior or contributions to corporate culture. Delta’s 2018 Corporate Responsibility Report makes no reference to sexual harassment, despite highlighting Delta’s workplace safety record and the importance of Delta’s “people-focused” culture. We urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     67


Back to Contents

STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

Delta is committed to maintaining a workplace free from harassment, and the Board of Directors strongly supports the prevention and elimination of incidents of sexual harassment. While Delta supports the underlying goals of the proposal, the Board does not believe that the prescriptive approach outlined in the shareholder proposal is the best way to address the prevention of sexual harassment, nor would it result in an efficient or effective allocation of our resources. We strive to build a safe, harassment-free and inclusive workplace for everyone, and have already established policies and procedures intended to prevent all forms of workplace harassment, including sexual harassment.

DeltaHasAlreadyEstablishedPoliciesandProcedurestoPreventWorkplaceSexualHarassment. As stated in our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, safety is our highest priority, including the safety of our employees. In accord with our core values, we take all forms of harassment very seriously. We have strong policies prohibiting harassment and we provide training to all employees and managers on those policies. We have avenues to report concerns and we address those concerns — including conducting investigations into alleged wrongdoing — promptly and thoroughly. Our policies prohibiting discrimination, harassment and retaliation are set forth in The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, The Way We Fly, Equal Opportunity Policy and–Delta’s most recently adopted policy specifically addressing sexual harassment–Sexual Harassment Policy for New York. Delta maintains and refers to its Internal Investigations Policy and Protocol, which specifically includes all types of harassment, to better protect the safety of our employees and maintain oversight of all harassment (including sexual harassment) reports.

All Delta employees must undergo sexual harassment training, which includes specific examples addressing sexual harassment. In addition, our employees participate in training modules about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which includes a discussion about our policies prohibiting discrimination and harassment. Delta employees are encouraged to act visibly and intentionally to create an atmosphere in which each and every employee at every level of the company has confidence that if they feel they are suffering discrimination, harassment or intimidation of any sort, they can bring those concerns forward. We are committed to providing a safe workplace by investigating those concerns swiftly, fairly and in a way that absolutely ensures that wrongdoers are held accountable and employees suffer no adverse consequences from having raised their concern. Additionally, leaders and managers are given specific training to help them recognize and prevent workplace conditions that may be conducive to sexual harassment, and prepare them to take action if allegations of sexual harassment are brought forward.

As a part of Delta’s open door policy, the Delta Safety, Ethics and Compliance HelpLine makes it easy to report conduct that may be unethical, illegal, a violation of professional standards or contradictory to Delta’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. The HelpLine is available toll-free, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and online via email. Reports to the HelpLine can be anonymous where allowed by local law. Using the HelpLine, employees can speak up about concerns, including those regarding harassment. Reports from the HelpLine regarding sexual harassment are reviewed and investigated promptly by the appropriate department, including Human Resources and Equal Opportunity. In addition, the Law Department and the Ethics & Compliance team meet with representatives from Human Resources, Equal Opportunity, and Corporate Safety, Security & Compliance to review the information gathered during investigations and assist, if necessary, in developing responses.

Further, the Audit Committee charter expressly states that the committee will oversee all procedures and processes relating to Delta’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which includes regular reviews, and periodic reports on any complaints, allegations, and incidents regarding sexual harassment and other forms of unlawful harassment, and workplace discrimination reported pursuant to the Code. Through these regular processes and special reports from Delta’s corporate audit team, the Audit Committee and the Board are actively engaged in the oversight of the prevention of and response to workplace sexual harassment.

Delta’sExecutiveCompensationStructureIsAlignedwiththeInterestsofOurShareholders. As described in our proxy statements, our executive compensation program reflects corporate governance policies and compensation practices that are transparent and consistent with best practices. Supporting our executive compensation program’s goal to reinforce our culture by ensuring a strong connection between pay and performance, Delta has established a broad clawback policy, under which the Company may recoup executive compensation in the event of certain misconduct that violates Company policies. Accordingly, the Company has already aligned its senior executive compensation incentives with the interests of the Company’s shareholders.

Given the robust policies and resources already in place, our commitment to employee safety and our steadfast commitment to ongoing improvement, our Board of Directors does not believe that implementing this proposal would benefit our shareholders. Accordingly, our Board of Directors recommends that youshareholders vote “FOR”“AGAINST” this proposal.

As discussed in greater detail

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     68


Back to Contents

VOTING INFORMATION

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

All of our proxy materials (including our 2019 Form 10-K) are made available to our shareholders on the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies to each shareholder. If you received a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) by U.S. or electronic mail, you will not receive a paper copy of these proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice tells you how to access and review the proxy materials and vote your shares. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials free of charge, follow the instructions in the “Compensation DiscussionNotice. The Notice will be distributed to our shareholders beginning on or about May 7, 2020.

Shareholders Entitled to Vote

The Board of Directors set April 30, 2020 as the record date for the meeting. This means that our shareholders as of the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of and Analysis”to vote at the annual meeting. On April 15, 2020, 637,826,107 shares of Delta common stock were outstanding and we do not expect the number of shares will change materially as of the record date. The common stock is the only class of securities entitled to vote at the meeting. Each outstanding share entitles its holder to one vote.

Quorum for the Annual Meeting

The quorum at the annual meeting will consist of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of all shares of common stock that are outstanding and entitled to vote. Abstentions from voting and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted in determining whether a quorum is present. The meeting will not commence if a quorum is not present.

How to Vote

It is important that you vote in order to play a part in the future of the company. Please carefully review the proxy materials and follow the instructions below to cast your vote.

Shares of Common Stock Registered in Your Name or Held under Plans

The control number you receive in your Notice (or Notices) only covers shares of common stock in any of the following forms:

common stock registered in your name (registered shares);

common stock held in your account under the Delta 401(k) Retirement Plan for Pilots (Pilot Plan);

common stock allocated to your account under the Delta 401(k) Retirement Plan or the Delta 401(k) Retirement Plan for Ready Reserves (collectively referred to as the 401(k) Retirement Plans); or

unvested restricted common stock granted under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Performance Compensation Plan.

SPECIAL NOTE TO DELTA EMPLOYEES ABOUT THE EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

If you are a Delta employee participating in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, any control number you receive in your Notice does not cover shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the plan. These shares are held for your benefit by Fidelity in street name and you must instruct Fidelity regarding voting these shares on your behalf. See “Shares Held in Street Name” on page 70.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     69


Back to Contents

Ifyouholdsharesinmorethanoneofthewayslisted,youmayreceivemorethanoneNoticewithseparatecontrolnumbers.Youwillneedtosubmitvotinginstructionsforsharesassociatedwitheachcontrolnumberinordertovoteallofyourshares.

Your submission of voting instructions for registered shares results in the appointment of a proxy to vote those shares. In contrast, your submission of voting instructions for common stock held in Pilot Plan accounts or allocated to 401(k) Retirement Plans accounts, or for unvested restricted common stock granted under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Performance Compensation Plan, instructs the applicable plan trustee or administrator how to vote those shares, but does not result in the appointment of a proxy. You may submit your voting instructions regarding all shares coveredbythesamecontrolnumberbefore the meeting by using our Internet or telephone system or by completing and returning a proxy card, as described below.As noted above, if you hold shares in more than one way, you will need to vote the shares associated with each control number separately. You may vote in one of the following ways:

VotingbytheInternetorTelephone. You may vote using the Internet or telephone by following the instructions in the Notice to access the proxy materials and then following the instructions provided to allow you to record your vote. After accessing the proxy materials, to vote by the Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions, or to vote by telephone call 1-800-690-6903. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by using a personal identification number. These procedures enable shareholders to confirm their instructions have been properly recorded.

VotingbyProxyCard. If you obtained a paper copy of our proxy materials, you may also vote by signing, dating and returning your instructions on the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Please sign the proxy card exactly as your name appears on the card. If shares are owned jointly, each joint owner should sign the proxy card. If a shareholder is a corporation or partnership, the proxy card should be signed in the full corporate or partnership name by a duly authorized person. If the proxy card is signed pursuant to a power of attorney or by an executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, state the signer’s full title and provide a certificate or other proof of appointment.

Tobeeffective,instructionsregardingsharesheldinyourPilotPlanaccountorallocatedtoyour401(k)RetirementPlansaccountmustbereceivedby5:00 p.m.EasternDaylightTimeonJune16,2020.Instructionsregardingregisteredsharesorunvestedrestrictedcommonstockmustbereceivedby11:59 p.m.EasternDaylightTimeonJune17,2020.

You may also vote registered shares by attending the annual meeting and voting via the online voting platform; this will revoke any proxy you previously submitted.

Note that you may not vote shares of unvested restricted common stock, shares held in your Pilot Plan account or shares allocated to your 401(k) Retirement Plans account at the meeting. If you do not submit voting instructions in a timely manner regarding shares of unvested restricted common stock, shares held in your Pilot Plan account or shares allocated to your 401(k) Retirement Plans account, they will not be voted. See “Shares Held in Street Name” below for information about voting Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares.

All properly submitted voting instructions, whether submitted by the Internet, telephone or U.S. mail, will be voted at the annual meeting according to the instructions given, provided they are received prior to the applicable deadlines described above. All properly submitted proxy cards not containing specific instructions will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations set forth on page 72. The members of Delta’s Board of Directors designated to vote the proxies returned pursuant to this solicitation are Edward H. Bastian and Francis S. Blake.

Shares Held in Street Name

If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other record holder (that is, in street name), refer to the instructions provided by the record holder regarding how to vote your shares or to revoke your voting instructions. This includes any shares purchased through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Without a proxy from the record holder, you may not vote shares held in street name by returning a proxy card. Ifyouholdyoursharesinstreetname,itiscriticalthatyouprovideinstructionsto,or otherwise follow the instructions provided to you in the Notice, voting instruction form or other information provided to you by the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares,ifyouwantyoursharestocountintheelectionofdirectors(Proposal 1),theadvisoryvoteonexecutivecompensation(Proposal 2)andtheshareholderproposals(Proposals4-7). As described in the next section of this proxy statement, the compensation paidregulations prohibit your bank or broker from voting your shares on these proposals, but they may vote your shares on Proposal 3 without instructions.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     70


Back to Contents

Revoking a Proxy or Voting Instructions

If you hold registered shares, unvested restricted common stock, shares in Pilot Plan accounts or shares allocated to 401(k) Retirement Plans accounts, you may revoke your proxy or voting instructions prior to the named executive officers reflectsmeeting by:

providing written notice to Delta’s Law Department at Delta Air Lines, Inc., Dept. No. 981, 1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30354, Attention: CorporateSecretary; or

submitting later-dated instructions by the following principlesInternet, telephone or U.S. mail.

Tobeeffective,revocationofinstructionsregardingsharesheldinPilotPlanaccountsorallocatedto401(k)RetirementPlansaccountsmustbereceivedby5:00 p.m.EasternDaylightTimeonJune16,2020.Revocationofinstructionsregardingregisteredsharesorunvestedrestrictedcommonstockmustbereceivedby11:59 p.m.EasternDaylightTimeonJune17,2020.

You may also revoke your proxy covering registered shares by attending the annual meeting and voting via the online meeting platform. Attending the meeting virtually will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

Limitation on Brokers’ Authority to Vote Shares

Under New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules, brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on certain matters on behalf of our executive compensation program:

Links pay with performance by placing a substantial majority of total compensationclients who do not provide voting instructions at risk.

For 2015, at-risk compensation constituted 94%least 15 days before the date of the targeted compensation forannual meeting. Generally, brokerage firms may vote to ratify the Chief Executive Officerappointment of independent auditors and 90% foron other “discretionary” items. Because proposals other than Proposal 3 are not discretionary items, brokers are not permitted to vote your shares on these proposals unless you provide voting instructions. Accordingly, if your shares are held in a brokerage account and you do not return voting instructions to your broker by its deadline, your shares may be voted by your broker on Proposal 3, but not the other named executive officers.

Utilizes stretch performance measures that provide incentives to deliver value to our stockholders.

The payout opportunities for named executive officers under our annual and long-term incentive plans depend on Delta’s financial, operational and customer service performance as well as the value of our common stock.

Closely aligns the interests of management with frontline employees.

Many of the same performance measures are used in both our executive and broad-based employee compensation programs.

Provides compensation opportunities that assist in motivating and retaining existing talent and attracting new talent as needed.

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the named executive officers’ compensation disclosedproposals described in this proxy statementstatement. Broker non-votes will not be considered in accordanceconnection with SEC rulesProposals 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7. Therefore,weurgeyoutogivevotinginstructionstoyourbrokeronallproposals.

Votes Necessary to Act on such disclosure, includingProposals

At an annual meeting at which a quorum is present, the “Compensation Discussionfollowing votes will be necessary on each of the proposals:

Each director shall be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director. For purposes of this vote, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed 50% of the votes with respect to that director (excluding abstentions).

The advisory vote to approve executive compensation (say on pay) requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and Analysis” sectionentitled to vote at the meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal. While this is a non-binding advisory vote, the Board values the opinions of our shareholders and the tables that follow it,Personnel & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2020 requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal.

Approval of the shareholder proposals described in this proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present and entitled to vote. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal.The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

This vote is advisory in nature, which means that it is not binding on Delta, its Board of Directors or the Personnel and Compensation Committee. However, the Personnel and Compensation Committee intends to give careful consideration to the vote results and is committed to takeBroker non-votes, if any, actions it deems necessary and appropriate in light of those results.

PROPOSAL 264DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


PROPOSAL 3 — APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN

On April 12, 2016, the P&C Committee approved the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Performance Compensation Plan (the “Performance Compensation Plan”), subject to approval by our stockholders at the 2016 annual meeting. The proposed Performance Compensation Plan amends, restates and renames the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan was originally adopted by the Board of Directors in March 2007, and subsequently approved by Delta’s unsecured creditors committee and creditors as part of Delta’s Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. In 2012, our stockholders reapproved the 2007 Plan and the material terms of its performance goals.

In assessing the appropriate terms of the Performance Compensation Plan, the P&C Committee considered, among other items, the existing terms of the 2007 Plan, our compensation philosophy and practices, feedback from our stockholders, as well as input from its executive compensation consultant. Based on this assessment and the success of the 2007 Plan as a part of Delta’s overall compensation program, except as provided below, the terms of the Performance Compensation Plan are substantially identical to the 2007 Plan.

We are requesting stockholders to approve the Performance Compensation Plan pursuant to which an aggregate of approximately 31 million shares of Delta common stock (“shares”) will be available for issuance. In addition, we are requesting stockholder approval so that certain compensation paidhandled as described under the Performance Compensation Plan may qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”).

Why Stockholders Should Approve this Proposal

As described in more detail below, approval of this proposal will accomplish the following:

Maintain the 2007 Plan’s strong governance features

Increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Performance Compensation Plan by 6,650,000 shares

Permit the P&C Committee“Limitation on Brokers’ Authority to continue to grant awards that are intended to qualify as tax-deductible under Section 162(m)

Extend the term of the 2007 Plan to the ten-year anniversary of the 2016 annual meeting

Establish certain award limitations for non-employee members of our Board of Directors

Update the Performance Compensation Plan in other non-material ways that are intended to reflect current best practices with respect to plan administration and compliance matters

The 2007 Plan is scheduled to expire in March 2017, which is before our regularly scheduled 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. We believe it is prudent to seek stockholder approval one year prior to the plan’s expiration as it is a fundamental component of our pay-for-performance compensation programs.

The Board of Directors, the P&C Committee and Delta management all believe that the effective use of performance-based incentive compensation, including equity awards, has been and will continue to be integral to our success. We believe that equity and other performance-based awards incentivize employees and directors to maximize our growth, profitability and overall success, as well as align their interests with the interests of our stockholders to create long-term, sustainable stockholder value. Further, our equity compensation program is vital to our ability to motivate and retain existing talent and attract new talent to Delta when needed. Approving the Performance Compensation Plan would further these objectives by allowing us to continue to grant annual and long-term equity incentive compensation.

If this proposal is not approved, Delta will continue to make grants under the 2007 Plan until its date of expiration in March 2017, and then the 2007 Plan will terminate in accordance with its terms and no further grants may be made under the plan.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.65PROPOSAL 3


Key Features of the Performance Compensation Plan

The following describes key features of the Performance Compensation Plan. We also have included a summary of the material terms of the Performance Compensation Plan under the heading “Summary of the Performance Compensation Plan.” The description of these key features and the summary below do not provide a complete description of all provisions of the Performance Compensation Plan, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual text of the plan document, a copy of which is set forth on Appendix A of this proxy statement as required by the SEC.

Continuation of Good Plan GovernanceVote Shares” above.

 

 

Administered by an independent committee. The Performance Compensation Plan is administered by our P&C Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     71


Back to Contents

Awards require a minimum vesting period. Performance-based awards granted under the Performance Compensation Plan require a minimum vesting period of one year.

Awards are subject to clawback. All awards to our officers under the Performance Compensation Plan are subject to Delta’s compensation clawback policy as described in the “Executive Compensation Policies” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis portion of this proxy statement.

No liberal share recycling. The Performance Compensation Plan prohibits the reuse of shares withheld or delivered to satisfy the exercise price or to satisfy tax withholding requirements of stock options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”).

No discounted stock options or SARs. All stock option and SAR awards must have an exercise price not lower than the market value of the underlying shares on the grant date.

No repricing of stock options or SARs. The Performance Compensation Plan prohibits the repricing of stock options or SARs or the exchange of underwater stock options or SARs for cash or other awards without stockholder approval.

No tax gross ups. The Performance Compensation Plan does not include any tax gross up provisions.

No automatic grants. The Performance Compensation Plan does not permit the grant of stock option reloads.

No evergreen provision. The Performance Compensation Plan does not contain an “evergreen” feature under which the shares authorized for issuance under the plan can be automatically replenished.

Increase Share Authorization. The Performance Compensation Plan sets forth a maximum numberRecommendations of shares authorized for issuance under the plan. Board

The Board of Directors is requesting that stockholders approvesoliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the addition of 6,650,000 shares of Delta common stock toAnnual Meeting as follows:

FOR the share reserve. As of April 18, 2016, 24,321,838 shares remained authorized but unissued under the 2007 Plan; if this proposal is approved, a total of 30,971,838 shares would be available for future issuance under the Performance Compensation Plan. Shares available for issuance may be used to issue any type of award permitted under the plan.

In setting the number of proposed shares issuable under the Performance Compensation Plan, the P&C Committee considered the following factors:

Historical Equity Award Grant Practices. Our three-year average burn rate of 1.01% (as calculated below) was lower than peer company burn rates and industry thresholds established by certain major proxy advisory firms.

PROPOSAL 366DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


Year

  Options
Granted
   Full-
Value
Shares
Granted(1)
   Total Shares
Granted(2)
   Weighted
Average
Number of
Common Shares
Outstanding
   Burn
Rates
 

2015

   267,480     1,546,083     4,132,688     796,832,045     0.52%  

2014

   384,540     2,392,021     6,364,593     836,086,019     0.76%  

2013

   375,000     5,841,271     14,978,178     849,010,910     1.76%  

Three-Year Average

              1.01%  

 

 
(1)

Full Value Shares Granted refers to time-based restricted stock granted during each respective fiscal year and performance awards, which are paid to our executive officers in stock, earned during each respective fiscal year.

(2)

Total Granted calculation is based on the ISS methodology of weighing Full Value Shares Granted more heavily than Options Granted, using a 2.50:1 ratio. For example, the number of Total Shares Granted in fiscal year 2015 was determined as follows: 267,480 options granted in 2015 plus 1,546,083 (the sum of 1,272,820 shares of time-based restricted stock granted in 2015 and 273,263 shares attributable to performance awards earned in 2015 multiplied by 2.50), which equals 4,132,688 total shares granted.

Potential Dilution. We also considered the dilutive effect of the proposed number of shares issuable against the dilution policies of major proxy advisory firms. As of April 18, 2016, 34,526,018 shares were subject to outstanding equity awards or available for future awards under the 2007 Plan (representing 4.5% of fully-diluted shares of common stock outstanding on April 18, 2016). If the proposal is approved, an additional 6,650,000 shares will be available for issuance under the Performance Compensation Plan. As a result, 41,176,018 shares would be subject to outstanding equity awards or available for future awards, resulting in total dilution of 5.3%. This level of potential dilution is near the 25th percentile of companies in our peer group. Therefore, we believe the expected dilution that could result from the Performance Compensation Plan is reasonable for a company of our size in our industry. The following table shows the determination of total potential dilution as of April 18, 2016:

Remaining authorized but unissued shares under the 2007 Plan

24,321,838

Proposed new shares under the Performance Compensation Plan

6,650,000

Shares subject to outstanding Awards

10,204,180

Total

41,176,018

Fully-diluted common shares outstanding

771,856,624

Potential total dilution

5.3

Provide for Tax Deductibility of Certain Awards. The Performance Compensation Plan has been structured so that the P&C Committee can, in its sole discretion, elect to grant equity awards that satisfy the requirements of “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m). Section 162(m) places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount Delta may deduct in any one year for compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other three most highly-paid executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer). Compensation that qualifies as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) is not subject to this deductibility limit. In order to continue to qualify as performance-based compensation, the material termselection of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid—includingdirector nominees named in this proxy statement;

FOR the employees eligible to receive compensation, a descriptionapproval, on an advisory basis, of the relevant business criteriacompensation of Delta’s named executive officers; and

FOR the maximum compensation payable to an employee under the performance goals—must be disclosed to and approved by stockholders. Delta’s stockholders last approved the material terms of the performance goals for awards under the 2007 Plan in 2012. Stockholder approval of this proposal will constitute approval of the material terms of the Performance Compensation Plan for purposes of Section 162(m) with respect to future awards made under the plan. Even if stockholders approve this proposal, however, the Internal Revenue Service may determine that particular awards issued under the Performance Compensation Plan do not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m), and nothing in this proposal precludes Delta or the P&C Committee from granting awards that do not satisfy these requirements.

Extension of the Expiration Date of the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan is currently scheduled to expire in March 2017, and we are requesting an extension of that expiration to the date of the annual meeting of stockholders in

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.67PROPOSAL 3


2026. If this proposal is not approved by stockholders, the 2007 Plan will remain in full force and effect through March 16, 2017, without giving effect to the proposed amendment and restatement.

Award Limitation for Non-Employee Directors. The Performance Compensation Plan includes an award limitation for our non-employee directors. Under this limitation, the maximum value of any awards that may be granted to a non-employee director in any calendar year is $1,000,000.

Summary of Performance Compensation Plan

The following is a summary of certain material provisions of the Performance Compensation Plan.

Purpose. The purpose of the Performance Compensation Plan is to enhance the incentive of those employees, members of the Board of Directors and other individuals who are expected to contribute significantly to the success of Delta and its affiliates in achieving Delta’s short-term and long-term objectives and, in general, to further the best interest of Delta and its stockholders.

Administration. The P&C Committee administers the Performance Compensation Plan and has authority to select individuals to whom awards are granted, determine the types of awards and number of shares covered, and determine the terms and conditions of awards, including the applicable vesting schedule, the effect of termination of service and whether the award will be settled in cash, shares or a combination of the two. The P&C Committee also has authority to interpret and administer the Performance Compensation Plan and the related award agreements, and may make such determinations and take any actions deemed necessary or desirable for the administration of the Performance Compensation Plan. The P&C Committee may delegate to one or more individuals or committees the authority to grant awards to participants who are not directors or executive officers. In addition, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, at any time, grant awards or administer the Performance Compensation Plan.

Eligibility. Employees, consultants, advisors and service providers of Delta and its affiliates, as well as members of the Board of Directors, are eligible to participate in the Performance Compensation Plan. This group currently includes approximately 80,000 individuals.

Shares and Award Limits. Subject to adjustment, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Performance Compensation Plan will not exceed the aggregate of (i) 6,650,000 shares; (ii) the number of shares previously authorized for awards under the 2007 Plan but not reserved for outstanding awards as of the date the Performance Compensation Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders; and (iii) any shares corresponding to awards under the 2007 Plan that are forfeited after the date the Performance Compensation Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders.

Except as described below with respect to non-employee directors, no participant may receive in any calendar year stock options and stock appreciation rights that relate to more than 2 million shares; restricted stock or restricted stock units that relate to more than 1 million shares; or performance awards and other stock-based awards that relate to more than 1.5 million shares. In addition, the maximum amount that may be paid in cash to any participant in a calendar year for an annual cash incentive is $10 million and the maximum long-term cash incentive award is $10 million multiplied by the number of years included in any applicable performance relating to such award. The maximum grant date fair market value of any awards that may be granted to a non-employee director in any calendar year is $1,000,000.

Shares to be issued under the Performance Compensation Plan may be made available from authorized but unissued Delta common stock or Delta common stock that Delta acquires. If any shares subject to an award (other than a substitute award as defined below) expires, is cancelled, forfeited or otherwise terminates without the delivery of shares, then such shares will again be available for issuance under the Performance Compensation Plan (except that any shares tendered in payment of an option, shares withheld by Delta (or tendered by a participant) to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to the exercise of an option or SAR or shares covered by a stock-settled SAR that were not issued upon the settlement of the award will not again be available for distribution). A substitute award is any award granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, an outstanding award previously granted by a company acquired by Delta or with which Delta combines. Shares underlying substitute awards do not reduce the number of shares available for delivery under the Performance Compensation Plan.

PROPOSAL 368DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


The P&C Committee will equitably adjust any or all of the number and type of shares issued under the Performance Compensation Plan or subject to any award thereunder and/or the grant, purchase, or exercise price with respect to any award in the event that any recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of shares or any other similar corporate transaction or event affects the shares such that an adjustment is appropriate to prevent the dilution or enlargement of benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Performance Compensation Plan.

Awards. The Performance Compensation Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, including cash incentive awards, and other stock-based awards.

Stock Options. The exercise price of an option (other than a substitute award) may not be less than the fair market value of a share of Delta common stock on the date of grant and each option has a term to be determined by the P&C Committee (not to exceed ten years). Options may be granted as incentive stock options, which are intended to qualify for favorable treatment to the recipient under federal tax law, or as non-qualified stock options, which do not qualify for this favorable tax treatment. Stock options are exercisable at such time or times as determined by the P&C Committee.

SARs. A SAR may be granted as a free-standing right or in tandem with a stock option. Upon exercise of a SAR, the holder of that SAR is entitled to receive the excess of the fair market value of the shares for which the right is exercised over the exercise price of the SAR. The exercise price of a SAR (other than a substitute award) may not be less than the fair market value of a share of Delta common stock on the date of grant. A tandem SAR may be granted on the grant date of the related option. A tandem SAR will be exercisable only at such time or times and to the extent that the related option is exercisable. A tandem SAR will terminate or be forfeited upon the exercise of the related option, and the related option will terminate or be forfeited upon the exercise or forfeiture of the tandem SAR.

Restricted Stock/Restricted Stock Units. Shares of restricted stock are shares subject to restrictions on transfer and a substantial risk of forfeiture. A restricted stock unit consists of a contractual right denominated in shares which represents the right to receive a share or the value of a share at a future date, subject to certain vesting and other restrictions and such other terms and conditions as the P&C Committee may determine, which restrictions and such other terms and conditions may lapse separately or in combination at such time or times, in such installments or otherwise, as the P&C Committee may deem appropriate.

Performance Awards. The Performance Compensation Plan provides that grants of performance awards, including cash-denominated awards, and (when determined by the P&C Committee) options, restricted stock or other stock-based awards, may be based upon, and subject to achieving performance goals. The performance goals with respect to those awards that are intended to quality as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) are set forth below. Except with respect to awards that are qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), if the P&C Committee determines that a change in Delta’s business, operations, corporate structure or capital structure, or the manner in which Delta conducts its business, or other events or circumstances render the performance goals unsuitable, the P&C Committee may modify the performance goals or the related minimum acceptable level of achievement, in whole or in part, as the P&C Committee deems appropriate and equitable.

Other Awards. The P&C Committee is authorized to grant other stock-based awards, either alone or in addition to other awards granted under the Performance Compensation Plan. Other awards may be settled in shares, cash, awards granted under the Performance Compensation Plan or any other form of property as the P&C Committee determines.

Performance Goals. Under the Performance Compensation Plan, every award that is intended to constitute qualified performance-based compensation shall include a pre-established formula, such that exercise, payment, retention or vesting of the award is subject to the achievement during a performance period or performance periods, as determined by the P&C Committee, of a level or levels of, or improvements in, in each case as

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.69PROPOSAL 3


determined by the P&C Committee, one or more performance measures with respect to Delta or its affiliates or any business unit thereof, based on the following:

Any of the following financial measures:

Revenue per available seat mile

Cost per available seat mile

Total shareowner return

Return on equity, assets, capital or investment

Operating, pre-tax or net income levels expressed in either absolute dollars, earnings per share, or changes of the same

The market price of shares

Economic or cash value added

Capitalization

Net or operating profit margin

Revenues or revenue growth

Expenses

Cash flow

Operating cash flow or liquidity

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and aircraft rent;

the results of employee satisfaction surveys;

the results of customer satisfaction surveys; and

other measures of operational performance (including, without limitation, U.S. Department of Transportation performance rankings in operational areas), quality, safety, productivity or process improvement).

Performance criteria may be measured on an absolute (e.g., plan or budget) or relative basis. Relative performance may be measured against a group of peer companies, a financial market index, or other acceptable objective and quantifiable indices.

In addition to any award limitations (as described above), the P&C Committee has the power to impose such other restrictions on performance-based awards as it may deem necessary or appropriate to ensure that such awards satisfy all requirements for qualified performance-based compensation. However, the P&C Committee is not authorized to increase the amount payable to a “covered employee” (our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other three most highly-paid executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer)) under any qualified performance-based award upon attainment of such pre-established formula. Further, any settlement which changes the form of payment from that originally specified for an award intended to qualify as a performance-based award does not, solely for that reason, fail to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation.

Effect of Termination of Employment or Change in Control. The P&C Committee has authority to determine the treatment of awards in connection with termination of a participant’s employment and any transaction or transactions resulting in a change in control by rule or regulation or in any award agreement or at any time in any individual case. The plan’s standard award agreements provide that upon a change in control, awards will vest only if a participant’s employment is terminated by Delta without cause or by the participant for good reason (a “double trigger”) within two years of the change in control.

Effective Date; Amendment to the Performance Compensation Plan. The Performance Compensation Plan will become effective as of June 10, 2016, subject to stockholder approval, and no award may be granted under the plan on or after the tenth anniversary of that date. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Performance Compensation Plan or in an applicable award agreement, any award granted prior to such tenth anniversary may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the P&C Committee to amend, suspend or

PROPOSAL 370DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


terminate any such award, and the authority of the P&C Committee or the Board of Directors to amend the Performance Compensation Plan, will extend beyond such date.

Except as otherwise provided in an award agreement, the P&C Committee or the Board of Directors may from time to time suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the Performance Compensation Plan and the P&C Committee may amend the terms of any award in any respect; provided that no such action will adversely impair or affect the rights of a holder of an outstanding award under the Performance Compensation Plan without the holder’s consent, and no such action will be taken without stockholder approval, if required by the rules of the stock exchange on which shares are traded.

No Repricing without Stockholder Approval.Unless approved by stockholders, no stock option or SAR may (i) be amended to decrease its exercise price; (ii) be canceled in exchange for the grant of any new option or SAR with a lower exercise price or any other award; (iii) be repurchased by Delta or its affiliates; or (iv) otherwise be subject to any action that would be treated under accounting rules, stock exchange rules or otherwise as a repricing of such stock option or SAR (including a cash buyout or voluntary surrender/subsequent regrant of an underwater stock option or SAR).

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of awards made under the Performance Compensation Plan, based upon the laws currently in effect. The discussion is general in nature and does not take into account a number of considerations which may apply in light of the individual circumstances of a participant under the Performance Compensation Plan. The income tax consequences under applicable state and local tax laws may not be the same as under U.S. federal income tax laws.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option and Delta will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and be subject to income tax and employment tax withholding) upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased pursuant to such option over their exercise price, and Delta generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of an incentive stock option. A participant will not recognize taxable income (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax) upon exercise of an incentive stock option. If the shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the date the option was granted and one year from the date the shares were transferred to the participant, any gain or loss arising from a subsequent disposition or such shares will be taxed as a long-term capital gain or loss, and Delta will not be entitled to any deduction. If, however, such shares are disposed of within such two or one year periods, then in the year of such disposition the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the excess of the lesser of the amount realized upon such disposition and the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and Delta generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The excess of the amount realized on a subsequent sale or exchange over the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date generally will be treated as a capital gain.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of a SAR, and Delta will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. Upon exercise, a participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and be subject to income and employment tax withholding) equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by Delta, and Delta generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

Restricted Stock. A participant who receives an award of restricted stock does not generally recognize taxable income upon the grant of the award. Instead, the participant recognizes ordinary income in the first taxable year in which the participant’s interest in the shares becomes either (i) freely transferable or (ii) no longer subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. The amount of taxable income is equal to the fair market value of the shares less the cash, if any, paid for the shares. A participant may elect to recognize income at the time of the grant of restricted stock in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock (less any cash paid

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.71PROPOSAL 3


for the shares) on the date of the award. Delta generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction in the taxable year in which the restrictions lapse (or in the taxable year of the award if, at that time, the participant had filed a timely election to accelerate recognition of income).

The foregoing general tax discussion is solely intended for the information of stockholders considering how to vote with respect to this proposal and not as tax guidance to participants in the Performance Compensation Plan. Participants should consult their own tax advisors regarding the federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences to them in participating in the Performance Compensation Plan.

New Plan Benefits.Because benefits under the Performance Compensation Plan will depend on the P&C Committee’s actions and the fair market value of the shares at various future dates, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received by directors, executive officers and other employees.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information about the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under Delta’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.

Plan Category

  (a) No. of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(1)
   (b) Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(2)
   (c) No. of  Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation

Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a))(3)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders

   6,559,843    $12.09     26,839,417  

Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders

               
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

   6,559,843    $12.09     26,839,417  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Includes a maximum of 1,293,023 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the achievement of certain performance conditions under outstanding performance share awards as of December 31, 2015.

(2)

Includes performance share awards, which do not have exercise prices. The weighted average exercise price of options is $15.05.

(3)

Reflects shares remaining available for issuance under Delta’s 2007 Performance Compensation Plan. If any shares of our common stock are covered by an award under the 2007 Plan that is canceled, forfeited or otherwise terminates without delivery of shares (including shares surrendered or withheld for payment of the exercise price of an award or taxes related to an award), then such shares will again be available for issuance under the 2007 Plan except for (i) any shares tendered in payment of an option, (ii) shares withheld to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to the exercise of an option or stock appreciation right (“SAR”), or (iii) shares covered by a stock-settled SAR or other awards that were not issued upon the settlement of the award. Because 2,489,492 shares of restricted stock remain unvested and subject to forfeiture, these shares could again be available for issuance.

Other Key Data.The following table provides information about the number of shares of common stock that was subject to outstanding awards under Delta’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.

Award

  Number
Outstanding
   Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Term
 

Options & SARs

   5,300,000    $15.05     3.75  

Full Value Awards(1)

   4,552,959      

Total Overhang

   9,852,959      

(1)Full Value Awards refers to non-vested time-based restricted stock and performance awards outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

PROPOSAL 372DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as Delta’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (“independent auditors”) for 2016, subject to ratification by the stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP, which also served as Delta’s independent auditors for 2015, are expected to be present at the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire and will be available to respond to questions.

Delta’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws do not require that stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors. We are submitting the selection of the independent auditors for stockholder ratification (as we have done in prior years) because we believe it is a matter of good corporate governance. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Delta’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2016 requires2020.

AGAINST the affirmative vote ofshareholder proposals described in this proxy statement.

All properly submitted proxy cards not containing specific instructions will be voted in accordance with the majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of the independent auditors.The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.Board’s recommendations.

Fees of Independent Auditors for 2015 and 2014

The following table shows the aggregate fees and related expenses for professional services rendered by Delta’s independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, for 2015 and 2014.

Description of Fees

  Amount
2015($)
   Amount
2014 ($)
 

Audit Fees(1)

   3,987,000     3,625,000  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   170,000     207,000  

Tax Fees(3)

   1,641,000     1,060,000  

All Other Fees(4)

   6,000     141,000  

 

(1)ir.delta.com

Represents fees for the audit and quarterly reviews of the consolidated financial statements (including an audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting); attestation services required by statute or regulation; assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC including a debt refinancing in 2015; and accounting and financial reporting consultations and research work necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     72


Back to Contents

(2)

Represents fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include an audit of our refinery and captive insurance subsidiaries, employee benefit plan audits and attest services.

OTHER INFORMATION

(3)

Represents fees for professional services provided for the review of tax returns prepared by the company; assistance with international tax compliance; and assistance related to the tax impact of proposed and completed transactions.

(4)

Represents fees in 2014 for commodity risk policy review; airline international financial reporting standards (IFRS) analysis; certain services in Japan; and online technical resources in both years.

Pre-ApprovalPresentation of Audit and Non-Audit ServicesOther Business at the Meeting

Delta is not aware of any business to be transacted at the annual meeting other than as described in this proxy statement. If any other item or proposal properly comes before the meeting (including, but not limited to, a proposal to adjourn the meeting in order to solicit votes in favor of any proposal contained in this proxy statement), the proxies received will be voted at the discretion of the directors designated to vote the proxies.

Attending the Meeting Virtually

The chartersafety of our shareholders, employees and other attendees at the annual meeting is of utmost concern to us. Accordingly, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we plan to hold the annual meeting virtually. To attend and participate in the annual meeting, shareholders will need to access the live audio webcast of the Audit Committee provides thatmeeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAL2020 and using their 16-digit control number provided in the Committee is responsible forNotice or proxy card to log in to this website. Beneficial owners of shares held in street name will need to follow the pre-approval of all audit and permitted non-audit servicesinstructions provided to be performed for Delta bythem in the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of all servicesNotice, voting instruction form or other information provided by the independent auditors.broker, bank or other nominee that holds their shares. Shareholders who attend and participate in our annual meeting will have an opportunity to have questions answered at the meeting.

Each year management requests Audit Committee pre-approval ofWe encourage shareholders to log in to this website and access the webcast before the annual audits, statutory audits, quarterly reviews andmeeting’s start time. We plan to have technicians ready to assist you with any other engagement oftechnical difficulties you may have accessing the independent auditors known atvirtual meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during check-in or during the meeting, please call the technical support number that time. In connection with these requests, the Audit Committee may consider information about each engagement, including the budgeted fees; the reasons management is requesting the services towill be provided by the independent auditors; and any potential impactposted on the auditors’ independence. As additional proposed auditvirtual shareholder meeting login page: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAL2020. Further instructions on how to attend, participate in and non-audit engagements of the independent auditors are identified, or if pre-approved services exceed the pre-approved budgeted amount for those services, the Audit Committee will consider similar information in connection with the pre-approval of such engagements or services. If Audit Committee pre-approvals are required between regularly scheduled Committee meetings, the Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee, or an alternate member of the Audit Committee, the authority to grant pre-approvals. Pre-approvals by the Chair or the alternate member are reviewed with the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

PROPOSAL 473DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


PROPOSAL 5 — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL — SENIOR EXECUTIVE STOCK RETENTION REQUIREMENT

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters on behalf of the Teamsters General Fund, 25 Louisiana Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20001, which represents that the Teamsters General Fund is the beneficial owner of 425 shares of common stock, has given notice that it intends to present the following resolutionvote at the annual meeting.

RESOLVED: Shareholdersmeeting virtually, including how to demonstrate your ownership of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the “Company”) urge the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) to adopt a policy requiring that senior executives retain a significant percentage of shares acquired through equity compensation programs until reaching normal retirement age or terminating employment with the Company. For the purpose of this policy, normal retirement age shall be defined by the Company’s qualified retirement plan that has the largest number of plan participants. The shareholders recommend that the Committee adopt a share retention percentage requirement of at least 50 percent of net after-tax shares. The policy should prohibit hedging transactions for shares subject to this policy, which are not sales but reduce the risk of loss to the executive. This policy shall supplement any other share ownership requirements that have been established for senior executives, and should be implemented so as not to violate the Company’s existing contractual obligations or the terms of any compensation or benefit plan currently in effect.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT [OF PROPONENT]: Equity-based compensation is an important component of senior executive compensation at our Company. While we encourage the use of equity-based compensation for senior executives, we are concerned that our Company’s senior executives are generally free to sell shares received from our Company’s equity compensation plans. In our opinion, the Company’s current share ownership guidelines for its senior executives do not go far enough to ensure that the Company’s executive compensation plans continue to build stock ownership by senior executives over the long-term.

For example, our Company’s share ownership guidelines require the CEO to hold 400,000 shares. In comparison, the 2015 proxy statement shows the CEO owns 3,390,731 shares. What’s more, in 2014, the Company granted the CEO 155,020 restricted shares and 252,700 performance stock options. In other words, one year’s worth of equity awards surpasses the Company’s long-term share ownership guidelines for the CEO.

We believe that requiring senior executives to only hold shares equal to a set target loses effectiveness over time. After satisfying these target holding requirements, senior executives are free to sell all the additional shares they receive in equity compensation.

Our proposal seeks to better link executive compensation with long-term performance by requiring a meaningful share retention ratio for shares received by senior executives from the Company’s equity compensation plans. Requiring senior executives to hold a significant percentage of shares obtained through equity compensation plans until they reach retirement age will better align the interests of executives with the interests of shareholders and the Company. A 2009 report by the Conference Board Task Force on Executive Compensation observed that such hold-through-retirement requirements give executives “an ever growing incentive to focus on long-term stock price performance as the equity subject to the policy increases” (available at http://www.conferenceboard.org/pdf_free/ExecCompensation2009.pdf).

We urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.

********************

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST PROPOSAL 5 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

The Board of Directors strongly supports the principle that Delta’s executive compensation program should closely align management and stockholder interests. The current policies and programs achieve this alignment through appropriate stock ownership guidelines, an insider trading policy that prohibits hedging or pledging of Delta stock and an executive compensation program that emphasizes long-term equity performance. This view was shared by an overwhelming majority of Delta’s stockholders who rejected a substantially identical proposal from the proponent in each of the lastthree years.

PROPOSAL 574DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines that require all executive officers to attain specific levels of stock ownership. Under the guidelines, the Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents named as reporting officers under Section 16 of the 1934 Act are required to beneficially own a number of shares of Delta common stock equal to or greater than the amounts specified below:

Shares Equal to a
Multiple of Base
Salary
OR    Shares

CEO

8x400,000

President

6x200,000

Executive Vice Presidents

4x150,000

Section 16 SVPs

4x75,000

Each executive officer must hold at least fifty percent of all “net shares” received through restricted stock vesting or realized through stock option exercises until he or she achieves the applicable guidelines. The ownership levels must be achieved within five years after a person’s initial appointment as an executive officer.

These guidelines create an alignment of the interests of the executive officers and stockholders. All of Delta’s executive officers currently exceed these guidelines by significant amounts. In particular, as of the record date, for this meeting, Ed Bastian, Delta’s Chief Executive Officer effective May 2, 2016, owned more than 300,000 shares of common stock with a market value as of that date expected to be approximately 19 times his annual base salary.are also available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAL2020.

Delta’s Board has also adopted a broad prohibition against hedging transactions. The proponent suggests either that Delta does not have this type of policy or it should adopt an unnecessarily redundant policy. In fact, Delta’s insider trading policy has long prohibited executive officers from engaging in exchange-traded put and call transactions and short sales involving Delta stock. The policy was revised in 2012 to prohibit all employees from engaging in hedging transactions involving Delta securities and pledging Delta common stock. Therefore, the adoption of the proposal for the purpose of implementing restrictions on hedging is not necessary as this restriction is already in place and applicable to all shares owned by Delta executives whether obtained through equity compensation plans or otherwise.Householding

As described inpermitted by the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section1934 Act, only one copy of this proxy statement Delta’s executive compensation philosophy creates a pay for performance culture that:

places a substantial majorityis being delivered to shareholders residing at the same address, unless the shareholders have notified Delta of total compensation at risk and utilizes stretch performance measures that provide incentivestheir desire to deliver value to our stockholders;

closely aligns the interests of management with frontline employees by using manyreceive multiple copies of the same performance measures in both our executive and broad-based compensation programs; andproxy statement. This is known as householding.

provides compensation opportunities that assist in motivating and retaining existing talent and attracting new talent to Delta when needed.

Delta’s executive compensation program is therefore designed so that the majoritywill promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the executive officers’ compensation consistsproxy statement to any shareholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies for the current year or future years should be directed to Delta’s Investor Relations toll free at (866) 715-2170.

Shareholders of long-term incentive awards paidrecord residing at the same address and currently receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement may contact our registrar and transfer agent, EQ Shareowners Services, to request that only a single copy of the proxy statement be mailed in the form of stock. Delta’s Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation opportunityfuture. Contact EQ by phone at (800) 259-2345 or by mail at P.O. Box 64854, St. Paul, MN 55164-0854.

If you hold your shares in 2015 was weighted approximately 83% towards equity-based pay components, the majority of which are earned contingent upon Delta meeting pre-established performance criteria. The compensation opportunity of other named executive officers is also heavily weighted towards stock-based compensation at 75% of their total compensation.

The structure of Delta’s executive compensation program therefore aligns with the goal of creating long-term value for Delta’s stockholders. This structure ties the ultimate value of long-term awardsstreet name, you should contact Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 or by calling 1-866-540-7095 to the achievement of key measuresrequest that only a single copy of the success ofproxy statement be mailed in the business, including return on invested capital, average annual operating margin relative to airline peers and customer service performance, as well as stock price performance and continued employment with Delta. The Board believes that Delta’s executive officers are appropriately incentivized to create long-term value for Delta’s stockholders.

future.

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.75PROPOSAL 5

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     73


The current policies reflect an appropriate balance between offering the right incentives for executive officersBack to create long-term value for stockholders and providing compensation programs that attract and retain executives. Implementing the proponent’s recommendation that executive officers retain 50% of their equity compensation until retirement would be unduly restrictive on Delta’s compensation programs, thereby negatively affecting Delta’s ability to retain and attract executive officers. Delta’s stockholders are better served by flexible policies that are effective in retaining and attracting executive officers who can facilitate the creation of long-term stockholder value.Contents

For these reasons, adoption of this policy is unnecessary and would not be beneficial to stockholders.

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

PROPOSAL 576DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


OTHER MATTERS

Cost of Solicitation

Delta will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Delta hasWe have retained Innisfree to solicit proxies, by telephone, in person or by mail, for a fee of $15,000$25,000 plus certain expenses. In addition, certain Delta officers and employees, who will receive no compensation for their services other than their regular salaries, may solicit proxies. Delta will also reimburse banks, brokers and other nominees for their costs in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of Delta stock. Other proxy solicitation expenses that Deltawe will pay include those for preparing, mailing, returning and tabulating the proxies.

Submission of StockholderShareholder Proposals

To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 20172021 annual meeting, stockholdershareholder proposals other than a director nomination must comply with the requirements under SEC Rule 14a-8 and must be submitted in writing and received by us no later than 5:00 p.m., local time, on December 31, 2016,January 7, 2021, at the following address:

 

Bydelivery:

Bymail:

By delivery:

By mail:

Law Department

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Department 981

1030 Delta Boulevard

Atlanta, Georgia 30354

Attention: Chief Legal Officer

Law Department

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Department 981

P.O. Box 20574

Atlanta, Georgia 30320

Attention: Chief Legal Officer

Under certain circumstances, shareholders may also submit nominations for directors for inclusion in our proxy materials by complying with the requirements in Article II, Section 9 of our Bylaws. Director nominations to be considered for inclusion in proxy materials for the 2021 annual meeting must be received by us at the address above no earlier than December 8, 2020 and no later than January 7, 2021.

In addition, a stockholdershareholder may only bring business before the 2021 annual meeting, other than a proposal included in the proxy statement, or may submit nominations for directors, if the stockholdershareholder complies with the requirements specified in Article II, Section 8 of Delta’sour Bylaws. The requirements include:

providing written notice that is received by Delta’s Corporate Secretary between February 11, 201719, 2021 and March 12, 201720, 2021 (subject to adjustment if the date of the 20172021 annual meeting is moved by more than 30 days, as provided in Article II, Section 8(b) of the Bylaws); and

supplying the additional information listed in Article II, Section 8(b) of the Bylaws.

Delta’s Bylaws are available athttp://ir.delta.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.

A proxy granted by a stockholdershareholder will give discretionary authority to the proxies to vote on any matters introduced pursuant to the notice provision in our Bylaws, subject to the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates potential nominees for director suggested by shareholders on the same basis as all other potential nominees. To recommend a potential nominee, you may:

e-mail nonmgmt.directors@delta.comor

send a letter addressed to Delta’s Law Department at Delta Air Lines, Inc., Dept. No. 981, 1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30354, Attention: CorporateSecretary.

Each potential nominee is reviewed by the Committee, which decides whether to recommend a candidate for consideration by the full Board.

ir.delta.com

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     74


Back to ContentsSection 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities (“reporting persons”) to file certain reports concerning their beneficial ownership of our equity securities. We believe that during 2015 all reporting persons timely complied with their Section 16(a) filing obligations.

Supplemental Information about Financial Measures

We sometimes use information that is derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements, but that is not presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”)(GAAP). Certain of this information is considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under the U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC rules. The non-GAAP financial measures may be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. The tables below show reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures used in this proxy statement to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations may not calculate correctly due to rounding.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.77OTHER MATTERS


Pre-Tax Income, adjusted.adjusted

We adjust pre-tax income for the following items to determine pre-tax income, adjusted for special items, for the reasons described below:described.

MTM adjustments and settlements. MTMMARK-TO-MARKET (“MTM”) ADJUSTMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS ON HEDGES

Mark-to-market (“MTM”) adjustments are defined as fair value changes recorded in periods other than the settlement period. Such fair value changes are not necessarily indicative of the actual settlement value of the underlying hedge in the contract settlement period. Settlements represent cash received or paid on hedge contracts settled during the applicable period. These items

EQUITY INVESTMENT MTM ADJUSTMENTS

We record our proportionate share of earnings/loss from our equity investments in Virgin Atlantic and Aeroméxico in non-operating expense. We adjust fuelfor our equity method investees’ MTM adjustments to allow investors to understand and analyze our core financial performance in the periods shown.

MTM ADJUSTMENTS ON INVESTMENTS

Unrealized gains/losses on our equity investments in GOL, China Eastern, Air France-KLM and Hanjin-KAL, the largest shareholder of Korean Air, which are accounted for at fair value in non-operating expense, to showare driven by changes in stock prices and foreign currency. During the economic impact of hedging, including cash received or paid on hedge contracts during the period.December 2019 quarter, we sold our GOL investment, which generated a gain in adjusted results that had previously been included in GAAP results. Adjusting for these itemsgains/losses allows investors to better understand and analyze our core operational performance in the periods shown.

Restructuring and other.DGS SALE ADJUSTMENT

Because we sold DAL Global Services, LLC (“DGS”) in December 2018, we have excluded the impact of the variability in restructuring and other, the adjustmentDGS from 2018 results for this item is helpful to investors to analyze our recurring core performance in the periods shown.comparability.

Loss on extinguishment of debt. We adjusted for loss on extinguishment of debt to assist investors with their analysis of our recurring core financial performance.

Virgin Atlantic MTM adjustments. We record our proportionate share of earnings from our equity investment in Virgin Atlantic in non-operating expense. We adjust for Virgin Atlantic’s MTM adjustments to allow investors to better understand and analyze our core financial performance in the periods shown.

   Year Ended December 31, 

(in billions)

  2015  2014   2013  2012   2011 

Pre-tax income

  $7.2   $1.1    $2.5   $1.0    $0.8  

Adjusted for:

        

MTM adjustments and settlements

   (1.3  2.3     (0.3         

Restructuring and other

       0.7     0.5    0.5     0.2  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

       0.3         0.1     0.1  

Virgin Atlantic MTM adjustments

       0.1                
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pre-tax income, adjusted

  $5.9   $4.5    $2.7   $1.6    $1.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income, adjusted. We adjust net income for tax effected items excluded from pre-tax income, adjusted, for the same reasons described above, and for the release of tax valuation allowance to determine net income, adjusted for special items. In 2013, our expectations for sustainable future profitability combined with our consistent and strong profitability over the prior four years resulted in the reversal of our tax valuation allowance. The reversal of the tax valuation allowance resulted in a non-cash net gain of $8.0 billion. Because of the uniqueness of the net gain related to the tax valuation allowance, the exclusion of this gain allows investors to better understand and analyze the company’s core performance in the periods shown.

   Year Ended December 31, 

(in billions)

  2015  2014   2013  2012   2011 

Net income

  $4.5   $0.7    $10.5   $1.0    $0.9  

Adjusted for:

        

Tax effected items excluded from pre-tax income, adjusted

   (0.8  2.1     0.2    0.6     0.3  

Release of tax valuation allowance

            (8.0         
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income, adjusted

  $3.7   $2.8    $2.7   $1.6    $1.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Year Ended December 31

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Pre-tax income

$

6,198

 

$

5,151

 

Adjusted for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTM adjustments and settlements on hedges

 

14

 

 

(53

)

Equity Investment MTM adjustments

 

(14

)

 

29

 

MTM Adjustments on investments

 

13

 

 

(14

)

DGS sale adjustment

 

-

 

 

(31

)

Total Adjustments

 

13

 

 

(69

)

PRE-TAX INCOME, ADJUSTED

$

6,211

 

$

5,082

 

 

OTHER MATTERS78DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     75


Adjusted Net Debt.Back to Contents

After-Tax Return on Invested Capital

We use adjusted total debt, including aircraft rent, in addition to long-term adjusted debt andpresent after-tax return on invested capital leases, to present estimated financial obligations. We reduce adjusted debt by cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and hedge margin receivable, resulting in adjusted net debt, to present the amount of assets needed to satisfy the debt. Managementas management believes this metric is helpful to investors in assessing the company’s overall debt profile. Management has reduced adjusted debt by the amount of hedge margin receivable, which reflects cash posted to counterparties, as we believe this removes the impact of current market volatility on our unsettled hedges and is a better representation of the continued progress we have made on our debt initiatives.

(in billions)

 December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
  December 31,
2011
  December 31,
2009
 

Debt and capital lease

obligations

 $8.3    $9.7    $11.2    $12.6    $13.6    $17.2   

Plus: unamortized discount, net and debt issuance costs

  0.1     0.2     0.5     0.6     0.8     1.1   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Adjusted debt and capital lease obligations

  $8.4    $9.9    $11.7    $13.2    $14.4    $18.3  

Plus: 7x last twelve months’ aircraft rent

   1.8     1.6     1.5     1.9     2.1     3.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted total debt

   10.2     11.5     13.2     15.1     16.5     21.7  

Less: cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

   (3.4   (3.3   (3.8   (3.4   (3.6   (4.7

Less: hedge margin receivable

   (0.1   (0.9                    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net debt

  $6.7    $7.3    $9.4    $11.7    $12.9    $17.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pre-Tax Margin, adjusted. We exclude MTM adjustments and settlements, restructuring and other, loss on extinguishment of debt and Virgin Atlantic MTM adjustments for the same reasons described above under pre-tax income, adjusted, and for the reason described below.

Refinery sales. Delta’s refinery segment provides jet fuel to the airline segment from its own production and from jet fuel obtained through agreements with third parties. Activities of the refinery segment are primarily for the benefit of the airline. However, from time to time, the refinery sells fuel by-products to third parties. These sales are recorded gross within other revenue and other operating expense. We believe adjusting for refinery sales allows investors to better understand and analyze the impact of fuel cost on our results in the periods shown.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2015  2014  Change 

Pre-tax margin

   17.6   2.7 

Adjustments:

    

MTM adjustments and settlements

   (3.2)  5.8 

Restructuring and other

   0.1   1.8 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   0.0   0.7 

Virgin Atlantic MTM adjustments

   (0.1)  0.0 

Refinery sales

   0.1   0.3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Pre-tax margin, adjusted

   14.5   11.3  3.2 pts  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.79OTHER MATTERS


Free Cash Flow. We present free cash flow because management believes this metric is helpful to investors to evaluate the company’s ability to generate cash that is available for use for debt service or general corporate initiatives. Adjustments include:

Hedge deferrals. During 2015, we effectively deferred settlement of a portion of our hedge portfolio until 2016 by entering into fuel derivative transactions that, excluding market movements from the date of inception, would settle and provide approximately $300 million in cash receipts during the during the second half of 2015 and require approximately $300 million in cash payments in 2016. By effectively deferring settlement of a portion of the original derivative transactions, the restructured hedge portfolio provided additional time for the fuel market to stabilize. Free cash flow is adjusted to include these deferral transactions in order to allow investors to better understand the net impact of hedging activities in the period shown.

Hedge margin. Free cash flow is adjusted for hedge margin as we believe this adjustment removes the impact of current market volatility on our unsettled hedges and allows investors to better understand and analyze the company’s core operational performance in the period shown.

(in billions)

  Year Ended
December 31,
2015
 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $7.9  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (4.0

Adjustments:

  

Hedge deferral

   0.4  

Hedge margin

   (0.8

Net purchases of short-term investments and other

   0.3  
  

 

 

 

Total free cash flow

  $3.8  
  

 

 

 

Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”). We present ROIC as management believes this metric is helpful to investors in assessing our ability to generate returns using its invested capital. ROICcapital as a measure against the industry. Return on invested capital is operatingtax-effected adjusted total pre-tax income adjusted, divided by average adjusted average invested capital. We adjust operating incomeAverage adjusted invested capital represents the sum of the adjusted book value of equity at the end of the last five quarters, adjusted for MTM adjustmentspension and settlements and restructuring andfuel hedge impacts within other forcomprehensive income. Average adjusted gross debt is calculated using amounts as of the same reasons discussed above for pre-tax income.end of the last five quarters. All adjustments to calculate ROIC are intended to provide a more meaningful comparison of our results to the airline industry and other high-quality industrial companies.industry.

(in billions, except % of return)

  Year Ended
December 31,
2015
 

Operating Income

  $7.8  

Adjusted for:

  

MTM adjustments and settlements

   (1.3

Restructuring and other

     

7x annual interest expense included in aircraft rent

   0.2  

Amortization of retirement actuarial loss

   0.2  
  

 

 

 

Operating income, adjusted

  $6.9  
  

 

 

 
  
  

 

 

 

Adjusted book value of equity

  $17.6  

Average adjusted net debt

   6.9  
  

 

 

 

Average invested capital(1)

  $24.5  
  

 

 

 

Return on invested capital

   28.3
  

 

 

 

(in billions, except % of return)

 

Year Ended December 31

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Pre-tax income

$

6.2

 

$

5.2

 

$

5.5

 

Adjusted for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTM adjustments and settlements on hedges

$

--

 

$

(0.1

)

$

(0.3

)

Equity investment MTM adjustments

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

0.1

 

Interest expense, net

 

0.3

 

 

0.3

 

 

0.4

 

Interest expense included in aircraft rent

 

0.3

 

 

0.2

 

 

0.2

 

Amortization of retirement actuarial losses

 

0.3

 

 

0.3

 

 

0.2

 

Pre-tax adjusted income

$

7.1

 

$

5.9

 

$

6.1

 

Tax effect

 

(1.6

)

 

(1.4

)

 

(2.1

)

Tax-effected adjusted total pre-tax income

$

5.5

 

$

4.5

 

$

4.0

 

Adjusted book value of equity

$

22.1

 

$

21.0

 

$

20.7

 

Average adjusted gross debt

 

11.7

 

 

11.1

 

 

11.0

 

Average adjusted invested capital

$

33.9

 

$

32.1

 

$

31.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFTER-TAX RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL

 

16.2%

 

 

14.2%

 

 

12.7%

 

 

(1)Adjusted average invested capital represents the sum of the average book value of equity at the end of the last five quarters, adjusted for pension and fuel hedge impacts within other comprehensive income. Average adjusted net debt is calculated using amounts as of the end of the last five quarters.

OTHER MATTERS80DELTA AIR LINES, INC.


APPENDIX A

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN

(as amended and restated)

Delta Air Lines, Inc. established, effective as of April 30, 2007, the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan, which is hereby amended, restated and renamed, the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Performance Compensation Plan, effective as of June 10, 2016, subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders.

Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to enhance the incentive of those employees, members of the Board and other individuals who are expected to contribute significantly to the success of the Company and its Affiliates in achieving the Company’s short-term and long-term objectives and, in general, to further the best interests of the Company and its shareowners.

Section 2.Definitions. As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

(a)Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and includes the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.

(b)Affiliate means any entity that, directly or indirectly, controls or is controlled by or under common control with the Company.

(c)Award means any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Award or Other Stock-Based Award granted under the Plan, which may be denominated or settled in Shares, cash or in such other forms as provided for herein.

(d)Award Agreement means any agreement, contract or other instrument or document evidencing any Award granted under the Plan, which may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by a Participant, as determined by the Committee.

(e)Board means the board of directors of the Company.

(f)Cause unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, means a Participant’s:

(i) continued, substantial failure to perform his duties with the Company or an Affiliate (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Participant which identifies the manner in which the Company or an Affiliate believes that the Participant has not performed his duties;

(ii) misconduct which is economically injurious to the Company or to any Affiliate;

(iii) conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony or any other crime involving moral turpitude, fraud, theft, embezzlement or dishonesty; or

(iv) material violation of any material Company or Affiliate policy or rule regarding conduct, which policy or rule has been communicated in writing to the Participant.

A Participant shall have at least 10 business days to cure, if curable, any of the events (other than clause (iii)) which could lead to his termination for Cause. For any Participant who is an Executive Vice President or more senior executive of the Company, a termination for Cause must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the entire Board.

(g)Change in Control unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, means the occurrence of:

(i) any “person” (as defined in Section 13(d) of the Act) other than the Company, its Affiliates or an employee benefit plan or trust maintained by the Company or its Affiliates, becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 35% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding Voting Stock (excluding any “person” who becomes such a beneficial owner in connection with a transaction described in clause (A) of paragraph (iii) below), unless such person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 35% of the combined voting power of the Company’s Voting Stock then outstanding solely as a result of an acquisition of Company Voting Stock by the Company which, by reducing the Company Voting Stock outstanding, increases the proportionate Company Voting Stock beneficially owned by such person to more than 35% of the combined voting power of the Company’s Voting Stock then outstanding; provided, that if a person shall become the beneficial owner of more than 35% of the combined voting power of the Company’s Voting Stock then outstanding by reason of such Voting Stock acquisition by the Company and shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional Company Voting Stock which causes the proportionate voting power of such Company Voting Stock beneficially owned by such person to increase to more than 35% of the combined voting power of such Voting Stock then outstanding, such person shall, upon becoming the beneficial owner of such additional Company Voting Stock, be deemed to have become the beneficial owner of more than 35% of the combined voting power of the Company’s Voting Stock then outstanding other than solely as a result of such Voting Stock acquisition by the Company;

(ii) at any time during a period of 12 consecutive months individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (and any new member of the Board, whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s shareowners was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the members of the Board then still in office who either were members of the Board at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was so approved), cease for any reason to constitute a majority of members then constituting the Board; or

(iii) the consummation of (A) a reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company with any other corporation, other than a reorganization, merger or consolidation which results in the Company’s Voting Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or being converted into Voting Stock of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) more than 65% of the voting power of the Voting Stock or the total fair market value of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (B) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of assets of the Company having a total gross fair market value equal to more than 40% of the total gross Fair Market Value of all assets of the Company immediately prior to such transaction or transactions other than any such sale to an Affiliate.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall a Change in Control be deemed to have occurred with respect to a Participant if the Participant is part of a “group,” within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Act, which consummates the Change in Control transaction. In addition, for purposes of the definition of Change in Control, a person engaged in business as an underwriter of securities shall not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of, or to beneficially own, any securities acquired through such person’s participation in good faith in a firm commitment underwriting until the expiration of 40 days after the date of such acquisition.

(h)Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and includes the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.

(i)Committee means the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee as may be designated by the Board. If the Board does not designate the Committee, references herein to the “Committee” shall refer to the Board.

(j)Company means Delta Air Lines, Inc. or any successor thereto.

(k)Covered Employee means an individual who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(3) of the Code or any successor provision thereto.

(l)Disability” means long-term or permanent disability as determined under the disability plan of the Company or Affiliate applicable to the Participant.

(m)Fair Market Value means with respect to Shares, the closing price of a Share on the date in question (or, if there is no reported sale on such date, on the last preceding date on which any reported sale occurred) on the principal stock exchange on which the Shares trade or are quoted, or if Shares are not so listed or quoted, fair market value as determined by the Committee, and with respect to any property other than Shares, the fair market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Committee.

(n)Good Reason, unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, means either:

(i) Except as provided in clause (ii) below in connection with a Change in Control, any of the following which occur without a Participant’s express written consent:

(A)in the case of a Participant who is an Executive Vice President or more senior executive of the Company, a material diminution of such Participant’s authorities, duties or responsibilities, other than an insubstantial and inadvertent act that is promptly remedied by the Company after written notice by such Participant to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company;

(B)the Participant’s office is relocated by more than 50 miles;

(C)a material reduction of Participant’s base salary or target annual bonus opportunities, in either case other than pursuant to a uniform percentage salary or target annual bonus reduction for similarly-situated Participants; or

(D)a material breach by the Company or an Affiliate of any binding obligation to the Participant relating to a material term of the Participant’s employment, including, but not limited to, indemnification or the terms of an Award hereunder, or any failure of a successor to the Company to assume and agree to perform such obligation;or

(ii) any of the following which occur without a Participant’s express written consent during the two-year period following a Change in Control:

(A)a material diminution of the Participant’s authorities, duties or responsibilities, other than an insubstantial and inadvertent act that is promptly remedied by the Company or an Affiliate after written notice by such Participant to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company;

(B)the Participant’s office is relocated by more than 50 miles;

(C)a material reduction of Participant’s base salary or target annual bonus opportunities, in either case other than pursuant to a uniform percentage salary or target annual bonus reduction for similarly-situated Participants; or

(D)a material breach by the Company or an Affiliate of any binding obligation to the Participant relating to a material term of the Participant’s employment, including, but not limited to, indemnification or the terms of an Award hereunder, or any failure of a successor to the Company to assume and agree to perform such obligation.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) as to any Participant, an event described in Section 2(n)(i) or (ii) above shall constitute Good Reason only if such Participant gives the Company written notice of intent to resign and the reasons therefore within 90 days of the occurrence of such event, unless the Committee agrees otherwise and (2) no event described in Section 2(n)(i) or (ii) above that is curable shall constitute Good Reason if such event is cured by the Company or an Affiliate within 30 days of the Participant’s notice, given in accordance with clause (1) above.

(o)Incentive Stock Option means an Option representing the right to purchase Shares from the Company, granted under and in accordance with the terms of Section 6, that (i) meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto and (ii) is designated by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option.

(p)Non-Qualified Stock Option means an Option representing the right to purchase Shares from the Company, granted under and in accordance with the terms of Section 6, that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

(q)Option means an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

(r)Other Stock-Based Award means an Award granted pursuant to Section 10.

(s)Participant means the recipient of an Award granted under the Plan.

(t)Performance Award means an Award granted pursuant to Section 9.

(u)Performance Period means the period (not less than one year) established by the Committee at the time any Performance Award is granted or at any time thereafter during which any performance goals specified by the Committee with respect to such Award are measured.

(v)Plan means the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Performance Compensation Plan, as the same may be amended or restated from time to time, including any appendices hereto.

(w)Qualified Performance-Based Compensation means qualified performance-based compensation as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.162-27(e) or any successor thereto.

(x)Restricted Stock means any Share granted under Section 8.

(y)RSU” or “Restricted Stock Unit means a contractual right granted under Section 8 that is denominated in Shares. Each Unit shall represent a right to receive the value of one Share (or a percentage of such value) upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement. Awards of Restricted Stock Units may include, without limitation, the right to receive dividend equivalents.

(z)Retirement means a Termination of Employment (other than for Cause or death) (i) on or after a Participant’s 52nd birthdayprovided that such Participant has completed at least 10 years of service since his or her most recent hire date with the Company or an Affiliate or (ii) on or after the date that a Participant has completed at least 25 years of service regardless of the Participant’s ageprovided that such Participant has completed at least 10 years of consecutive service since his or her most recent hire date with the Company or an Affiliate.

(aa)SAR” or “Stock Appreciation Right means any right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 7 to receive, upon exercise by the Participant, the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of exercise over (ii) the grant price of the right as specified by the Committee in its discretion, which, except in the case of Substitute Awards or in connection with an adjustment provided in Section 5(d), shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of grant of the right.

(bb)Shares means shares of the common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share.

(cc)Substitute Awards means awards granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or an Affiliate or with which the Company or an Affiliate combines.

(dd)Termination of Employment means, in the case of a Participant who is an employee of the Company or any of its Affiliates, cessation of the employment relationship such that the Participant is no longer an employee of the Company or an Affiliate, or, in the case of a Participant who is an independent contractor, the date the performance of services for the Company or an Affiliate has ended;provided,however, that in the case of an employee, the transfer of employment from the Company to an Affiliate, from an Affiliate to the Company, from one Affiliate to another Affiliate or, unless the Committee determines otherwise, the cessation of employee status but the continuation of the performance of services for the Company or an Affiliate as an independent contractor shall not be deemed a Termination of Employment and, in the case of an independent contractor, performance of services as an employee shall not be deemed a termination of service that would constitute a Termination of Employment; andprovided,further, that a Termination of Employment will be deemed to occur for a Participant employed by an Affiliate when an Affiliate ceases to be an Affiliate unless such Participant’s employment continues with the Company or another Affiliate.

(ee)Vesting Period means with respect to an Award the period designated by the terms of the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement as the period over which services generally must be performed by the Participant receiving such Award in order for such Award to be 100% vested and nonforfeitable.

(ff)Voting Stock means securities entitled to vote generally in the election of members of the board of directors.

Section 3.Eligibility.

(a)Scope. Any employee, member of the Board, consultant or other advisor of, or any other individual who provides services to, the Company or any Affiliate or any other entity in which the Company has a significant equity interest, shall be eligible to be selected to receive an Award under the Plan.

(b)Substitute Awards. Holders of options and other types of awards granted by a company acquired by the Company or an Affiliate or with which the Company or an Affiliate combines are eligible for grant of Substitute Awards hereunder.

Section 4. Administration.

(a)The Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall be appointed by the Board. The Board may designate one or more directors as alternate members of the Committee who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of the Committee. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may delegate its authority to exercise all duties and responsibilities under the Plan, including those listed in Section 4(b) below, to any individual, group of individuals or committee except that any such delegation shall not be applicable to any Award for a person then covered by Section 16 of the Act. The Committee may issue rules and regulations for administration of the Plan. The Committee shall meet at such times and places as it may determine.

(b)Power and Authority. Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law, the Committee (or its delegate) shall have sole and absolute authority and discretion to: (i) designate Participants; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards (including Substitute Awards) to be granted to each Participant under the Plan; (iii) determine the number of Shares to be covered by (or with respect to which payments, rights, or other matters are to be calculated in connection with) Awards; (iv) determine the terms and conditions of any Award; (v) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or exercised in cash,

Shares, other securities, or other Awards, or canceled, forfeited or suspended, and the method or methods by which Awards may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited or suspended; (vi) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award under the Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or of the Committee; (vii) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement relating to, or Award made under, the Plan; (viii) establish, amend, suspend or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; and (ix) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.

(c)All Decisions Binding. All decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon all parties, including the Company, the shareowners and the Participants unless a court of competent jurisdiction determines that such decision was arbitrary and capricious.

(d)The Board.Notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan to the contrary, the Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, grant Awards or administer the Plan. In any such case, the Board shall have all of the authority and responsibility granted to the Committee under the Plan and all references to the Committee shall be deemed references to the Board.

Section 5.Shares Available for Awards and Award Limitations.

(a)Shares Available and Certain Limitations. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5(d), effective June 10, 2016, the maximum number of Shares available for distribution under the Plan will not exceed the aggregate of:

(i) 6,650,000 Shares;

(ii) the number of Shares previously authorized for Awards under the Plan but not reserved for outstanding Awards as of the date the Plan as amended and restated is approved by the Company’s shareholders; and

(iii) any Shares corresponding to Awards under the Plan that are forfeited after the date the amended and restated Plan is approved by the Company’s shareholders.

Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5(d) and the limitations included in Section 12:

(A) Except as provided in Section 5(a)(ii) with respect to non-employee members of the Board, no Participant may receive under the Plan in any calendar year (1) Options and SARs that relate to more than 2,000,000 Shares; (2) Restricted Stock and RSUs that relate to more than 1,000,000 Shares; or (3) Performance Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards that relate to more than 1,500,000 Shares; and the maximum amount that may be paid in a calendar year in respect of an annual Award denominated in cash or value other than Shares with respect to any Participant shall be $10,000,000, and the maximum amount of a long-term incentive Award denominated in cash shall be $10,000,000 multiplied by the number of years included in any applicable Performance Period(s) relating to such Awards; and

(B) The maximum grant date Fair Market Value of any Awards that may be granted to a Participant who is a non-employee member of the Board in any calendar year shall be $1,000,000.

(b)Share Counting. Any Shares subject to an Award (but not including any Substitute Award), that expires, is cancelled, forfeited, or otherwise terminates without the delivery of Shares shall again be, or shall become, available for distribution under the Plan;provided,however, that (i) any Shares tendered in payment of an Option; (ii) Shares withheld by the Company (or tendered by the Participant) to satisfy any tax withholding

obligation with respect to the exercise of an Option or SAR; or (iii) Shares covered by a stock-settled SAR that were not issued upon the settlement of the Award, shall not again be available for distribution under the Plan.

(c)Type of Shares. Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares or Shares acquired by the Company.

(d)Effect of Certain Changes. In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares or other securities), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Shares or other securities of the Company, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects the Shares such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, then the Committee shall adjust equitably any or all of (i) the number and type of Shares (or other securities) which thereafter may be made the subject of Awards, including the aggregate and individual limits specified in Section 5(a) and Section 12; (ii) the number and type of Shares (or other securities) subject to outstanding Awards; and (iii) the grant, purchase, or exercise price with respect to any Award or, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding Award;provided,however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award denominated in Shares shall always be a whole number.

(e)Effect of Substitute Awards. Shares underlying Substitute Awards shall not reduce the number of Shares remaining available for distribution under the Plan.

Section 6.Options.

(a)Options Generally. The Committee is authorized to grant Options to Participants with the following terms and conditions and with such additional terms and conditions, in either case not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine.

(b)Exercise Price. The exercise price per Share under an Option shall be determined by the Committee;provided,however, that, except in the case of Substitute Awards, such exercise price shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of such Option.

(c)Term. The term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee but shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant thereof.

(d)Vesting and Exercisability. The Committee shall determine the time or times at which an Option may be exercised in whole or in part with such time or times to be specified in the Award Agreement for the Option.

(e)Payment of Exercise Price. The Committee shall determine the method or methods, including broker-assisted cashless exercise, by which, and the form or forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other Awards, or any combination thereof, having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the relevant exercise price, in which, payment of the exercise price with respect thereto may be made or deemed to have been made.

(f)Incentive Stock Options. The terms of any Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and any regulations promulgated thereunder.

Section 7.Stock Appreciation Rights.

(a)SARs Generally. The Committee is authorized to grant SARs to Participants with such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

(b)Grants. SARs may be granted to Participants either alone (“freestanding”) or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan (“tandem”) and may, but need not, relate to a specific Option granted under Section 6.

(c)Tandem SARs. Any tandem SAR related to an Option may be granted at the same time such Option is granted or at any time thereafter before exercise or expiration of such Option. In the case of any tandem SAR related to any Option, the SAR or applicable portion thereof shall not be exercisable until the related Option or applicable portion thereof is exercisable and shall terminate and no longer be exercisable upon the termination or exercise of the related Option, except that a SAR granted with respect to less than the full number of Shares covered by a related Option shall not be reduced until the exercise or termination of the related Option exceeds the number of Shares not covered by the SAR. Any Option related to any tandem SAR shall no longer be exercisable to the extent the related SAR has been exercised.

(d)Term. A freestanding SAR shall not have a term of greater than 10 years from the date of grant thereof, or, unless it is a Substitute Award, an exercise price less than 100% of Fair Market Value of the Share on the date of grant.

Section 8.Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.

(a)Restricted Stock and RSUs Generally. The Committee is authorized to grant Awards of Restricted Stock and RSUs to Participants with such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

(b)Restrictions. Shares of Restricted Stock and RSUs shall be subject to such restrictions as the Committee may impose (including, without limitation, any limitation on the right to vote a Share of Restricted Stock or the right to receive any dividend or other right), which restrictions may lapse or be waived by the Committee separately or in combination at such time or times, in such installments or otherwise, as the Committee may deem appropriate.

(c)Evidence of Award. Any share of Restricted Stock may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee may deem appropriate including, without limitation, book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates. In the event any stock certificate is issued in respect of shares of Restricted Stock, such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Participant and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.

(d)Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. An Award under this Section 8 shall, if the Committee intends that such Award should constitute Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, comply with Section 12.

Section 9.Performance Awards.

(a)Performance Awards Generally. The Committee is authorized to grant Performance Awards to Participants with such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

(b)Denomination; Performance Goals. Performance Awards may be denominated as a cash amount, number of Shares, or a combination thereof and are Awards which may be earned upon achievement or satisfaction of performance conditions specified by the Committee. The Committee may use such business criteria and other measures of performance as it may deem appropriate in establishing any performance conditions. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the performance goals to be achieved during any Performance Period, the length of any Performance Period, the amount of any Performance Award granted and the amount of any payment or transfer to be made pursuant to any Performance Award shall be determined by the Committee.

(c)Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. Every Performance Award shall, if the Committee intends that such Award should constitute Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, comply with Section 12. Except in the case of an Award intended to qualify as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, if the Committee determines, in its discretion, that external changes or other unanticipated business conditions have materially affected the fairness of the performance goals, then the Committee may approve appropriate adjustments to the performance goals (either up or down) in whole or in part. Performance measures may vary from Performance Award to Performance Award, respectively, and from Participant to Participant, and may be established on a stand-alone basis, in tandem or in the alternative.

(d)Settlement of Performance Awards; Other Terms. Settlement of Performance Awards shall be in cash, Shares, other Awards or other property, or a combination thereof, in the discretion of the Committee, as may be specified in the applicable Award Agreement or as otherwise may be determined by the Committee. Performance Awards will be distributed only after the end of the relevant Performance Period. The Committee may, in its discretion, increase or reduce the amount of a settlement otherwise to be made in connection with such Performance Awards.

Section 10.Other Stock-Based Awards.

(a)Other Stock-Based Awards Generally. The Committee is authorized to grant Other Stock-Based Awards to Participants with terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan. Every Other Stock-Based Award shall, if the Committee intends that such Award should constitute Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, comply with Section 12.

(b)Denomination; Purchase Rights. The Committee is authorized, subject to limitations under applicable law, to grant to Participants such other Awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Shares or factors that may influence the value of Shares, including, without limitation, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into Shares, purchase rights for Shares, Awards with value and payment contingent upon performance of the Company or business units thereof or any other factors designated by the Committee. Shares delivered pursuant to an Award in the nature of a purchase right granted under this Section 10 shall be purchased for such consideration, paid for at such times, by such methods, and in such forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other Awards, notes, or other property, as the Committee shall determine. Cash Awards, as stand-alone Awards or as an element of or supplement to any other Award under the Plan, may also be granted pursuant to this Section 10.

Section 11. Effect of Termination of Employment and a Change in Control on Awards.At the time of grant of an Award the Committee shall provide, by rule or regulation or in any Award Agreement, or may determine at any time in any individual case, the circumstances in which Awards shall be exercised, vested, paid or forfeited in the event a Participant ceases to provide service to the Company or any Affiliate or in the event of a Change in Control prior to the end of a Performance Period or exercise or settlement of such Award.

Section 12.Qualified Performance-Based Compensation.

(a)Pre-Established Formula Required. Every Award that is intended to constitute Qualified Performance-Based Compensation shall include a pre-established formula, such that exercise, payment, retention or vesting of the Award is subject to the achievement during a Performance Period or Performance Periods, as determined by the Committee, of a level or levels of, or improvements in, in each case as determined by the Committee, one or more performance measures with respect to the Company, any Affiliate and/or any business unit of the Company or any Affiliate, based on the following:

(i) any of the following financial measures: revenue per available seat mile; cost per available seat mile; total shareowner return; return on equity, assets, capital or investment; operating, pre-tax or net income levels expressed in either absolute dollars, earnings per share, or changes of the same; the market

price of Shares; economic or cash value added; capitalization; net or operating profit margin; revenues or revenue growth; expenses; cash flow; operating cash flow or liquidity; or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and aircraft rent;

(ii) the results of employee satisfaction surveys;

(iii) the results of customer satisfaction surveys; and

(iv) other measures of operational performance (including, without limitation, U.S. Department of Transportation performance rankings in operational areas), quality, safety, productivity or process improvement.

Performance criteria may be measured on an absolute (e.g., plan or budget) or relative basis. Relative performance may be measured against a group of peer companies, a financial market index, or other acceptable objective and quantifiable indices.

The Committee may provide in any Award that is intended to constitute Qualified Performance-Based Compensation that any performance criteria may include or exclude the impact, if any, on reported financial results of any of the following events that occurs during a Performance Period: (A) asset write-downs; (B) litigation or claim judgments or settlements; (C) changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or regulations; (D) reorganization or restructuring programs; (E) acquisitions or divestitures; (F) foreign exchange gains and losses; or (G) gains and losses that are treated as unusual or nonrecurring items under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 225. Such inclusions or exclusions shall be prescribed in a form and at a time that meets the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code for qualification of the Award as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation.

(b)Other Restrictions. In addition to the Award limitations set forth in Section 5(a), the Committee shall have the power to impose such other restrictions on Awards subject to this Section 12 as it may deem necessary or appropriate to ensure that such Awards satisfy all requirements for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Committee shall not be authorized to increase the amount payable to a Covered Employee under any Award to which this Section 12 applies upon attainment of suchpre-established formula.

(c)Certain Changes Prohibited. Any settlement which changes the form of payment from that originally specified for an Award intended to constitute a Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be implemented in a manner such that the Award does not, solely for that reason, fail to qualify as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation.

Section 13.General Provisions Applicable to Awards.

(a)Restrictive Covenants. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Award with respect to non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and other conduct as it deems necessary or appropriate in its discretion.

(b)Configuration of Awards. Awards may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone or in addition to or in tandem with any other Award or any award granted under any other plan of the Company. Awards granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards, or in addition to or in tandem with awards granted under any other plan of the Company, may be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other Awards or awards. Awards may be granted for no cash consideration or for such minimal cash consideration as may be required by applicable law.

(c)Form of Payment. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, payments or transfers to be made by the Company upon the grant, exercise or payment of an Award may be made in the form

of cash, Shares, other securities or other Awards, or any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee in its discretion at the time of grant or as of the time of such exercise or payment, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or on a deferred basis, in each case in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Committee. Such rules and procedures may include, without limitation, provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable interest on installment or deferred payments or the grant or crediting of dividend equivalents in respect of installment or deferred payments.

(d)Nontransferability. Except as may be permitted by the Committee or as specifically provided in an Award Agreement, (i) no Award and no right under any Award shall be assignable, alienable, pledgeable, saleable or transferable by a Participant otherwise than by will or pursuant to Section 13(e) and (ii) each Award, and each right under any Award, shall be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. The provisions of this Section 13(d) shall not apply to any Award which has been fully exercised or paid, as the case may be, and shall not preclude forfeiture of an Award in accordance with the terms thereof.

(e)Participant’s Death. Upon the death of a Participant, the beneficiary eligible to receive payments or other benefits or exercise rights that are available under the Plan at the Participant’s death shall be the Participant’s estate.

(f)Legended Certificates. All certificates for Shares and/or Shares or other securities delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award or the exercise thereof shall be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan or the rules, regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which such Shares or other securities are then listed, and any applicable Federal or state securities laws, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

Section 14.Amendments and Termination.

(a)The Plan. Except to the extent prohibited by applicable law and unless otherwise expressly provided in an Award Agreement or in the Plan, the Board or the Committee may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time;provided,however, that no such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made without (i) shareowner approval if such approval is required by the listed company rules of the stock exchange, if any, on which the Shares are principally traded or quoted or (ii) with respect to any affected Participant, the consent of such Participant if such action would adversely affect the rights of such Participant under any outstanding Award, except to the extent any such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance or termination is made to cause the Plan to comply with applicable law, stock exchange rules and regulations or accounting or tax rules and regulations. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Committee may amend the Plan in such manner as may be necessary to enable the Plan to achieve its stated purposes in any jurisdiction in atax-efficient manner and in compliance with local rules and regulations.

(b)Awards. The Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend any terms of, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate, any Award theretofore granted, prospectively or retroactively, without the consent of any relevant Participant or holder or beneficiary of an Award;provided,however, that no such action shall adversely affect the rights of any affected Participant or holder or beneficiary (without such person’s consent) under any Award theretofore granted under the Plan, except to the extent any such action is made to cause the Plan to comply with applicable law, stock exchange rules and regulations or accounting or tax rules and regulations; andprovided further, that the Committee’s authority under this Section 14(b) is limited in the case of Awards subject to Section 12, as set forth in Section 12.

(c)Certain Equitable Adjustments. Except as noted in Section 12, the Committee shall be authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 5(d)) affecting the Company, or the financial

statements of the Company, or of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan.

(d)Cancellation of Awards. Any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the Committee may cause any Award granted hereunder to be canceled in consideration of a cash payment or alternative Award made to the holder of such canceled Award equal in value to the Fair Market Value of such canceled Award as of the date of cancellation, except that this Section 14(d) shall not be interpreted to permit any transaction that is prohibited by Section 14(f) relating to the repricing of certain Awards.

(e)Corrections and Clarifications. The Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award in the manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry the Plan into effect.

(f)No Repricing without Shareholder Approval.Except as provided under Section 5(d), unless approved by shareholders of the Company, no Option or SAR may (i) be amended to decrease the exercise price thereof; (ii) be canceled in exchange for the grant of any new Option or SAR with a lower exercise price or any other Award; (iii) be repurchased by the Company or its Affiliates; or (iv) otherwise be subject to any action that would be treated under accounting rules, stock exchange rules or otherwise as a repricing of such Option or SAR (including a cash buyout or voluntary surrender/subsequent regrant of an underwater Option or SAR).

Section 15.Miscellaneous.

(a)No Uniformity Required; No Promise of Future Grants. No employee, Participant or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of employees, Participants, or holders or beneficiaries of Awards under the Plan. The terms and conditions of Awards need not be the same with respect to each recipient. Any Award granted under the Plan shall be a one-time Award which does not constitute a promise of future grants. The Committee, in its discretion, maintains the sole right to make grants hereunder.

(b)No Rights as Shareowner. A Participant granted an Award shall have no rights as a shareowner of the Company with respect to such Award unless and until such time as certificates or book-entry shares for the Shares underlying the Award are registered in such Participant’s name in the Company’s stock records.

(c)Withholdings. The Company shall be authorized to withhold from any Award granted or any payment due or transfer made under any Award or under the Plan or from any compensation or other amount owing to a Participant the amount (in cash, Shares, other securities or other Awards) of withholding taxes due in respect of an Award, its exercise, or any payment or transfer under such Award or under the Plan and to take such other action (including, without limitation, providing for elective payment of such amounts in cash or Shares by the Participant) as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for the payment of such taxes. If Shares are withheld by the Company or tendered by the Participant to satisfy the Company’s withholding obligations, then the Fair Market Value of such Shares on the date the withholding is to be determined shall not exceed the minimum statutory withholding requirement (or, in the discretion of the Committee, the Fair Market Value of such Shares may exceed the minimum statutory withholding requirement but may not be greater than the maximum tax withholding requirement; provided that the exercise of such discretion by the Committee would not result in an Award otherwise classified as an equity award under ASC Topic 718 to be classified as a liability award under ASC Topic 718).

(d)Other Compensation Arrangements. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company from adopting or continuing in effect other or additional compensation arrangements, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

(e)No Right to Continued Employment. The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be retained in the employ of, or to continue to provide services to, the Company or any Affiliate. Further, the Company or the applicable Affiliate may at any time dismiss a Participant, free from any liability, or any claim under the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in any Award Agreement or in any other agreement binding the parties. The receipt of any Award under the Plan is not intended to confer any rights on the receiving Participant except as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.

(f)Governing Law; Construction of Plan. The Plan and all determinations made and actions taken thereunder shall be governed by the internal substantive laws of the State of Georgia and construed accordingly, to the extent not superseded by applicable federal law. If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or as to any person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or Award, and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.

(g)Unfunded and Unsecured Arrangement. Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and a Participant or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.

(h) No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award, and the Committee shall determine whether cash or other securities shall be paid or transferred in lieu of any fractional Shares, or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated.

Section 16.Effective Date of the Plan. The Plan shall be effective as of June 10, 2016, subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders.

Section 17.Term of the Plan. No Award shall be granted under the Plan on or after the ten year anniversary of the date the Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award, or to waive any conditions or rights under any such Award, and the authority of the Board or the Committee to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond such date.

Section 18.Section 409A of the Code. With respect to Awards subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A, and the provisions hereof shall be interpreted in a manner that satisfies the requirements of Section 409A and the related regulations, and the Plan shall be operated accordingly. If any provision of the Plan or any term or condition of any Award would otherwise frustrate or conflict with this intent, the provision, term or condition will be interpreted and deemed amended by the Committee so as to avoid this conflict.To the extent any payment or Award provided to a Participant under the Plan constitutes “deferred compensation” under Section 409A and the Participant at the time of his Termination of Employment is considered to be a “specified employee” pursuant to the Company’s policy for determining such employees, the distribution or payment of any such amount will be delayed for six months following the Participant’s separation from service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor the Committee shall have any liability to any Participant or any other person if an Award is determined to constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the terms of such Award do not satisfy the additional conditions applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code.

APPENDIX B

Delta Air Lines

Comparative Analysis of Options & Full Share Utilization/Overhang

Burn Rate calculated using “Modified ISS” conversion ratio; Overhang calculated using a 1:1 conversion ratio

Company  

ISS

Conversion

Factor1

  

Current

Options/

Full Shares

Granted

   

Current

Run2

Rate

  

Options &

Full Shares

Issued &

Unexercised

   

Existing

Overhang3

  

Remaining/

Additional Shares

Authorized

   

Total

Overhang4

  

Common

Shares

Outstanding

 

American Airlines Group Inc

  2   4,426,000     0.7  9,620,000     1.4  26,341,405     5.1  668,393,005  

Best Buy Co Inc

  2   8,149,000     2.4  20,807,000     5.7  19,590,014     10.4  346,500,000  

Boeing Co

  3   4,243,335     0.6  17,516,620     2.5  16,894,098     4.8  686,900,000  

Carnival

  3   3,759,150     0.5  3,644,395     0.5  18,254,879     2.7  777,000,000  

Coca-Cola Co

  3.5   19,499,500     0.4  279,137,205     6.0  474,604,234     14.8  4,352,000,000  

FedEx Corp

  3   2,907,491     1.0  14,660,866     4.9  13,157,142     8.9  283,000,000  

Home Depot Inc

  3   10,801,000     0.8  19,541,000     1.4  142,864,824     10.8  1,338,000,000  

Honeywell International Inc

  3   9,538,474     1.2  35,551,026     4.4  47,000,000     9.6  779,799,988  

L-3 Communications

  3   1,722,000     2.1  4,143,000     4.9  11,000,000     15.8  80,699,997  

Lowe’s Companies Inc

  3   6,967,000     0.7  13,427,000     1.3  37,239,338     4.9  988,000,000  

Marriott

  3   4,547,773     1.7  10,761,000     3.9  11,401,691     7.7  267,299,988  

Norfolk Southern

  3   2,370,930     0.8  8,098,511     2.6  12,611,472     6.4  301,899,994  

PepsiCo Inc

  3.5   12,590,500     0.9  41,401,000     2.7  90,801,372     8.3  1,469,000,000  

Southwest

  2.5   1,472,500     0.2  2,307,000     0.3  22,765,741     3.7  661,000,000  

Sysco Corp

  3.5   8,823,744     1.5  28,490,032     4.6  44,914,646     11.0  592,072,021  

Target Corp

  3   11,601,000     1.8  18,749,000     2.9  31,500,000     7.4  627,700,012  

Textron

  2.5   2,260,000     0.8  9,688,000     3.4  17,110,000     8.8  276,682,007  

Union Pacific

  3   3,514,000     0.4  9,726,000     1.1  76,548,520     9.1  866,200,012  

United Continental Holdings

  2   400,000     0.1  800,000     0.2  7,557,234     2.2  376,000,000  

United Parcel Service Inc

  3.5   21,265,000     2.4  15,398,000     1.7  24,456,658     4.2  901,000,000  

United Technologies Corp

  3   9,524,000     1.1  43,627,000     4.8  45,846,000     9.3  872,700,012  
   

25th Percentile

     2,907,491     0.6  9,620,000     1.4  16,894,098     4.9  346,500,000  

50th Percentile

     4,547,773     0.8  14,660,866     2.7  24,456,658     8.3  668,393,005  

75th Percentile

     9,538,474     1.5  20,807,000     4.6  45,846,000     9.6  872,700,012  

Delta Air Lines

  2.5   4,132,688     0.5%   9,082,515     1.2%   33,489,417     5.3%   766,618,452  

1ir.delta.com

Uses ISS guideline to convert full shares to option equivalents based on the company’s volatility.  2020 PROXY STATEMENT     76

2

Current Run Rate = Current options + full value shares granted / common shares outstanding.

3

Existing Overhang = (Options + full value shares issued and unexercised) / (options + full value shares issued and unexercised + common shares outstanding).

4

Total Overhang = (Options + full value shares issued and unexercised + remaining/additional shares authorized) / (options + full value shares issued and unexercised + remaining/additional shares authorized + common shares outstanding).

LOGO

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

1030 DELTA BLVD.

DEPARTMENT 829

ATLANTA, GA 30354-1989

You may submit this proxy or these voting instructions, as applicable, using the Internet, telephone or U.S. mail. Participants in the Delta Pilots Savings Plan and the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan and holders of unvested restricted common stock may submit voting instructions on this proxy card.

To vote online or by telephone have this proxy card in hand and go to www.proxyvote.com or call 1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions.

If you mail this proxy card, mark, sign and date the card and return it in the postage-paid envelope, or send it to: For registered stockholders and holders of unvested restricted common stock - Delta Air Lines, Inc., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. For Delta Pilots Savings Plan participants and Delta Family-Care Savings Plan participants - Fidelity Management Trust Company, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

VOTING DEADLINES

Delta Pilots Savings Plan and Delta Family-Care Savings Plan Participants:

Voting instructions submitted using the Internet or telephone must be submitted before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on Wednesday, June 8, 2016. Voting instructions submitted by mailing this proxy card must be received by the trustee by that time.

Registered Stockholders and Holders of Unvested Restricted Common Stock:

Voting instructions submitted using the Internet or telephone must be submitted before 11:59 p.m. EDT on Thursday, June 9, 2016. Voting instructions submitted by mailing this proxy card must be received by Broadridge by that time.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

Delta encourages stockholders to sign up to receive proxy materials electronically in the future. Using electronic communication significantly reduces our printing and postage costs, and helps protect the environment. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive stockholder communications electronically in the future.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E08746-P77412            KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5.

DELTA’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR

ALL NOMINEES:

1.Election of Nominees for Director:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

1a.    Richard H. Anderson

¨¨¨

1l.      Sergio A.L. Rial

¨¨¨

1b.   Edward H. Bastian

¨¨¨

1m.    Kathy N. Waller

¨¨¨

1c.    Francis S. Blake

¨¨¨

1n.     Kenneth B. Woodrow

¨¨¨

1d.   Daniel A. Carp

¨¨¨DELTA’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4.

1e.    David G. DeWalt

¨¨¨2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Delta’s named executive officers.¨¨¨

1f.    Thomas E. Donilon

¨¨¨3.To approve the amendment and restatement of Delta’s Performance Compensation Plan.¨¨¨

1g.   William H. Easter III

¨¨¨4.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Delta’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2016.¨¨¨

1h.   Mickey P. Foret

¨¨¨DELTA’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST PROPOSAL 5.

1i.    Shirley C. Franklin

¨¨¨5.A stockholder proposal for senior executives to retain significant stock.¨¨¨

1j.    George N. Mattson

¨¨¨

1k.   Douglas R. Ralph

¨¨¨
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.¨
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.¨¨
YesNo

(NOTE:Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. All holders must sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.)

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the

Year Ended December 31, 2015 are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E08747-P77412Back to Contents

 


DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

I hereby appoint Richard H. Anderson, Daniel A. Carp and Kenneth B. Woodrow, and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution, for and in my name,Back to vote all shares of Common Stock of Delta Air Lines, Inc. owned by me which I would be entitledContents


Back to personally vote on all matters which may properly come before the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Delta to be held at the offices of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, 825 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10019 on Friday, June 10, 2016 at 7:30 a.m., local time, or any adjournment of the meeting.Contents

The proxies shall vote subject to the directions indicated on the reverse side of this Proxy Card, and the proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment of the meeting. The proxies will vote as the Board of Directors recommends where a choice is not specified. The proxies cannot vote these shares unless you sign, date and return this Proxy Card or vote by the Internet or telephone.

If I am the holder of unvested restricted common stock granted under Delta’s 2007 Performance Compensation Plan, I hereby instruct the administrator of the 2007 Performance Compensation Plan to vote the shares of unvested restricted common stock granted to me at the annual meeting, as indicated on the reverse side of this card. I understand that the administrator of the 2007 Performance Compensation Plan will not vote the shares of unvested restrictedcommon stock granted to me if I do not submit voting instructions before 11:59 p.m. EDT on Thursday, June 9, 2016.

If I am a participant in the Delta Pilots Savings Plan (Pilot Plan) or the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan (Savings Plan), I hereby instruct Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee, to vote the shares of Delta common stock attributable to the Pilot Plan account or the Savings Plan account, as applicable, at the annual meeting, as indicated on the reverse side of this card. These instructions shall be confidential. I understand that the Trustee will not vote shares attributable to the Pilot Plan account or the Savings Plan account if the Trustee does not receive voting instructions from me before 5:00 p.m. EDT on Wednesday, June 8, 2016.

I acknowledge receipt of Delta’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, dated April 29, 2016, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2015.

Address Changes/Comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side